Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Peter H, Nov 19, 2003.

  1. Peter H

    Peter H Guest

    Greetings.... Apologies if this posts twice, first try went down a black
    'ole....

    I bought a Fuji S3000 at the weekend, on the strength of an advert claiming
    it has 3.2 m/pixel, interpolated to 6 m/pixel output. I'm damned if I can
    find any reference to interpolated output in the manual, or on Fuji's site:

    Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji kit in
    general?

    Pete
     
    Peter H, Nov 19, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Peter H

    Harry Da Hat Guest

    On 19-Nov-2003, "Peter H" <> wrote:

    > I bought a Fuji S3000 at the weekend, on the strength of an advert
    > claiming
    > it has 3.2 m/pixel, interpolated to 6 m/pixel output


    It is interpolated. I"ve been using a 4900 for years, which really has a
    2.2mp sensor, when it's output is interpolated to 4.4mp. Apparently, all
    the Fuji's are like that. Ask on one of the Fuji mailing lists.

    Harry


    --

    Fuji Cameras Make The Best Pets!!!!!!!!!!

    mailto:
     
    Harry Da Hat, Nov 19, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Peter H

    KS Guest

    Peter H wrote:
    > Greetings.... Apologies if this posts twice, first try went down a
    > black 'ole....
    >
    > I bought a Fuji S3000 at the weekend, on the strength of an advert
    > claiming it has 3.2 m/pixel, interpolated to 6 m/pixel output. I'm
    > damned if I can find any reference to interpolated output in the
    > manual, or on Fuji's site:
    >
    > Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji
    > kit in general?
    >
    > Pete


    As I understand it, the S3000 only does 3.2MP, it's the S5000 the does 3.2MP
    interpolated to 6 MP. The S3000 comes in silver, the S5000 in black.

    But then, I could be wrong ! Hope this helps.
     
    KS, Nov 19, 2003
    #3
  4. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:10:25 -0000, "Peter H" <>
    wrote:

    > Greetings.... Apologies if this posts twice, first try went down a black
    > 'ole....
    >
    > I bought a Fuji S3000 at the weekend, on the strength of an advert claiming
    > it has 3.2 m/pixel, interpolated to 6 m/pixel output. I'm damned if I can
    > find any reference to interpolated output in the manual, or on Fuji's site:
    >
    > Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji kit in
    > general?


    You have been misled.
     
    I used to be sober but now I am, Nov 20, 2003
    #4
  5. Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "Peter H" <> wrote in message
    news:C0Rub.10549$9.net...
    > Greetings.... Apologies if this posts twice, first try went down a black
    > 'ole....
    >
    > I bought a Fuji S3000 at the weekend, on the strength of an advert

    claiming
    > it has 3.2 m/pixel, interpolated to 6 m/pixel output. I'm damned if I can
    > find any reference to interpolated output in the manual, or on Fuji's

    site:
    >
    > Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji kit

    in
    > general?
    >
    > Pete


    All Bayer camera's interpolate. In 6MP mode your Fuji interpolates to twice
    the degree.

    Here are the facts. Note, this is quite kind to the Bayer cameras since in
    reality only 75% of the total sensor count can be used to create full color
    since 25% of the total sensors are green orphans, as you'll see below.
    Divide the S2 Pro's sensor count in half to get the S3000's numbers. Cost
    per sensor is the most important and interesting section....

    Optical information captured - 14n is the benchmark = 100%:
    --------------------
    14n - 100%
    1Ds - 81%
    SD9 - 75%
    10D - 46%
    S2 - 45%
    D100 - 44%

    Sensor color breakdown - R, G, B (R%, G%, B%), 14n is the benchmark = 100%:
    --------------------
    14n - 3.43, 6.85, 3.43 (100, 100, 100)
    1Ds - 2.78, 5.55, 2.78 (81, 81, 81)
    SD9 - 3.43, 3.43, 3.43 (100, 50, 100)
    10D - 1.58, 3.15, 1.58 (46, 46, 46)
    S2 - 1.52, 3.05, 1.52 (45, 45, 45)
    D100 - 1.50, 3.00, 1.50 (44, 44, 44)

