pretty pictures

Discussion in 'NZ Computing' started by Shane, Apr 21, 2006.

  1. Shane

    Shane Guest

    Shane, Apr 21, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Shane wrote:
    > Hey its friday.. its either these or beer!
    > http://www.caida.org/analysis/topology/as_core_network/pics/ascoreApr2005.png
    >
    > http://www.internettrafficreport.com/main.htm
    >
    > http://www.internettrafficreport.com/details.htm
    > (this last one shows 9 routers(?) with heavy to 100% packet loss or *bad*
    > response times)

    The data from Internet Traffic report is only as reliable as the people who
    provide it, those you see with 0 figures have probably decided to stop
    providing data or the routers have been removed or reassigned.

    --
    >>Follow ups may be set to a single group when appropriate!

    ======================================================================
    | Local 38.2330S, 175.8670E |
    ======================================================================
     
    Collector»NZ, Apr 21, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Shane

    Shane Guest

    Collector»NZ wrote:

    > Shane wrote:
    >> Hey its friday.. its either these or beer!
    >>

    http://www.caida.org/analysis/topology/as_core_network/pics/ascoreApr2005.png
    >>
    >> http://www.internettrafficreport.com/main.htm
    >>
    >> http://www.internettrafficreport.com/details.htm
    >> (this last one shows 9 routers(?) with heavy to 100% packet loss or *bad*
    >> response times)

    > The data from Internet Traffic report is only as reliable as the people
    > who provide it, those you see with 0 figures have probably decided to stop
    > providing data or the routers have been removed or reassigned.
    >



    ahh that clears something up ( 7 of 9 had null figures for the last
    recording period)
    Begs the question, why are they still included in the map
    Thanks though

    --
    Rule 6: There is no rule 6
     
    Shane, Apr 21, 2006
    #3
  4. Shane wrote:
    > Collector»NZ wrote:
    >
    >> Shane wrote:
    >>> Hey its friday.. its either these or beer!
    >>>

    > http://www.caida.org/analysis/topology/as_core_network/pics/ascoreApr2005.png
    >>> http://www.internettrafficreport.com/main.htm
    >>>
    >>> http://www.internettrafficreport.com/details.htm
    >>> (this last one shows 9 routers(?) with heavy to 100% packet loss or *bad*
    >>> response times)

    >> The data from Internet Traffic report is only as reliable as the people
    >> who provide it, those you see with 0 figures have probably decided to stop
    >> providing data or the routers have been removed or reassigned.
    >>

    >
    >
    > ahh that clears something up ( 7 of 9 had null figures for the last
    > recording period)
    > Begs the question, why are they still included in the map
    > Thanks though
    >

    They are included because you gets what you pay for and no payment means no
    care of duty to keep the info current or correct

    --
    >>Follow ups may be set to a single group when appropriate!

    ======================================================================
    | Local 38.2330S, 175.8670E |
    ======================================================================
     
    Collector»NZ, Apr 21, 2006
    #4
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Ralph Wade Phillips

    Re: Pretty Please Peer2Peer need help Pretty Please

    Ralph Wade Phillips, Jul 6, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    555
    Ralph Wade Phillips
    Jul 6, 2003
  2. John Haithwaite @ Blue Case Solutions

    Re: Pretty Please Peer2Peer need help Pretty Please

    John Haithwaite @ Blue Case Solutions, Jul 6, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    605
    John Haithwaite @ Blue Case Solutions
    Jul 6, 2003
  3. Harvey

    Re: One more Pretty Face - Pretty face9.jpg [1/1]

    Harvey, Nov 3, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    458
    Pepys
    Nov 4, 2004
  4. Crownfield

    7 steps to pretty pictures. :)

    Crownfield, Jan 21, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    12
    Views:
    464
    Christopher Pollard
    Jan 23, 2005
  5. Focus

    Pretty and funny pictures

    Focus, Mar 5, 2008, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    326
    Doug Jewell
    Mar 5, 2008
Loading...

Share This Page