MCSE 2003 + MCSE 2003 Security

Discussion in 'MCSE' started by =?Utf-8?B?SW5vZmZlbnNpdmU=?=, Aug 8, 2006.

  1. Hi,

    I've passed 70-270/70-290/70-291/70-293. Next up are 70-294/70-297/70-089
    and I'd have MCSE 2003.

    I'd also like to have MCSE Security. I'd take 70-298/70-299/70-350 in
    addition. On a resume, would I mention MCSE 2003 and MCSE 2003 Security
    separately or just include MCSE 2003 Security?

    Thanks.
     
    =?Utf-8?B?SW5vZmZlbnNpdmU=?=, Aug 8, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. =?Utf-8?B?SW5vZmZlbnNpdmU=?=

    BD [MCNGP] Guest

    >>Did you see what Inoffensive ()
    graced us with in ?<<
    > Hi,
    >
    > I've passed 70-270/70-290/70-291/70-293. Next up are
    > 70-294/70-297/70-089 and I'd have MCSE 2003.
    >
    > I'd also like to have MCSE Security. I'd take 70-298/70-299/70-350 in
    > addition. On a resume, would I mention MCSE 2003 and MCSE 2003
    > Security separately or just include MCSE 2003 Security?
    >
    > Thanks.
    >

    Just an opinion here, but I would see having MCSE2003 and MCSE2003+Security as
    being redundant. Redundancy is inefficient, Inefficiency is Lame, Lameness is
    Stupid, and Stupidity is not what people are looking to hire.

    --
    BD
    MCNGP #51
    -- MCNGP.com - You know IT!?
    -- www.CertGuard.com; www.SWPPM.com
     
    BD [MCNGP], Aug 8, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. I'd also add - Don't take 297. Use 298 instead that way you wont have to
    take 2 design exams.

    --
    ..rev - mct.mcngp.44
    ..
    "It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
    accepting it"
    ~Aristotle.
    ..
    "BD [MCNGP]" <BD@CertGuard> wrote in message
    news:%...
    >>>Did you see what Inoffensive ()

    > graced us with in ?<<
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> I've passed 70-270/70-290/70-291/70-293. Next up are
    >> 70-294/70-297/70-089 and I'd have MCSE 2003.
    >>
    >> I'd also like to have MCSE Security. I'd take 70-298/70-299/70-350 in
    >> addition. On a resume, would I mention MCSE 2003 and MCSE 2003
    >> Security separately or just include MCSE 2003 Security?
    >>
    >> Thanks.
    >>

    > Just an opinion here, but I would see having MCSE2003 and
    > MCSE2003+Security as
    > being redundant. Redundancy is inefficient, Inefficiency is Lame, Lameness
    > is
    > Stupid, and Stupidity is not what people are looking to hire.
    >
    > --
    > BD
    > MCNGP #51
    > -- MCNGP.com - You know IT!?
    > -- www.CertGuard.com; www.SWPPM.com
    >
    >
     
    The Rev [MCT], Aug 8, 2006
    #3
  4. "The Rev [MCT]" <> wrote in message
    news:u%...
    > I'd also add - Don't take 297. Use 298 instead that way you wont have to
    > take 2 design exams.
    >


    Rev,

    Can you explain for me what you mean? Does taking 298 instead of 297 reduce
    the # of exams needed?

    Thanks,

    Jonathan
     
    Jonathan Roberts, Aug 8, 2006
    #4
  5. "Jonathan Roberts" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    > "The Rev [MCT]" <> wrote in message
    > news:u%...
    > > I'd also add - Don't take 297. Use 298 instead that way you wont have to
    > > take 2 design exams.
    > >

    >
    > Rev,
    >
    > Can you explain for me what you mean? Does taking 298 instead of 297

    reduce
    > the # of exams needed?


    Never mind... I see. This is specific to +Security.
     
    Jonathan Roberts, Aug 8, 2006
    #5
  6. Yes 298 is for the Security Designator, but it counts as your normal design
    exam as well, so you don't have to take 297 and 298. You can just take 298.