    Degree of color interpolation present in output files - SD9 is the benchmark
    = 100%:
    --------------------
    SD9 (3.4 MP) - 100% optical color data per output pixel (= no interpolation)
    14n (13.7 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    1Ds (11.1 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    10D (6.3 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    S2 (6.1 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    D100 (6.0 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    SD9 (13.7 MP) - 25% optical color data per output pixel
    S2 (12.2 MP) - 17% optical color data per output pixel

    Cost in cents per sensor - 1DS = benchmark, source: pricegrabber.com:
    --------------------
    1Ds - .060 (100%)
    14n - .030 (50%)
    S2 - .025 (42%)
    D100 - .024 (40%)
    10D - .022 (36%)
    SD9 - .008 (13%)

    Body cost - 1DS = benchmark. Source: pricegrabber.com:
    --------------------
    1Ds - $6350 (100%)
    14n - $4145 (65%)
    S2 - $1549 (24%)
    D100 - $1429 (23%)
    10D - $1359 (21%)
    SD9 - $899 (14%)
     
    George Preddy, Nov 20, 2003
    #5
  6. On the old 3800, there are 2 3mp settings (3F and 3N). According to
    the manual, the number of pixels being stored is the same ( 2048 x 1536)
    for either setting, but the output image data size is 1300KB for 3F and
    590KB for 3N. Nothing is said about interpolated pixels though!

    Moxieman

    KS wrote:

    >Peter H wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Greetings.... Apologies if this posts twice, first try went down a
    >>black 'ole....
    >>
    >>I bought a Fuji S3000 at the weekend, on the strength of an advert
    >>claiming it has 3.2 m/pixel, interpolated to 6 m/pixel output. I'm
    >>damned if I can find any reference to interpolated output in the
    >>manual, or on Fuji's site:
    >>
    >>Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji
    >>kit in general?
    >>
    >>Pete
    >>
    >>

    >
    >As I understand it, the S3000 only does 3.2MP, it's the S5000 the does 3.2MP
    >interpolated to 6 MP. The S3000 comes in silver, the S5000 in black.
    >
    >But then, I could be wrong ! Hope this helps.
    >
    >
    >
    >
     
    Antonio L. Balsamo Sr., Nov 20, 2003
    #6
  7. Peter H

    Bill M Guest

    Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:41:47 +0900, "George Preddy"
    <> wrote:

    >"Peter H" <> wrote in message
    >news:C0Rub.10549$9.net...
    >> Greetings.... Apologies if this posts twice, first try went down a black
    >> 'ole....
    >>
    >> I bought a Fuji S3000 at the weekend, on the strength of an advert

    >claiming
    >> it has 3.2 m/pixel, interpolated to 6 m/pixel output. I'm damned if I can
    >> find any reference to interpolated output in the manual, or on Fuji's

    >site:
    >>
    >> Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji kit

    >in
    >> general?
    >>
    >> Pete

    >
    >All Bayer camera's interpolate. In 6MP mode your Fuji interpolates to twice
    >the degree.
    >
    >Here are the facts. Note, this is quite kind to the Bayer cameras since in
    >reality only 75% of the total sensor count can be used to create full color
    >since 25% of the total sensors are green orphans, as you'll see below.
    >Divide the S2 Pro's sensor count in half to get the S3000's numbers. Cost
    >per sensor is the most important and interesting section....
    >

    <snip snip>

    Still babbling about 25% green orphans I see...again prove it...
     
    Bill M, Nov 20, 2003
    #7
  8. Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "Bill M" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:41:47 +0900, "George Preddy"
    > >Here are the facts. Note, this is quite kind to the Bayer cameras since

    in
    > >reality only 75% of the total sensor count can be used to create full

    color
    > >since 25% of the total sensors are green orphans, as you'll see below.
    > >Divide the S2 Pro's sensor count in half to get the S3000's numbers.

