Nat-traversal alternative?

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by John Tressle, Mar 17, 2007.

  1. John Tressle

    John Tressle Guest

    We have a PIX 501 running 6.2 and are having problems with some clients
    connecting via VPN that are behind wireless routers. They are able to
    connect but cannot ping anything on the internal network. From doing some
    research - it seems like the solution is the nat-traversal but unfortunately
    that command is only available in 6.3 and later.

    Is there anything else I can do to get this working or is it time to buy a
    new firewall? Any help appreciated!

    Cheers,
    John
    John Tressle, Mar 17, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. John Tressle

    Brian V Guest

    "John Tressle" <> wrote in message
    news:HVZKh.40$...
    > We have a PIX 501 running 6.2 and are having problems with some clients
    > connecting via VPN that are behind wireless routers. They are able to
    > connect but cannot ping anything on the internal network. From doing some
    > research - it seems like the solution is the nat-traversal but
    > unfortunately that command is only available in 6.3 and later.
    >
    > Is there anything else I can do to get this working or is it time to buy a
    > new firewall? Any help appreciated!
    >
    > Cheers,
    > John


    Why not just up it to 6.3(5)? Search around, lot's of vulnerabilities out
    there which makes you eligible for the upgrade. Provided of course you
    bought the 501 new and not used somewhere.
    Brian V, Mar 18, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. cci admin

    nat traversal or something else

    cci admin, Apr 22, 2004, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    3,375
    cci admin
    Apr 22, 2004
  2. AM
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,662
  3. LLFF

    ISAKMP nat-traversal ?

    LLFF, Nov 28, 2005, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    9,645
    Walter Roberson
    Nov 28, 2005
  4. Sako

    doubts about nat-traversal

    Sako, Feb 6, 2006, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,220
    Walter Roberson
    Feb 7, 2006
  5. =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Iwaszko?=

    NAT Traversal.

    =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Iwaszko?=, Feb 21, 2006, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    13,485
    Walter Roberson
    Feb 22, 2006
Loading...

Share This Page