Microsoft Getting Fat & Middle-Aged

Discussion in 'NZ Computing' started by Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Oct 28, 2005.

  1. Interesting article at Forbes
    <http://www.forbes.com/business/global/2005/1003/036A.html> about the
    current state of Microsoft. Did you that Microsoft's Dimdows and Office
    divisions account for 140% of its profits? That means that its XBOX, mobile
    and other smaller divisions are losing nearly a _third_ of the money being
    made by the big two. The XBOX division alone is losing a billion dollars a
    year.

    Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce.com, which is currently eating Microsoft's
    lunch in the CRM market, gleefully proclaims that "Microsoft is a vestige
    of the past".

    Gabe Newell, who worked on Dimdows versions up to 3.something, says
    "Microsoft has become what it used to mock ... [back in the 1980s] We
    laughed at IBM. They had all this process for monitoring productivity, and
    yet we knew they had spectacularly bad productivity. That's Microsoft now".

    Ballmer tried to set up an organizational structure to improve
    accountability, but the main result has been "competition for resources":

    The seven divisions act as rival fiefs, pursuing overlapping
    technologies and warring over whose code will prevail in the spaces
    where different divisions' products interact. "Windows and Office would
    never let MSN have more budget or more control," says Mark Jen,who quit
    Microsoft eight months ago. "MSNe-mail should talk to Office Calendar
    contacts and share appointments from Office with friends and family on
    the Web. But then MSNcould cannibalize Office." (Microsoft insists its
    Office and MSN features work well together.)

    He has also put in place regular internal surveys and management/employee
    meetings to arrange "commitment" targets to boost employee skills which are
    measured in performance reviews, but it appears this just adds more
    bureaucratic deadweight.

    Longhorn/Vista was initially supposed to be out in 2003. Then 2005.
    Currently it's scheduled for the end of next year, but some analysts say
    2007 is more likely. One reason is that employees are continually bogged
    down in "reviews" that involve generating reams of PowerPoint slides. Also,
    practically nothing can be done without getting approval from a lawyer.

    One reason why Microsoft was caught flat-footed over desktop search was that
    3 different groups were working on a tool to do this, so naturally there
    were political issues over whose ideas would prevail.

    I think this quote nicely illustrates how out of touch Ballmer is:

    "You could say 1995 to 2000 was about us winning on the desktop. Then
    2000 to 2005 we won and drove the server market. And the next five years
    is all about driving and winning the Web".
     
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Oct 28, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. George W. W.

    Rose Marie (aged ?)

    George W. W., Sep 18, 2004, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    11
    Views:
    702
    rose marie
    Sep 20, 2004
  2. Jasen

    Aged Film colour problem

    Jasen, Nov 21, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    362
    Jasen
    Nov 22, 2005
  3. RichA
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    278
    Paul Heslop
    Jul 2, 2010
  4. Peter

    Re: Fat lenses can be fat targets

    Peter, Jul 3, 2010, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    12
    Views:
    587
    David Kerber
    Aug 10, 2010
  5. Robert Coe

    Re: Fat lenses can be fat targets

    Robert Coe, Jul 4, 2010, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    444
    John McWilliams
    Jul 4, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page