    Cost
    > >per sensor is the most important and interesting section....
    > >

    > <snip snip>
    >
    > Still babbling about 25% green orphans I see...again prove it...


    unsnip unsnip
     
    George Preddy, Nov 20, 2003
    #8
  9. Peter H

    Bill M Guest

    Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:13:46 +0900, "George Preddy"
    <> wrote:

    >
    >"Bill M" <> wrote in message
    >news:...
    >> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:41:47 +0900, "George Preddy"
    >> >Here are the facts. Note, this is quite kind to the Bayer cameras since

    >in
    >> >reality only 75% of the total sensor count can be used to create full

    >color
    >> >since 25% of the total sensors are green orphans, as you'll see below.
    >> >Divide the S2 Pro's sensor count in half to get the S3000's numbers.

    >Cost
    >> >per sensor is the most important and interesting section....
    >> >

    >> <snip snip>
    >>
    >> Still babbling about 25% green orphans I see...again prove it...

    >
    >unsnip unsnip
    >

    Your figures George...post ANYTHING reputable backing them up! I can't
    find any mention in any discussion of bayer sensors anywhere that back
    you up....
     
    Bill M, Nov 20, 2003
    #9
  10. Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "Bill M" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:13:46 +0900, "George Preddy"
    > <> wrote:
    > >> Still babbling about 25% green orphans I see...again prove it...

    > >
    > >unsnip unsnip
    > >

    > Your figures George...post ANYTHING reputable backing them up! I can't
    > find any mention in any discussion of bayer sensors anywhere that back
    > you up....


    Check em anywhere, they're right. If not, please let me know which one is
    wrong.
     
    George Preddy, Nov 20, 2003
    #10
  11. Peter H

    Bill M Guest

    Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:21:35 +0900, "George Preddy"
    <> wrote:

    >
    >"Bill M" <> wrote in message
    >news:...
    >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:13:46 +0900, "George Preddy"
    >> <> wrote:
    >> >> Still babbling about 25% green orphans I see...again prove it...
    >> >
    >> >unsnip unsnip
    >> >

    >> Your figures George...post ANYTHING reputable backing them up! I can't
    >> find any mention in any discussion of bayer sensors anywhere that back
    >> you up....

    >
    >Check em anywhere, they're right. If not, please let me know which one is
    >wrong.
    >

    You replied as expected...coward...it's up to you to prove the 25%
    orphan greens, YOU made the statement. Your chart means nothing as I
    don't consider you a reputable source. As I said, I can't locate
    ANYTHING ANYWHERE backing your assesment of the orphans...try reading
    what I wrote!
     
    Bill M, Nov 20, 2003
    #11
  12. Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "Bill M" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:21:35 +0900, "George Preddy"
    > <> wrote:


    > >Check em anywhere, they're right. If not, please let me know which one

    is
    > >wrong.
    > >

    > You replied as expected...coward...it's up to you to prove the 25%
    > orphan greens, YOU made the statement. Your chart means nothing as I
    > don't consider you a reputable source. As I said, I can't locate
    > ANYTHING ANYWHERE backing your assesment of the orphans...try reading
    > what I wrote!


    Find any explanation of Bayer's RGB breakout anywhere, it'll agree with my
    numbers to the tee.
     
    George Preddy, Nov 21, 2003
    #12
  13. Peter H

    Guest Guest

    Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    There are no orphaned sensors. You are a TROLL, and 25% likely to be a
    danger to those around you.

    Please tell me you haven't sired any offspring, or at least if you have,
    that their mother(s) live far away and deny you access.



    >
    > Find any explanation of Bayer's RGB breakout anywhere, it'll agree with my
    > numbers to the tee.
    >
    >
     
    Guest, Nov 21, 2003
    #13
  14. Peter H

    Bill M Guest

    Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:57:53 +0900, "George Preddy"
    <> wrote:

    >
    >"Bill M" <> wrote in message
    >news:...
    >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:21:35 +0900, "George Preddy"
    >> <> wrote:

    >
    >> >Check em anywhere, they're right. If not, please let me know which one

    >is
    >> >wrong.
    >> >

    >> You replied as expected...coward...it's up to you to prove the 25%
    >> orphan greens, YOU made the statement. Your chart means nothing as I
    >> don't consider you a reputable source. As I said, I can't locate
    >> ANYTHING ANYWHERE backing your assesment of the orphans...try reading
    >> what I wrote!

