Problem posting to this group!!

Discussion in 'Computer Information' started by R. Giggs., Oct 27, 2012.

  1. R. Giggs.

    R. Giggs. Guest

    I am having problems posting here, my short tret message got through but
    anything significantly longer is not being sent!!
     
    R. Giggs., Oct 27, 2012
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. R. Giggs.

    R. Giggs. Guest

    "R. Giggs." <> wrote in message
    news:CSWis.59200$4...
    >I am having problems posting here, my short tret message got through but
    > anything significantly longer is not being sent!!
    >



    Trying a bit longer post-


    I do have a .found on that drive but nothing is dated to suggest it was
    recovered recently, but maybe it uses the original dates of the files, but
    the .found
    folder is dated 29/8/12.

    Note there is no .found folder on my current C: drive, it is on the bad
    drive, which
    is on as slave and thus called G: in that position.
     
    R. Giggs., Oct 27, 2012
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. R. Giggs.

    Robert Baer Guest

    R. Giggs. wrote:
    > "R. Giggs."<> wrote in message
    > news:CSWis.59200$4...
    >> I am having problems posting here, my short tret message got through but
    >> anything significantly longer is not being sent!!
    >>

    >
    >
    > Trying a bit longer post-
    >
    >
    > I do have a .found on that drive but nothing is dated to suggest it was
    > recovered recently, but maybe it uses the original dates of the files, but
    > the .found
    > folder is dated 29/8/12.
    >
    > Note there is no .found folder on my current C: drive, it is on the bad
    > drive, which
    > is on as slave and thus called G: in that position.
    >
    >

    Methinks CHKDSK creates things like this from lost clusters and other
    "baddies",so it is no wonder that your bad drive shows "recovered" junk.
    The files are always incomplete and unusable; i have found it is 101%
    safe to delete them and then a "good idea" as Mrtha stewart used to say,
    to do a defrag - - and THEN run Spinrite minimum level 2.
    Copy what you need from that bad drive and trash it yesterday.
     
    Robert Baer, Oct 30, 2012
    #3
  4. R. Giggs.

    R. Giggs. Guest

    "Robert Baer" <> wrote in message
    news:hmFjs.1912$...
    > R. Giggs. wrote:
    >> "R. Giggs."<> wrote in message
    >> news:CSWis.59200$4...
    >>> I am having problems posting here, my short tret message got through but
    >>> anything significantly longer is not being sent!!
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >> Trying a bit longer post-
    >>
    >>
    >> I do have a .found on that drive but nothing is dated to suggest it was
    >> recovered recently, but maybe it uses the original dates of the files,
    >> but
    >> the .found
    >> folder is dated 29/8/12.
    >>
    >> Note there is no .found folder on my current C: drive, it is on the bad
    >> drive, which
    >> is on as slave and thus called G: in that position.
    >>
    >>

    > Methinks CHKDSK creates things like this from lost clusters and other
    > "baddies",so it is no wonder that your bad drive shows "recovered" junk.
    > The files are always incomplete and unusable; i have found it is 101%
    > safe to delete them and then a "good idea" as Mrtha stewart used to say,
    > to do a defrag - - and THEN run Spinrite minimum level 2.
    > Copy what you need from that bad drive and trash it yesterday.
    >
    >


    Thanks, I don't think the lost (and found files are too important) the dates
    on them
    are old. I don't have spinrite and I don't think it is worth me getting it
    as I don't know
    of any valuable files lost.
    It seems all the data is there, I put the drive in a USB caddy and have
    extracted all the data
    off it (I hope!!), I am pretty sure I have all the data I need anyway. THe
    drive onoly had a few
    months worth of data one it really as I cloned the drive from a my previous
    main drive about
    2 months earlier so there was not really much new data on it and as I said I
    have basically
    recovered al the data on it, at least I don't know of anything missing.
    THe only thing I had a problem with were some files with very long file
    names, about
    8-9 folders in depth,w hich I recovered anyway by shortening files names.

    So I stil have the drive, and a back up of the data, I won't trash it yet,
    no point really
    but I won't be using it for anything important. Iwill just keep it to play
    around with.
    Most of the drive seems OK, it's only on the last 10% of scan that errors
    crop up.
    I am currenly running another scan but they take a very long time with it
    being external on a slow
    USB 2.0 connection.

    I'd like to investigate the problem with it in that if it is in the machine
    it seems to prevent it
    booting even when itis not the boot drive.
    So things I might try are , conencting it as a SATA drive (I have an IDE -
    SATA conversion kit).
    defragging it, and reformating it and seeingif any of those help at all.
     
    R. Giggs., Nov 2, 2012
    #4
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. The Bloke down the Road ...

    Advice on new's Group posting's

    The Bloke down the Road ..., Nov 17, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    429
    ┬░Mike┬░
    Nov 17, 2003
  2. scaredkitty

    Top Posting vs. Bottom Posting

    scaredkitty, Apr 5, 2005, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    37
    Views:
    1,415
  3. Colin D

    CROSS-POSTING, OR MULTI-POSTING, OR NEITHER?

    Colin D, Feb 28, 2006, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    56
    Views:
    1,714
    rcyoung
    Mar 8, 2006
  4. Wayne Wastier

    [OT] : Top Posting vs Bottom Posting

    Wayne Wastier, Jul 17, 2005, in forum: Windows 64bit
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    779
    Al Swearengen
    Jul 17, 2005
  5. T.N.O.
    Replies:
    21
    Views:
    812
    Hypnos
    Sep 15, 2003
Loading...

Share This Page