Outlook Express Problem (XP SP2)

Discussion in 'Computer Support' started by Bay0Wulf, Sep 19, 2004.

  1. Bay0Wulf

    Bay0Wulf Guest

    OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the way my
    OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders and a
    small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help prevent
    the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download pictures."
    If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!

    How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?

    Please advise.

    As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"

    - Bay0Wulf
    Bay0Wulf, Sep 19, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    news:GVj3d.395897$...
    > OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the way
    > my OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders
    > and a small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    > prevent the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    > pictures." If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    >
    > How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    >
    > Please advise.
    >
    > As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    >
    > - Bay0Wulf
    >


    In OE, go to "tools", "security" and uncheck the box "block images and other
    external content in html e-mail".
    mentalguy2004, Sep 19, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Bay0Wulf

    Hackworth Guest

    "mentalguy2004" <> wrote in message
    news:eek:%j3d.599$...
    >
    > "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    > news:GVj3d.395897$...
    >> OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the way
    >> my OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders
    >> and a small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    >> prevent the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    >> pictures." If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    >>
    >> How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    >>
    >> Please advise.
    >>
    >> As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    >>
    >> - Bay0Wulf
    >>

    >
    > In OE, go to "tools", "security" and uncheck the box "block images and
    > other external content in html e-mail".


    I was going to post the very same question myself today! Many thanks for the
    answer. Why in the world would MS enable such a thing by *default*? Most
    emails that I get have some graphics in them, and it was getting pretty
    annoying seeing all those little red X's instead. Grrr!
    Hackworth, Sep 19, 2004
    #3
  4. "Hackworth" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    > "mentalguy2004" <> wrote in message
    > news:eek:%j3d.599$...
    >>
    >> "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    >> news:GVj3d.395897$...
    >>> OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the way
    >>> my OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of
    >>> placeholders and a small message at the top "Some pictures have been
    >>> blocked to help prevent the sender from identifying your computer. Click
    >>> here to download pictures." If I wanted to do this I could figure out
    >>> something myself!
    >>>
    >>> How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    >>>
    >>> Please advise.
    >>>
    >>> As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    >>>
    >>> - Bay0Wulf
    >>>

    >>
    >> In OE, go to "tools", "security" and uncheck the box "block images and
    >> other external content in html e-mail".

    >
    > I was going to post the very same question myself today! Many thanks for
    > the answer. Why in the world would MS enable such a thing by *default*?
    > Most emails that I get have some graphics in them, and it was getting
    > pretty annoying seeing all those little red X's instead. Grrr!
    >


    I think it's enabled by default because a lot of spam and/or virus mails
    come with external images & HTML embedded in the message. This means that
    not only are family PC's exposed to porn pictures, and viruses (virii??) but
    the spammers can keep logs of who viewed the images, this proves that the
    recipient has a valid e-mail address & consequently they are added to more
    spam lists. In the same way as unsuspecting users reply to the "unsubscribe"
    address, it only proves that you have a working address and guarantees you
    more and more spam.

    I prefer to keep the images off, and just click the bar for those mails I
    want to see the images inside. It's safer that way :)
    mentalguy2004, Sep 19, 2004
    #4
  5. Hackworth wrote:
    .....
    >> In OE, go to "tools", "security" and uncheck the box "block images and
    >> other external content in html e-mail".

    >
    > I was going to post the very same question myself today! Many thanks for
    > the answer. Why in the world would MS enable such a thing by *default*?
    > Most emails that I get have some graphics in them, and it was getting
    > pretty annoying seeing all those little red X's instead. Grrr!


    Links to external references in html mail are blocked by default (they could
    be webbugs and even malicious scripts), not included pictures.
    However, it'personal private mail, and not a website they sent you, isn't
    it?
    --
    Longhorn error#4711: TCPA / NGSCB VIOLATION: Microsoft optical mouse
    detected penguin patterns on mousepad. Partition scan in progress
     to remove offending incompatible products.  Reactivate your MS software.
    Linux woodpecker.homnet.at 2.6.8reiser4pkt [LinuxCounter#295241]
    Walter Mautner, Sep 19, 2004
    #5
  6. Bay0Wulf

    WormWood Guest

    Everyone posting in this thread so far has been woefully misinformed
    about and have under researched XP SP2, IE, OE and the way they
    function. So be it.