    >
    >Find any explanation of Bayer's RGB breakout anywhere, it'll agree with my
    >numbers to the tee.
    >


    I've read em...no mention of 25% orhaned green sensors, so therefore
    you are:

    a) full of shit as usual
    b) stupid
    c) a liar
    d) a coward
    e) a troll
    f) live in a fantasy world
    g) all the above

    I'm going with g
     
    Bill M, Nov 21, 2003
    #14
  15. Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "George Preddy" <> wrote in message
    news:bpiaaq$q0u$...
    > "Peter H" <> wrote in message
    > news:C0Rub.10549$9.net...


    What a great, informative post this was...

    > > Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji kit

    > in
    > > general?
    > >
    > > Pete

    >
    > All Bayer camera's interpolate. In 6MP mode your Fuji interpolates to

    twice
    > the degree.
    >
    > Here are the facts. Note, this is quite kind to the Bayer cameras since

    in
    > reality only 75% of the total sensor count can be used to create full

    color
    > since 25% of the total sensors are green orphans, as you'll see below.
    > Divide the S2 Pro's sensor count in half to get the S3000's numbers. Cost
    > per sensor is the most important and interesting section....
    >
    > Optical information captured - 14n is the benchmark = 100%:
    > --------------------
    > 14n - 100%
    > 1Ds - 81%
    > SD9 - 75%
    > 10D - 46%
    > S2 - 45%
    > D100 - 44%
    >
    > Sensor color breakdown - R, G, B (R%, G%, B%), 14n is the benchmark =

    100%:
    > --------------------
    > 14n - 3.43, 6.85, 3.43 (100, 100, 100)
    > 1Ds - 2.78, 5.55, 2.78 (81, 81, 81)
    > SD9 - 3.43, 3.43, 3.43 (100, 50, 100)
    > 10D - 1.58, 3.15, 1.58 (46, 46, 46)
    > S2 - 1.52, 3.05, 1.52 (45, 45, 45)
    > D100 - 1.50, 3.00, 1.50 (44, 44, 44)
    >
    > Degree of color interpolation present in output files - SD9 is the

    benchmark
    > = 100%:
    > --------------------
    > SD9 (3.4 MP) - 100% optical color data per output pixel (= no

    interpolation)
    > 14n (13.7 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > 1Ds (11.1 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > 10D (6.3 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > S2 (6.1 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > D100 (6.0 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > SD9 (13.7 MP) - 25% optical color data per output pixel
    > S2 (12.2 MP) - 17% optical color data per output pixel
    >
    > Cost in cents per sensor - 1DS = benchmark, source: pricegrabber.com:
    > --------------------
    > 1Ds - .060 (100%)
    > 14n - .030 (50%)
    > S2 - .025 (42%)
    > D100 - .024 (40%)
    > 10D - .022 (36%)
    > SD9 - .008 (13%)
    >
    > Body cost - 1DS = benchmark. Source: pricegrabber.com:
    > --------------------
    > 1Ds - $6350 (100%)
    > 14n - $4145 (65%)
    > S2 - $1549 (24%)
    > D100 - $1429 (23%)
    > 10D - $1359 (21%)
    > SD9 - $899 (14%)
     
    George Preddy, Nov 21, 2003
    #15
  16. Peter H

    Guest Guest

    Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    George is a troll. He doesn't understand sensor technology. Ignore
    everything he says.
    Go to a reputable review site instead.

    "George Preddy" <> wrote in message
    news:bpl50h$bro$...
    >
    > "George Preddy" <> wrote in message
    > news:bpiaaq$q0u$...
    > > "Peter H" <> wrote in message
    > > news:C0Rub.10549$9.net...

    >
    > What a great, informative post this was...
    >
    > > > Can anyone tell me if I've been misled, or is this a feature of Fuji

    kit
    > > in
    > > > general?
    > > >
    > > > Pete

    > >
    > > All Bayer camera's interpolate. In 6MP mode your Fuji interpolates to

    > twice
    > > the degree.
    > >
    > > Here are the facts. Note, this is quite kind to the Bayer cameras since

    > in
    > > reality only 75% of the total sensor count can be used to create full

    > color
    > > since 25% of the total sensors are green orphans, as you'll see below.
    > > Divide the S2 Pro's sensor count in half to get the S3000's numbers.

