MCSE, MCP+I in NT 4.0 still accredited?

Discussion in 'MCSE' started by Filthy Rich, Aug 12, 2003.

  1. Filthy Rich

    Filthy Rich Guest

    I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back in 1999.

    Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on my business
    cards and letterheads?



    Filthy Rich
    Music House
     
    Filthy Rich, Aug 12, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Depends on what your electives were. The IIS3 exam is no longer credited, so
    if you did IIS4 then you shoudl still be OK.

    "Filthy Rich" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back in 1999.
    >
    > Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on my business
    > cards and letterheads?
    >
    >
    >
    > Filthy Rich
    > Music House
     
    Brendon Rogers, Aug 12, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Filthy Rich

    Ron Williams Guest

    Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
    generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
    take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
    dont carry over.

    good luck to you..

    >-----Original Message-----
    >I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back

    in 1999.
    >
    >Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on

    my business
    >cards and letterheads?
    >
    >
    >
    >Filthy Rich
    >Music House
    >.
    >
     
    Ron Williams, Aug 12, 2003
    #3
  4. Possibly incorrect Ron.

    It depends entirely on what exams he did for the NT4 MCSE.

    From: http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcp/mcse/faq.asp

    Q. I was an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0. One of my elective exams, Exam 70-077:
    Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Internet Information Server 3.0 and
    Microsoft Index Server 1.1, was discontinued on June 30, 2000, and I did not
    pass a current replacement exam before the June 30, 2001, deadline. Am I
    still certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0?

    A. You are no longer certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0. To be
    certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0, you must have met both the core and
    elective requirements for NT 4.0. Exam 70-077 was discontinued in June 2000
    as part of the Windows NT 3.51 exam discontinuations. If you did not meet
    the upgrade requirements for Exam 70-077 by June 30, 2001, then you are no
    longer certified on Windows NT 4.0. See Discontinuation of Exams for more
    information.


    Q. In the case above, if I now pass a current MCSE elective exam to replace
    discontinued Exam 70-077, will I be certified again?

    A. Yes, if you pass a current MCSE elective now, you will again be
    certified as an MCSE on Windows NT 4.0. Please see the MCSE on Windows NT
    4.0 requirements page for details on electives that are currently available.



    "Ron Williams" <> wrote in message
    news:044d01c3611f$30121e00$...
    > Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
    > generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
    > take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
    > dont carry over.
    >
    > good luck to you..
    >
    > >-----Original Message-----
    > >I got my MCSE and MCP + Internet in Windows NT 4.0 back

    > in 1999.
    > >
    > >Am I still allowed to use the MCSE and MCP+ Internet on

    > my business
    > >cards and letterheads?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >Filthy Rich
    > >Music House
    > >.
    > >
     
    Brendon Rogers, Aug 13, 2003
    #4
  5. Filthy Rich

    |{evin Guest

    On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:15:07 -0700, "Ron Williams"
    <> wrote:

    >Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
    >generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
    >take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
    >dont carry over.
    >
    >good luck to you..


    Another thing... can you stop with the ass-backwards posting? Do you
    answer people in person before they ask you a question?


    A: Top posters
    Q: What's one of the most annoying things on usenet?
     
    |{evin, Aug 13, 2003
    #5
  6. Filthy Rich

    Consultant Guest

    i resent that ;-)

    "|{evin" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:15:07 -0700, "Ron Williams"
    > <> wrote:
    >
    > >Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
    > >generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
    > >take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
    > >dont carry over.
    > >
    > >good luck to you..

    >
    > Another thing... can you stop with the ass-backwards posting? Do you
    > answer people in person before they ask you a question?
    >
    >
    > A: Top posters
    > Q: What's one of the most annoying things on usenet?
    >
     
    Consultant, Aug 13, 2003
    #6
  7. Filthy Rich

    Maestro Guest

    Who the f*ck do you think that you are to dictate how
    anyone post in this newsgroup. If you don't like the way
    they're posted, skip em. Perhaps you're ass backwards!
    Some of the crap complained about in here borders on
    ridiculous. If that's the only thing you have to worry
    about you're living a divine life. You bottom posting...
    oh nevermind.

    >-----Original Message-----
    >On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:15:07 -0700, "Ron Williams"
    ><> wrote:
    >
    >>Yes you are. But many are upgrading to the 2000, 2003
    >>generation. if you decide to upgrade, you will have to
    >>take the whole 2003 track...most of the NT4.0 classes
    >>dont carry over.
    >>
    >>good luck to you..

    >
    >Another thing... can you stop with the ass-backwards

    posting? Do you
    >answer people in person before they ask you a question?
    >
    >
    >A: Top posters
    >Q: What's one of the most annoying things on usenet?
    >
    >.
    >
     
    Maestro, Aug 13, 2003
    #7
  8. "Maestro" <> wrote in message
    news:09bd01c361b2$28b21be0$...
    > Who the f*ck do you think that you are to dictate how
    > anyone post in this newsgroup.


    He was not dictating, he was asking.

    > If you don't like the way
    > they're posted, skip em.


    That would be fine if there was some way to know before opening the post
    that it was top-posted. I don't see to many subject lines with [Warning:
    Top poster] included.

