Nikon D2X: Full In-Depth Review

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by deryck lant, Jun 2, 2005.

  1. deryck  lant

    deryck lant Guest

    deryck lant, Jun 2, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. deryck  lant

    Guest

    Perhaps we should balance your unbounding enthusiasm (=spam?), by
    quoting some of the bad side... I acknowledge in advance that:
    - I am selectively quoting...
    - Some of these issues and timings are pretty good actually (but
    certainly not 'almost perfect' IMO)...
    - At least one problem (dirt on sensor) applies to *almost* all
    DSLR's..


    >From Steve's Digicams

    http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/d2x_pg11.html
    =============================================================

    The D2X is a big and heavy camera..
    ...
    It took me some time to adjust to composing the cropped image; old
    habits, like assuming that the entire viewfinder image will be
    captured, are hard to break, and I often found that I had cropped out
    important elements of the image.
    ...
    Auto focus shutter lag ranged from 1/10 to 3/10 second
    ...
    This exceeded Nikons spec of 5 fps, but failed to attain the claimed
    depth of 22 shots.
    ...
    The D2X does not continue to shoot at a reduced rate once the buffer
    fills; you must remove your finger from the shutter button and
    re-depress it to continue.
    ...
    Using the uncompressed NEF format, the D2X captured 17 images in 2.8
    seconds, taking 50 seconds to clear the buffer completely; compressed
    NEF images were captured at the same rate and depth, but took only 31
    seconds for buffer clearing. The D2X supports the TIFF format, but
    you'll probably avoid using it; while it captured 16 images in 2.6
    seconds, buffer clearing took a whopping 8 minutes 48 seconds!
    ...
    Shooting Large Fine JPEG images, it captured 34 images in 3.8 seconds,
    and took 18 seconds to clear its buffer. This exceeded Nikons spec of 8
    fps, but failed to attain the claimed depth of 35 shots.
    It captured 28 TIFF images in 3.1 seconds, but took an agonizing 16
    minutes to clear its buffer.
    ...
    ...image noise was present in shadow areas at ISO sensitivities as low
    as 200, and growing to a quite noticeable level at ISO 800. The D2X
    includes a High ISO Noise Reduction feature that can be activated in
    the camera's menu system; this in-camera noise processing does diminish
    the amount of noise, but at the expense of image detail. At ISO
    settings of HI-1 (ISO 1600) and HI-2 (ISO 3200), shadow noise is very
    high even with the use of High ISO Noise Reduction.
    ...
    Nikon Capture 4 completes the D2X's total imaging package, and I don't
    understand why Nikon did not bundle it with the camera.
    ...
    The most common and annoying problem is keeping the CCD imager clean.
    ...
    I am a bit disappointed with the shadow noise present in images taken
    at ISO 200 and above. Nikon attempted to mitigate the problem with
    their in-camera High ISO Noise reduction feature, but its effectiveness
    is only fair and you lose image detail as a result... photojournalists
    and sports shooters who need the camera's full range of sensitivity
    should carefully evaluate the D2X's image noise before parting with
    $5000.


    >From DPReview http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond2x/page28.asp

    =============================================================

    * Higher noise at ISO 1600 and 3200 than we would hope (with NR off)
    * Smaller default sensitivity range (ISO 100 to 800) than other digital
    SLR's
    * Inaccurate color response from LCD monitor (green hue shift in reds)
    * Disappointing automatic white balance performance under artificial
    light
    * Some photographers will miss IEEE 1394 (FireWire)
    * White balance recorded in RAW file not available to some converters
    * Very poor memory management and performance from optional Nikon
    Capture
    , Jun 2, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. deryck  lant

    deryck lant Guest

    The message <>
    from contains these words:

    > Perhaps we should balance your unbounding enthusiasm (=spam?), by
    > quoting some of the bad side... I acknowledge in advance that:
    > - I am selectively quoting...
    > - Some of these issues and timings are pretty good actually (but
    > certainly not 'almost perfect' IMO)...
    > - At least one problem (dirt on sensor) applies to *almost* all
    > DSLR's..


    The 'unbounding enthusiasm' was an opinion from Phil Askey. His website
    www.dpreview.com reviews are considered the most well balanced
    and unbiased available. The 29 page review devoted to the D2x can
    certainly be considered in-depth.

    His closing remark that he is considering buying the D2X is remarkable
    because he was a devoted Canon fan.

    Deryck
    deryck lant, Jun 2, 2005
    #3
  4. deryck  lant

    Bill Hilton Guest

    > Deryck writes ...
    >
    >The 'unbounding enthusiasm' was an opinion from Phil Askey ...
    >His closing remark that he is considering buying the D2X is
    >remarkable because he was a devoted Canon fan.


    I'm also a "Canon fan" who owns a 1Ds and two 1D MII's and while I'm
    definitely not considering buying a D2x I think Nikon did a really nice
    job with it. If I had Nikon lenses I'd definitely be using the D2x.

    Bill
    Bill Hilton, Jun 2, 2005
    #4
  5. deryck  lant

    Ross Garrett Guest

    "Bill Hilton" <> wrote in message
    news:...

    > I'm also a "Canon fan" who owns a 1Ds and two 1D MII's and while I'm
    > definitely not considering buying a D2x I think Nikon did a really nice
    > job with it. If I had Nikon lenses I'd definitely be using the D2x.


    You know Bill..........measured, cogent replies are simply not appreciated
    :^)
    Ross Garrett, Jun 2, 2005
    #5
  6. deryck  lant

    Guest

    Actually, measured cogent replies are *greatly* appreciated.

    But just saying, 'Golly I'd love one of those'...? Well, to me, that
    isn't all that measured or cogent - am I strange for thinking that? I
    would much rather hear a list of the good stuff, and a list of the bad
    stuff.

    Not everyone shoots the same, not everyone values the same features.
    Some of those obviously 'unimportant' issues might just be the deal
    breaker for me, or at least make me wait a bit longer yet.. For
    example, call me weird, but a DSLR without some form of sensor
    cleaning/protection will never make it into my camera bag.
    , Jun 3, 2005
    #6
  7. deryck  lant

    Skip M Guest

    "Bill Hilton" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >> Deryck writes ...
    >>
    >>The 'unbounding enthusiasm' was an opinion from Phil Askey ...
    >>His closing remark that he is considering buying the D2X is
    >>remarkable because he was a devoted Canon fan.

    >
    > I'm also a "Canon fan" who owns a 1Ds and two 1D MII's and while I'm
    > definitely not considering buying a D2x I think Nikon did a really nice
    > job with it. If I had Nikon lenses I'd definitely be using the D2x.
    >
    > Bill
    >

    Or if I had fewer Canon lenses...

    --
    Skip Middleton
    http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
    Skip M, Jun 3, 2005
    #7
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. TAFKAB

    First Nikon D2X review!

    TAFKAB, Dec 1, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    22
    Views:
    807
    nick c
    Dec 3, 2004
  2. deryck  lant

    Nikon D2x: Review by Thom Hogan

    deryck lant, May 4, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    537
    Tom Scales
    May 4, 2005
  3. Alan Browne

    Nikon D2X review

    Alan Browne, Jun 1, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    487
    Philip Homburg
    Jun 2, 2005
  4. gnnyman
    Replies:
    13
    Views:
    782
    Scott W
    Jul 5, 2005
  5. deryck  lant

    Nikon D50: In-depth Technical Review

    deryck lant, Aug 14, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    332
    deryck lant
    Aug 14, 2005
Loading...

Share This Page