    --
    Bollocks


    "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    news:GVj3d.395897$...
    | OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the
    way my
    | OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders
    and a
    | small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    prevent
    | the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    pictures."
    | If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    |
    | How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    |
    | Please advise.
    |
    | As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    |
    | - Bay0Wulf
    |
    |
    WormWood, Sep 19, 2004
    #6
  7. "WormWood" <jojo@..com-de-com.com> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Everyone posting in this thread so far has been woefully misinformed
    > about and have under researched XP SP2, IE, OE and the way they
    > function. So be it.
    >
    > --
    > Bollocks
    >
    >
    > "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    > news:GVj3d.395897$...
    > | OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the
    > way my
    > | OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders
    > and a
    > | small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    > prevent
    > | the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    > pictures."
    > | If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    > |
    > | How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    > |
    > | Please advise.
    > |
    > | As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    > |
    > | - Bay0Wulf
    > |
    > |
    >
    >


    Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads still
    top-post. So be it.
    mentalguy2004, Sep 19, 2004
    #7
  8. "mentalguy2004" <> wrote in message
    news:kEm3d.937$...
    >
    > "WormWood" <jojo@..com-de-com.com> wrote in message
    > news:...
    >> Everyone posting in this thread so far has been woefully misinformed
    >> about and have under researched XP SP2, IE, OE and the way they
    >> function. So be it.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Bollocks
    >>
    >>
    >> "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    >> news:GVj3d.395897$...
    >> | OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the
    >> way my
    >> | OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders
    >> and a
    >> | small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    >> prevent
    >> | the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    >> pictures."
    >> | If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    >> |
    >> | How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    >> |
    >> | Please advise.
    >> |
    >> | As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    >> |
    >> | - Bay0Wulf
    >> |
    >> |
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads still
    > top-post. So be it.
    >


    and this is what MS themselves have to say:

    ------------------------------------------
    By default, Outlook Express blocks all HTML content that is referenced by an
    external location. Many spam senders include an image URL in their e-mail
    messages. The image URL notifies the spam sender's Web server when you open
    or preview the message. This kind of image URL is also known as a Web
    beacon. The following is a sample Web beacon:
    <img src=http://myserver/cgi-bin/program?e=your-e-mail-address-here>

    If you preview or open an e-mail message that contains this kind of an image
    reference, you may make your computer a target for more spam.
    ---------------------------------------

    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;843018
    mentalguy2004, Sep 19, 2004
    #8
  9. Bay0Wulf

    WormWood Guest

    I see the thought process has been pushed a wee bit further and now
    there is evidences of researching. Good on you.


    "mentalguy2004" <> wrote in message
    news:CGm3d.944$...
    |
    | "mentalguy2004" <> wrote in message
    | news:kEm3d.937$...
    | >
    | > "WormWood" <jojo@..com-de-com.com> wrote in message
    | > news:...
    | >> Everyone posting in this thread so far has been woefully
    misinformed
    | >> about and have under researched XP SP2, IE, OE and the way they
    | >> function. So be it.
    | >>
    | >> --
    | >> Bollocks
    | >>
    | >>
    | >> "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    | >> news:GVj3d.395897$...
    | >> | OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed
    the
    | >> way my
    | >> | OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of
    placeholders
    | >> and a
    | >> | small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    | >> prevent
    | >> | the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    | >> pictures."
    | >> | If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    | >> |
    | >> | How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    | >> |
    | >> | Please advise.
    | >> |
    | >> | As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    | >> |
    | >> | - Bay0Wulf
    | >> |
    | >> |
    | >>
    | >>
    | >
    | > Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads
    still
    | > top-post. So be it.
    | >
    |
    | and this is what MS themselves have to say:
    |
    | ------------------------------------------
    | By default, Outlook Express blocks all HTML content that is referenced
    by an
    | external location. Many spam senders include an image URL in their
    e-mail
    | messages. The image URL notifies the spam sender's Web server when you
    open
    | or preview the message. This kind of image URL is also known as a Web
    | beacon. The following is a sample Web beacon:
    | <img src=http://myserver/cgi-bin/program?e=your-e-mail-address-here>
    |
    | If you preview or open an e-mail message that contains this kind of an
    image
    | reference, you may make your computer a target for more spam.
    | ---------------------------------------
    |
    | http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;843018
    |
    |
    WormWood, Sep 19, 2004
    #9
  10. Bay0Wulf

    Glen Evans Guest

    get rid of sp2 its not compatiblewith a 64 bir computor
    "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    news:GVj3d.395897$...
    > OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the way

    my
    > OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders and

    a
    > small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help prevent
    > the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download

    pictures."
    > If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    >
    > How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    >
    > Please advise.
    >
    > As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    >
    > - Bay0Wulf
    >
    >
    Glen Evans, Sep 20, 2004
    #10
  11. ....and some idiots continue to bottom post to annoy the folks using
    text to speech readers. It makes them have to trawl the entire post
    again. Top posting has always been accepted in this group, simply for
    that reason. So STFU! and so be it!