    > Perhaps you're ass backwards!


    Do you read from bottom to top? Do you also read from right to left?
    Shalom!

    > Some of the crap complained about in here borders on
    > ridiculous. If that's the only thing you have to worry
    > about you're living a divine life. You bottom posting...
    > oh nevermind.


    We'll cross that border someday. Stay tuned.


    --
    Fris "Please, Mr. Postman" beeĀ® MCNGP #13

    http://www.mcngp.tk
    The MCNGP Team - We're here to help
     
    =?iso-8859-1?Q?Frisbee=AE_MCNGP?=, Aug 13, 2003
    #8
  9. Filthy Rich

    Jtyc Guest

    Your inline posting is difficult to read. Please refrain from doing so in
    the future. Or if possible create a diagram so that I may better follow
    your discussion.

    Thank you.
     
    Jtyc, Aug 13, 2003
    #9
  10. Filthy Rich

    Jtyc Guest

    > k

    Your ready complience offends me. Please refrain from being so easy going
    in the future.


    Thank you.
     
    Jtyc, Aug 13, 2003
    #10
  11. Filthy Rich

    billyw Guest

    top posting/ bottom posting.. it's really the content that matters..
    hmmm, well you know what i mean

    "Maestro" <> wrote in message
    news:01cc01c361ba$82a0bf50$...
    I went off on a rant, but my only real point was that
    there are some that prefer top posting and have their
    reasons and some that prefer bottom posting and have their
    reasons. Neither is right or wrong regardless of our
    personal opinions. It made no sense to me to attack the
    previous poster for being a top poster. No I don't read
    bottom to top, but at the same time if I already know
    what's been posted I don't want to have to scroll through
    a bunch of old stuff to get to the new stuff. That may
    not make sense to you and that's fine. Like I said we
    have preferences (reasons).

    As a side note though, if I had my way top posting would
    be the law... :)

    >-----Original Message-----
    >"Maestro" <> wrote in message
    >news:09bd01c361b2$28b21be0$...
    >> Who the f*ck do you think that you are to dictate how
    >> anyone post in this newsgroup.

    >
    >He was not dictating, he was asking.
    >
    >> If you don't like the way
    >> they're posted, skip em.

    >
    >That would be fine if there was some way to know before

    opening the post
    >that it was top-posted. I don't see to many subject

    lines with [Warning:
    >Top poster] included.
    >
    >> Perhaps you're ass backwards!

    >
    >Do you read from bottom to top? Do you also read from

    right to left?
    >Shalom!
    >
    >> Some of the crap complained about in here borders on
    >> ridiculous. If that's the only thing you have to worry
    >> about you're living a divine life. You bottom

    posting...
    >> oh nevermind.

    >
    >We'll cross that border someday. Stay tuned.
    >
    >
    >--
    >Fris "Please, Mr. Postman" beeĀ® MCNGP #13
    >
    >http://www.mcngp.tk
    >The MCNGP Team - We're here to help
    >
    >.
    >
     
    billyw, Aug 13, 2003
    #11
  12. Filthy Rich

    |{evin Guest

    On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:01:28 -0700, "Consultant"
    <> wrote:

    >i resent that ;-)
    >


    Hehehe.. but you do, knowing it's wrong,. just to be a butt... he's
    doing it because he's clueless.
     
    |{evin, Aug 13, 2003
    #12
  13. Filthy Rich

    |{evin Guest

    On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:46:57 -0700, "Maestro" <>
    wrote:


    >As a side note though, if I had my way top posting would
    >be the law... :)


    Thank goodness you don't have your way. The millions of people who
    know how to post properly would likely try to hunt you down and 'show
    you the way'
     
    |{evin, Aug 13, 2003
    #13
  14. Filthy Rich

    Maestro Guest

    No, because I'd send them all to Top Posting Bootcamp.

    >-----Original Message-----
    >On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:46:57 -0700, "Maestro"

    <>
    >wrote:
    >
    >
    >>As a side note though, if I had my way top posting would
    >>be the law... :)

    >
    >Thank goodness you don't have your way. The millions of

    people who
    >know how to post properly would likely try to hunt you

    down and 'show
    >you the way'
    >
    >.
    >
     
    Maestro, Aug 14, 2003
    #14
  15. Filthy Rich

    Consultant Guest

    true, true

    "|{evin" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:01:28 -0700, "Consultant"
    > <> wrote:
    >
    > >i resent that ;-)
    > >

    >
    > Hehehe.. but you do, knowing it's wrong,. just to be a butt... he's
    > doing it because he's clueless.
    >
     
    Consultant, Aug 14, 2003
    #15
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. BuGzY
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    398
    BuGzY
    Oct 2, 2003
  2. Burgess, Patrick

    MCP # from MCSE NT4.0 still valid?

    Burgess, Patrick, Jun 3, 2008, in forum: MCSE
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    1,183
    Wayne
    Jun 10, 2008
  3. navaho
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,588
    Kline Sphere
    Jun 30, 2008
  4. Dusty M
    Replies:
    16
    Views:
    1,105
  5. Ryan Webb
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    510
Loading...

Share This Page