Maxxum 7D brochure - detailed

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Alan Browne, Dec 23, 2004.

  1. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    For whomever may be interested, a detailed description of the 7D is available
    (24 page pdf, 3 MB) at:

    http://www2.konicaminolta.de/foto/7d/dynax7d_guidebook.pdf

    Yes, it is a marketing doc, of course, but it also has a pretty complete system
    and accessories guide.

    Cheers,
    Alan
    --
    -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
    -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
    -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
    -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
    Alan Browne, Dec 23, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Thanx for the link. It's going to be a great help to me.

    Unfortunately, I just realized that this camera, for the body alone, is
    going for about $1,500 - $1,600 :eek:(

    - manzoor
    Manzoorul Hassan, Dec 23, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Alan Browne

    steven Guest

    "Manzoorul Hassan" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Thanx for the link. It's going to be a great help to me.
    >
    > Unfortunately, I just realized that this camera, for the body alone, is
    > going for about $1,500 - $1,600 :eek:(
    >


    In Europe it's even worse: in October I got a quote of 1661 euro.
    Prices seem to have dropped already, though this may just be Christmas
    offers. I ordered it this week for 1300 euro.

    Steven
    steven, Dec 23, 2004
    #3
  4. Alan Browne

    Bill Tuthill Guest

    Manzoorul Hassan <> wrote:
    >
    > Unfortunately, I just realized that this camera, for the body alone,
    > is going for about $1,500 - $1,600 :eek:(


    Yes, and for some reason I'm not very excited about the camera itself.
    Antishake seems somewhat useful, but I've been doing photography for
    many years, and have always managed to find enough light, and most of
    my subjects move anyway, so antishake won't help.

    The camera is awfully large and doesn't take standard AA batteries
    (except with vertical grip, which makes it even larger).

    Worst of all, it's partial frame, making my 24-50/4 a 36-75/4 lens.
    I could spend twice as much and get a full-frame Kodak DCS.
    Bill Tuthill, Dec 23, 2004
    #4
  5. Alan Browne

    Ryadia Guest

    "steven" <> wrote in message
    news:ZTDyd.8403$-ops.be...
    >
    > "Manzoorul Hassan" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > Thanx for the link. It's going to be a great help to me.
    > >
    > > Unfortunately, I just realized that this camera, for the body alone, is
    > > going for about $1,500 - $1,600 :eek:(
    > >

    >
    > In Europe it's even worse: in October I got a quote of 1661 euro.
    > Prices seem to have dropped already, though this may just be Christmas
    > offers. I ordered it this week for 1300 euro.
    >
    > Steven
    >

    Have you compared this camera to other offerings from other makers? Not the
    price but the performance, I mean.

    Doug
    Ryadia, Dec 23, 2004
    #5
  6. Alan Browne

    steven Guest

    "Ryadia" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    > "steven" <> wrote in message
    > news:ZTDyd.8403$-ops.be...
    > >
    > > "Manzoorul Hassan" <> wrote in message
    > > news:...
    > > > Thanx for the link. It's going to be a great help to me.
    > > >
    > > > Unfortunately, I just realized that this camera, for the body alone,

    is
    > > > going for about $1,500 - $1,600 :eek:(
    > > >

    > >
    > > In Europe it's even worse: in October I got a quote of 1661 euro.
    > > Prices seem to have dropped already, though this may just be Christmas
    > > offers. I ordered it this week for 1300 euro.
    > >
    > > Steven
    > >

    > Have you compared this camera to other offerings from other makers? Not

    the
    > price but the performance, I mean.
    >


    Well, I knew K-M would let us pay through the nose for this anti-shake
    feature, but I find it difficult to place an exact value on that.
    Most important for me is that I already have lots of Minolta glass for my
    si800's.
    steven, Dec 23, 2004
    #6
  7. I am doing just that. At this time looking at the following:

    * Nikon D70
    * Canon Digital Rebel (EOS 300)
    * Minolta Maxxum 7D

    The Digital Rebel seems to be best bang-for-buck. Any other that I
    shoul dbe looking at?

    - manzoor
    Manzoorul Hassan, Dec 23, 2004
    #7
  8. Alan Browne

    leo Guest

    Manzoorul Hassan wrote:
    > I am doing just that. At this time looking at the following:
    >
    > * Nikon D70
    > * Canon Digital Rebel (EOS 300)
    > * Minolta Maxxum 7D
    >
    > The Digital Rebel seems to be best bang-for-buck. Any other that I
    > shoul dbe looking at?
    >
    > - manzoor



    At $630, body after rebate, DRebel is the best deal. If you're new to
    DSLR, you can't beat it. Get it, learn with it and then upgrade later.
    leo, Dec 23, 2004
    #8
  9. Yes, the Digital Rebel does seem to be the best deal. Unfortunately, I
    will also need to buy some lense and flash. With the Minolta I was
    hoping to not need to do so.

    - manzoor
    Manzoorul Hassan, Dec 24, 2004
    #9
  10. Alan Browne

    Bill Tuthill Guest

    leo <> wrote:
    > Manzoorul Hassan wrote:
    >> I am doing just that. At this time looking at the following:
    >>
    >> * Nikon D70
    >> * Canon Digital Rebel (300D)
    >> * Minolta Maxxum 7D
    >>
    >> The Digital Rebel seems to be best bang-for-buck. Any other that I
    >> should be looking at?
    >>

    > At $630, body after rebate, DRebel is the best deal. If you're new to
    > DSLR, you can't beat it. Get it, learn with it and then upgrade later.


    Especially if you apply the Russian firmware hack, then you get MLU
    and other features of the 10D.

    However to me the Pentax *ist-Ds is more attractive because it takes
    standard AA batteries, and you can choose one of several lenses
    that are better than the Canon 18-55/3.5-5.6 EFS kit lens. I mean
    the Pentax 16-45/4 DA, the Pentax 24-90/3.5-4.5 (also works with film)
    or the Sigma 18-125/3.5-5.6 DC (betting that the partial-frame DSLR fad
    will end before your Sigma breaks, as they often do).

    I don't really need a DSLR yet, because I found a lab that can make
    3000x2000 scans of film for $7 a roll, and I have several good film
    cameras, but so far the Pentax is the only DSLR I can imagine buying.
    And I have three excellent Minolta lenses, and one good one.
    Bill Tuthill, Dec 24, 2004
    #10
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. elie
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    947
  2. elie
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    873
  3. elie
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    927
  4. elie
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    940
  5. elie
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    769
    shelleyleena
    Nov 27, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page