    "mentalguy2004" <> chiseled in stone, the following words
    news:kEm3d.937$:
    <schnippen>
    > Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads
    > still top-post. So be it.


    --
    @}-}--}------Rosee http://www.cangogh.net/pix.html
    www.givemeals.com www.freedonation.com www.hungersite.com
    "This (TINT) is whatever I want it to be you bigfooted
    belligerent bowlegged babblative babuina."~Zigi~
    @}-}-------Rosee, Sep 20, 2004
    #11
  12. Bay0Wulf

    Bay0Wulf Guest

    I have both top posted here (I like this better actually) and bottom posted
    here (sometimes I find people even I can help) ... most corporate computer
    conversations read top posted. I do understand that lots of folks prefer
    bottom posting. I can't please everybody so I try to please myself.

    However, having said that ... Mr. Mental, thank you for resolving my issue.
    I am guessing that this is a new addition which is why I never saw it or
    made note of it.

    Thanks All, Y'All Be Happy & Well
    - Bay0Wulf

    "Glen Evans" <> wrote in message
    news:HPo3d.7120$...
    > get rid of sp2 its not compatiblewith a 64 bir computor
    > "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    > news:GVj3d.395897$...
    >> OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed the way

    > my
    >> OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of placeholders
    >> and

    > a
    >> small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help prevent
    >> the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download

    > pictures."
    >> If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    >>
    >> How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    >>
    >> Please advise.
    >>
    >> As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    >>
    >> - Bay0Wulf
    >>
    >>

    >
    >
    Bay0Wulf, Sep 20, 2004
    #12
  13. "WormWood" <jojo@..com-de-com.com> wrote in message
    news:...
    >I see the thought process has been pushed a wee bit further and now
    > there is evidences of researching. Good on you.
    >
    >
    > "mentalguy2004" <> wrote in message
    > news:CGm3d.944$...
    > |
    > | "mentalguy2004" <> wrote in message
    > | news:kEm3d.937$...
    > | >
    > | > "WormWood" <jojo@..com-de-com.com> wrote in message
    > | > news:...
    > | >> Everyone posting in this thread so far has been woefully
    > misinformed
    > | >> about and have under researched XP SP2, IE, OE and the way they
    > | >> function. So be it.
    > | >>
    > | >> --
    > | >> Bollocks
    > | >>
    > | >>
    > | >> "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    > | >> news:GVj3d.395897$...
    > | >> | OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed
    > the
    > | >> way my
    > | >> | OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of
    > placeholders
    > | >> and a
    > | >> | small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    > | >> prevent
    > | >> | the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    > | >> pictures."
    > | >> | If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    > | >> |
    > | >> | How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    > | >> |
    > | >> | Please advise.
    > | >> |
    > | >> | As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    > | >> |
    > | >> | - Bay0Wulf
    > | >> |
    > | >> |
    > | >>
    > | >>
    > | >
    > | > Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads
    > still
    > | > top-post. So be it.
    > | >
    > |
    > | and this is what MS themselves have to say:
    > |
    > | ------------------------------------------
    > | By default, Outlook Express blocks all HTML content that is referenced
    > by an
    > | external location. Many spam senders include an image URL in their
    > e-mail
    > | messages. The image URL notifies the spam sender's Web server when you
    > open
    > | or preview the message. This kind of image URL is also known as a Web
    > | beacon. The following is a sample Web beacon:
    > | <img src=http://myserver/cgi-bin/program?e=your-e-mail-address-here>
    > |
    > | If you preview or open an e-mail message that contains this kind of an
    > image
    > | reference, you may make your computer a target for more spam.
    > | ---------------------------------------
    > |
    > | http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;843018
    > |
    > |
    >
    >


    Not particularly, I just posted the link to information I had read prior to
    installing SP2, I still don't see any evidence of wrong information being
    given.
    mentalguy2004, Sep 20, 2004
    #13
  14. "@}-}-------Rosee" <!!GigAntiCBoSomS!!@Nip..com> wrote in message
    news:Xns9569C3C74B146roseeneener@216.196.97.140...
    > ...and some idiots continue to bottom post to annoy the folks using
    > text to speech readers. It makes them have to trawl the entire post
    > again. Top posting has always been accepted in this group, simply for
    > that reason. So STFU! and so be it!
    >
    > "mentalguy2004" <> chiseled in stone, the following words
    > news:kEm3d.937$:
    > <schnippen>
    >> Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads
    >> still top-post. So be it.

