One key thing missing from Dpreview and P7000 info

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by RichA, Sep 9, 2010.

  1. RichA

    RichA Guest

    To their preview for this new Nikon. High-end compacts of years ago
    didn't have TINY sensors, they had 2/3" sensors considerably larger
    than the ones in any compact now. Had they kept up with the same
    sensors, with new technology and processing, they might have had
    something. As it is, compacts are still lame compared to ANY DSLR,
    including units that are CHEAPER than the overpriced compacts in
    question.

    http://dpreview.com/previews/nikonp7000/
     
    RichA, Sep 9, 2010
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. RichA

    Irwell Guest

    On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:26:49 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:

    > To their preview for this new Nikon. High-end compacts of years ago
    > didn't have TINY sensors, they had 2/3" sensors considerably larger
    > than the ones in any compact now. Had they kept up with the same
    > sensors, with new technology and processing, they might have had
    > something. As it is, compacts are still lame compared to ANY DSLR,
    > including units that are CHEAPER than the overpriced compacts in
    > question.
    >
    > http://dpreview.com/previews/nikonp7000/


    Is this what you had in mind.
    http://www.dpreview.com/news/9903/99031802olyslr.asp
     
    Irwell, Sep 9, 2010
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. RichA

    RichA Guest

    On Sep 9, 11:53 am, Irwell <> wrote:
    > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:26:49 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:
    > > To their preview for this new Nikon.  High-end compacts of years ago
    > > didn't have TINY sensors, they had 2/3" sensors considerably larger
    > > than the ones in any compact now.  Had they kept up with the same
    > > sensors, with new technology and processing, they might have had
    > > something.  As it is, compacts are still lame compared to ANY DSLR,
    > > including units that are CHEAPER than the overpriced compacts in
    > > question.

    >
    > >http://dpreview.com/previews/nikonp7000/

    >
    > Is this what you had in mind.http://www.dpreview.com/news/9903/99031802olyslr.asp


    This is the finest P&S (apart from Sony's R1) ever made with the 2/3"
    sensor. It's low ISO images were terrific (though lacking in DR in
    some situations) because it had an amazing lens. Had they kept this
    quality, you'd have an 8 megapixel, 2/3" sensored camera with modern
    processing. Problem was, this camera was almost $1000 when it came
    out owing to its build and lens quality so DSLRs still win.

    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Olympus/oly_c8080wz.asp
     
    RichA, Sep 9, 2010
    #3
  4. RichA

    Bruce Guest

    RichA <> wrote:
    >This is the finest P&S (apart from Sony's R1) ever made with the 2/3"
    >sensor. It's low ISO images were terrific (though lacking in DR in
    >some situations) because it had an amazing lens. Had they kept this
    >quality, you'd have an 8 megapixel, 2/3" sensored camera with modern
    >processing. Problem was, this camera was almost $1000 when it came
    >out owing to its build and lens quality so DSLRs still win.
    >http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Olympus/oly_c8080wz.asp



    But the Sony DSC-R1 had an almost APS-C size sensor!

    Olympus C8080WZ sensor size: 8.80 x 6.60 mm
    Sony DSC-R1 sensor size: 21.5 x 14.4 mm
    Olympus sensor area: 0.58 cm2
    Sony sensor area: 3.09 cm2.

    The Sony R1 sensor is 5.33 times the size of the Olympus sensor.

    Perhaps you were thinking of the Sony DSC-F828, which had the same
    size sensor as the Olympus C8080WZ? Of course both these cameras had
    *very noisy* sensors.
     
    Bruce, Sep 10, 2010
    #4
  5. RichA

    Eric Stevens Guest

    On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:53:20 -0700, Irwell <> wrote:

    >On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:26:49 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:
    >
    >> To their preview for this new Nikon. High-end compacts of years ago
    >> didn't have TINY sensors, they had 2/3" sensors considerably larger
    >> than the ones in any compact now. Had they kept up with the same
    >> sensors, with new technology and processing, they might have had
    >> something. As it is, compacts are still lame compared to ANY DSLR,
    >> including units that are CHEAPER than the overpriced compacts in
    >> question.
    >>
    >> http://dpreview.com/previews/nikonp7000/

    >
    >Is this what you had in mind.
    >http://www.dpreview.com/news/9903/99031802olyslr.asp


    or maybe http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscf707/ ?
    I still regret selling mine.



    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Sep 10, 2010
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. no-spam
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    1,247
    Serengeti
    Jul 29, 2003
  2. Doug MacLean
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    541
    Derek Janssen
    Feb 10, 2004
  3. ThomasH

    Minox missing on Dpreview...

    ThomasH, Aug 20, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    407
    ThomasH
    Aug 21, 2005
  4. Replies:
    2
    Views:
    377
  5. Richard

    Pixelview PLAY TV@P7000

    Richard, Jun 10, 2004, in forum: NZ Computing
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    397
Loading...

Share This Page