    --
    ..rev - mct.mcngp.44
    ..
    "It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
    accepting it"
    ~Aristotle.
    ..
    "Jonathan Roberts" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    > "Jonathan Roberts" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    >>
    >> "The Rev [MCT]" <> wrote in message
    >> news:u%...
    >> > I'd also add - Don't take 297. Use 298 instead that way you wont have
    >> > to
    >> > take 2 design exams.
    >> >

    >>
    >> Rev,
    >>
    >> Can you explain for me what you mean? Does taking 298 instead of 297

    > reduce
    >> the # of exams needed?

    >
    > Never mind... I see. This is specific to +Security.
    >
    >
     
    The Rev [MCT], Aug 8, 2006
    #6
  7. Thank you for clarifying

    "The Rev [MCT]" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Yes 298 is for the Security Designator, but it counts as your normal

    design
    > exam as well, so you don't have to take 297 and 298. You can just take

    298.
    >
    > --
    > .rev - mct.mcngp.44
    > .
    > "It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought

    without
    > accepting it"
    > ~Aristotle.
    > .
    > "Jonathan Roberts" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > >
    > > "Jonathan Roberts" <> wrote in message
    > > news:...
    > >>
    > >> "The Rev [MCT]" <> wrote in message
    > >> news:u%...
    > >> > I'd also add - Don't take 297. Use 298 instead that way you wont have
    > >> > to
    > >> > take 2 design exams.
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >> Rev,
    > >>
    > >> Can you explain for me what you mean? Does taking 298 instead of 297

    > > reduce
    > >> the # of exams needed?

    > >
    > > Never mind... I see. This is specific to +Security.
    > >
    > >

    >
     
    Jonathan Roberts, Aug 8, 2006
    #7
  8. just wondering. do i receive every certificate for every mcp i pass. also
    how many questions were there for the exam 70-291?

    "Inoffensive" wrote:

    > Hi,
    >
    > I've passed 70-270/70-290/70-291/70-293. Next up are 70-294/70-297/70-089
    > and I'd have MCSE 2003.
    >
    > I'd also like to have MCSE Security. I'd take 70-298/70-299/70-350 in
    > addition. On a resume, would I mention MCSE 2003 and MCSE 2003 Security
    > separately or just include MCSE 2003 Security?
    >
    > Thanks.
     
    =?Utf-8?B?bWFu?=, Aug 8, 2006
    #8
  9. I received a printout of the test score along with a summary of how I did in
    each sections. I believe there were 40 questions.

    Good luck!

    "man" wrote:

    > just wondering. do i receive every certificate for every mcp i pass. also
    > how many questions were there for the exam 70-291?
    >
    > "Inoffensive" wrote:
    >
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > I've passed 70-270/70-290/70-291/70-293. Next up are 70-294/70-297/70-089
    > > and I'd have MCSE 2003.
    > >
    > > I'd also like to have MCSE Security. I'd take 70-298/70-299/70-350 in
    > > addition. On a resume, would I mention MCSE 2003 and MCSE 2003 Security
    > > separately or just include MCSE 2003 Security?
    > >
    > > Thanks.
     
    =?Utf-8?B?SW5vZmZlbnNpdmU=?=, Aug 8, 2006
    #9
  10. =?Utf-8?B?SW5vZmZlbnNpdmU=?=

    BD [MCNGP] Guest

    >>Did you see what man () graced us with
    in ?<<
    > just wondering. do i receive every certificate for every mcp i pass.
    > also how many questions were there for the exam 70-291?
    >

    Fu┬ęking tool.
    --
    BD
    MCNGP #51
    -- MCNGP.com - You know IT!?
    -- www.CertGuard.com; www.SWPPM.com
     
    BD [MCNGP], Aug 8, 2006
    #10
  11. "man" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > just wondering. do i receive every certificate for every mcp i pass. also
    > how many questions were there for the exam 70-291?


    I think there are 474 questions
     
    Jonathan Roberts, Aug 9, 2006
    #11
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Nico
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    580
    Gio Sim
    Aug 25, 2003
  2. Replies:
    3
    Views:
    586
    ADRENALINE
    Feb 17, 2004
  3. Ben
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    483
  4. Ryan Webb
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    500
  5. ffoeg
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    742
    ffoeg
    Jun 29, 2006
Loading...

Share This Page