    >
    > --
    > @}-}--}------Rosee http://www.cangogh.net/pix.html
    > www.givemeals.com www.freedonation.com www.hungersite.com
    > "This (TINT) is whatever I want it to be you bigfooted
    > belligerent bowlegged babblative babuina."~Zigi~


    I don't think you'll find it's done to annoy anyone, it's just good practise
    to follow the format of the preceding threads in a particular discussion,
    otherwise it becomes very hard to follow.
    mentalguy2004, Sep 20, 2004
    #14
  15. Bay0Wulf

    WormWood Guest

    This is better, innit? btw, You give great advice...I even have some of
    your responses archived. Good day to you.


    "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    news:Nat3d.398685$...
    |I have both top posted here (I like this better actually) and bottom
    posted
    | here (sometimes I find people even I can help) ... most corporate
    computer
    | conversations read top posted. I do understand that lots of folks
    prefer
    | bottom posting. I can't please everybody so I try to please myself.
    |
    | However, having said that ... Mr. Mental, thank you for resolving my
    issue.
    | I am guessing that this is a new addition which is why I never saw it
    or
    | made note of it.
    |
    | Thanks All, Y'All Be Happy & Well
    | - Bay0Wulf
    |
    | "Glen Evans" <> wrote in message
    | news:HPo3d.7120$...
    | > get rid of sp2 its not compatiblewith a 64 bir computor
    | > "Bay0Wulf" <> wrote in message
    | > news:GVj3d.395897$...
    | >> OK so ... in the new XP SP2 there was something that has changed
    the way
    | > my
    | >> OE works. Now when I select a piece of mail I get alot of
    placeholders
    | >> and
    | > a
    | >> small message at the top "Some pictures have been blocked to help
    prevent
    | >> the sender from identifying your computer. Click here to download
    | > pictures."
    | >> If I wanted to do this I could figure out something myself!
    | >>
    | >> How do I get rid of this new wonderful "fix"?
    | >>
    | >> Please advise.
    | >>
    | >> As always, thank-you for your assistance past & present"
    | >>
    | >> - Bay0Wulf
    | >>
    | >>
    | >
    | >
    |
    |
    WormWood, Sep 20, 2004
    #15
  16. It may be hard to follow for ignorant people, so I'll just leave it at
    that. It is even better practice to follow what is accepted in a
    particular newsgroup. YOU don't get to dictate what is good practice
    in this group. So I'll say again, STFU about top posting!

    "mentalguy2004" <> chiseled in stone, the following words
    news:hTw3d.1215$:

    > "@}-}-------Rosee" wrote...
    >> ...and some idiots continue to bottom post to annoy the folks using
    >> text to speech readers. It makes them have to trawl the entire post
    >> again. Top posting has always been accepted in this group, simply
    >> for that reason. So STFU! and so be it!


    >> "mentalguy2004" chiseled in stone, the following words:
    >> <schnippen>
    >>> Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads
    >>> still top-post. So be it.


    > I don't think you'll find it's done to annoy anyone, it's just good
    > practise to follow the format of the preceding threads in a particular
    > discussion, otherwise it becomes very hard to follow.


    --
    @}-}--}------Rosee http://www.cangogh.net/pix.html
    www.givemeals.com www.freedonation.com www.hungersite.com
    "This (TINT) is whatever I want it to be you bigfooted
    belligerent bowlegged babblative babuina."~Zigi~
    @}-}-------Rosee, Sep 20, 2004
    #16
  17. "@}-}-------Rosee" <!!GigAntiCBoSomS!!@Nip..com> wrote in message
    news:Xns956A8AB9CB05Froseeneener@216.196.97.140...
    > It may be hard to follow for ignorant people, so I'll just leave it at
    > that. It is even better practice to follow what is accepted in a
    > particular newsgroup. YOU don't get to dictate what is good practice
    > in this group. So I'll say again, STFU about top posting!
    >
    > "mentalguy2004" <> chiseled in stone, the following words
    > news:hTw3d.1215$:
    >
    >> "@}-}-------Rosee" wrote...
    >>> ...and some idiots continue to bottom post to annoy the folks using
    >>> text to speech readers. It makes them have to trawl the entire post
    >>> again. Top posting has always been accepted in this group, simply
    >>> for that reason. So STFU! and so be it!

