pots-to-pots call transfer without tromboning using Cisco 2600

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Per, Jul 21, 2003.

  1. Per

    Per Guest

    Greetings all,

    1. Is it possible to transfer a selected incoming POTS call to another
    POTS destination and avoid Tromboning, i.e. not allocate two call
    ports after the transfer is completed?

    2. What is the ISDN signalling specification for this?

    We use a standard european ISDN PRA connected to a Cisco 2600 series
    router/gateway.

    Any clues pointers or information on any of the two questions would be
    greatly appreciated.

    Kind regards,
    Per
     
    Per, Jul 21, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Per

    Jeff Specoli Guest

    I think you can do something like what you are looking for. Just make
    one pots peer incoming called-number <number> and another pots peer
    destination-pattern <number>. It's called hairpinning.



    (Per) wrote in message news:<>...
    > Greetings all,
    >
    > 1. Is it possible to transfer a selected incoming POTS call to another
    > POTS destination and avoid Tromboning, i.e. not allocate two call
    > ports after the transfer is completed?
    >
    > 2. What is the ISDN signalling specification for this?
    >
    > We use a standard european ISDN PRA connected to a Cisco 2600 series
    > router/gateway.
    >
    > Any clues pointers or information on any of the two questions would be
    > greatly appreciated.
    >
    > Kind regards,
    > Per
     
    Jeff Specoli, Jul 21, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. cyrus
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    946
    cyrus
    Nov 24, 2003
  2. Wim
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    737
    Andrew Gabriel
    Dec 17, 2005
  3. FreedomFireCom
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,175
    FreedomFireCom
    Oct 3, 2007
  4. Replies:
    2
    Views:
    847
  5. alexsaiz82
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,661
    alexsaiz82
    Oct 9, 2008
Loading...

Share This Page