    >
    >>> "mentalguy2004" chiseled in stone, the following words:
    >>> <schnippen>
    >>>> Maybe so, but his issue has been resolved, meanwhile some dickheads
    >>>> still top-post. So be it.

    >
    >> I don't think you'll find it's done to annoy anyone, it's just good
    >> practise to follow the format of the preceding threads in a particular
    >> discussion, otherwise it becomes very hard to follow.

    >
    > --
    > @}-}--}------Rosee http://www.cangogh.net/pix.html
    > www.givemeals.com www.freedonation.com www.hungersite.com
    > "This (TINT) is whatever I want it to be you bigfooted
    > belligerent bowlegged babblative babuina."~Zigi~


    Who gives a shit what you think? Apart from you? You and your text-to-speech
    newsreader can go and get fucked. OK? Bye now.
    mentalguy2004, Sep 20, 2004
    #17
  18. <guffaw>

    Awwwww....would like cheese with that whine? Or fries?

    ....and by all rights, who gives a shit what you think either? Go take
    your meds, as *I* don't use a text to speech reader. My vision is just
    fine. I am just considerate of other people, something of which, you in
    your infinite ignorance, couldn't find that concept if it hit you in your
    frontal lobe. Your nym fits you well....

    "mentalguy2004" <> chiseled in stone, the following words
    news:KzF3d.102$:

    > "@}-}-------Rosee" wrote...
    >> It may be hard to follow for ignorant people, so I'll just leave it
    >> at that. It is even better practice to follow what is accepted in a
    >> particular newsgroup. YOU don't get to dictate what is good practice
    >> in this group. So I'll say again, STFU about top posting!


    <schnippen>

    > Who gives a shit what you think? Apart from you? You and your
    > text-to-speech newsreader can go and get fucked. OK? Bye now.


    --
    @}-}--}------Rosee http://www.cangogh.net/pix.html
    www.givemeals.com www.freedonation.com www.hungersite.com
    "This (TINT) is whatever I want it to be you bigfooted
    belligerent bowlegged babblative babuina."~Zigi~
    @}-}-------Rosee, Sep 20, 2004
    #18
  19. @}-}-------Rosee wrote:

    >> "@}-}-------Rosee" wrote...
    >>> ...and some idiots continue to bottom post to annoy the folks using
    >>> text to speech readers. It makes them have to trawl the entire post
    >>> again. Top posting has always been accepted in this group, simply
    >>> for that reason. So STFU! and so be it!


    > > "mentalguy2004" <> chiseled in stone, the following words

    > news:hTw3d.1215$:
    >
    >> I don't think you'll find it's done to annoy anyone, it's just good
    >> practise to follow the format of the preceding threads in a particular
    >> discussion, otherwise it becomes very hard to follow.

    >
    > It may be hard to follow for ignorant people, so I'll just leave it at
    > that. It is even better practice to follow what is accepted in a
    > particular newsgroup. YOU don't get to dictate what is good practice
    > in this group. So I'll say again, STFU about top posting!
    >

    Which means another feed for my killfile.
    Now, top posting _and_ quoting the whole text isn't only a sign of
    ignorance, it's also plain stupid. So if you _have_to_ do your homework for
    the readers of your posts (and most people giving useful hints, will agree
    in that it's a written _discussion_ here, and therefore has to follow
    discussion rules) anyway by snipping irrelevant parts, you may as well
    leave the cursor where you want to reply to, and continue typing there.
    It's more simple then top-posting and _not_ fullquoting.
    Once again, company e-mailing is NOT comparable to a DISCUSSION forum.
    Now get lost.
    --
    Longhorn error#4711: TCPA / NGSCB VIOLATION: Microsoft optical mouse
    detected penguin patterns on mousepad. Partition scan in progress
     to remove offending incompatible products.  Reactivate your MS software.
    Linux woodpecker.homnet.at 2.6.8reiser4pkt [LinuxCounter#295241]
    Walter Mautner, Sep 20, 2004
    #19
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Norbert Dentressangle

    Outlook Express and SP2

    Norbert Dentressangle, Sep 27, 2004, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,237
    Norbert Dentressangle
    Sep 28, 2004
  2. Emmy

    SP2 & Outlook Express

    Emmy, Oct 13, 2004, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    468
  3. Arnold H. Hollander

    Outlook and Outlook Express Problem

    Arnold H. Hollander, Oct 24, 2004, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    749
  4. Robert11
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,470
    sherlockolms
    Apr 6, 2007
  5. Marc
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    1,532
    John Holmes
    Aug 22, 2006
Loading...

Share This Page