    Cost
    > > per sensor is the most important and interesting section....
    > >
    > > Optical information captured - 14n is the benchmark = 100%:
    > > --------------------
    > > 14n - 100%
    > > 1Ds - 81%
    > > SD9 - 75%
    > > 10D - 46%
    > > S2 - 45%
    > > D100 - 44%
    > >
    > > Sensor color breakdown - R, G, B (R%, G%, B%), 14n is the benchmark =

    > 100%:
    > > --------------------
    > > 14n - 3.43, 6.85, 3.43 (100, 100, 100)
    > > 1Ds - 2.78, 5.55, 2.78 (81, 81, 81)
    > > SD9 - 3.43, 3.43, 3.43 (100, 50, 100)
    > > 10D - 1.58, 3.15, 1.58 (46, 46, 46)
    > > S2 - 1.52, 3.05, 1.52 (45, 45, 45)
    > > D100 - 1.50, 3.00, 1.50 (44, 44, 44)
    > >
    > > Degree of color interpolation present in output files - SD9 is the

    > benchmark
    > > = 100%:
    > > --------------------
    > > SD9 (3.4 MP) - 100% optical color data per output pixel (= no

    > interpolation)
    > > 14n (13.7 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > > 1Ds (11.1 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > > 10D (6.3 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > > S2 (6.1 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > > D100 (6.0 MP) - 33% optical color data per output pixel
    > > SD9 (13.7 MP) - 25% optical color data per output pixel
    > > S2 (12.2 MP) - 17% optical color data per output pixel
    > >
    > > Cost in cents per sensor - 1DS = benchmark, source: pricegrabber.com:
    > > --------------------
    > > 1Ds - .060 (100%)
    > > 14n - .030 (50%)
    > > S2 - .025 (42%)
    > > D100 - .024 (40%)
    > > 10D - .022 (36%)
    > > SD9 - .008 (13%)
    > >
    > > Body cost - 1DS = benchmark. Source: pricegrabber.com:
    > > --------------------
    > > 1Ds - $6350 (100%)
    > > 14n - $4145 (65%)
    > > S2 - $1549 (24%)
    > > D100 - $1429 (23%)
    > > 10D - $1359 (21%)
    > > SD9 - $899 (14%)

    >
    >
    >
     
    Guest, Nov 21, 2003
    #16
  17. Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "Bill M" <> wrote in message
    news:eek:...
    > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:57:53 +0900, "George Preddy"
    > <> wrote:
    > >> You replied as expected...coward...it's up to you to prove the 25%
    > >> orphan greens, YOU made the statement. Your chart means nothing as I
    > >> don't consider you a reputable source. As I said, I can't locate
    > >> ANYTHING ANYWHERE backing your assesment of the orphans...try reading
    > >> what I wrote!

    > >
    > >Find any explanation of Bayer's RGB breakout anywhere, it'll agree with

    my
    > >numbers to the tee.
    > >

    >
    > I've read em...no mention of 25% orhaned green sensors, so therefore
    > you are:


    Then your source is wrong. Bayers use 25% red, 50% green, 25% blue sensors.
    Only 75% of the total sensor count has complimentary matches. Out of
    curiousity, what source are you using that says Bayers are 33/33/33% RGB?
     
    George Preddy, Nov 21, 2003
    #17
  18. Peter H

    Bill M Guest

    Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:50:02 +0900, "George Preddy"
    <> wrote:

    >
    >"Bill M" <> wrote in message
    >news:eek:...
    >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:57:53 +0900, "George Preddy"
    >> <> wrote:
    >> >> You replied as expected...coward...it's up to you to prove the 25%
    >> >> orphan greens, YOU made the statement. Your chart means nothing as I
    >> >> don't consider you a reputable source. As I said, I can't locate
    >> >> ANYTHING ANYWHERE backing your assesment of the orphans...try reading
    >> >> what I wrote!
    >> >
    >> >Find any explanation of Bayer's RGB breakout anywhere, it'll agree with

    >my
    >> >numbers to the tee.
    >> >

    >>
    >> I've read em...no mention of 25% orhaned green sensors, so therefore
    >> you are:

    >
    >Then your source is wrong. Bayers use 25% red, 50% green, 25% blue sensors.
    >Only 75% of the total sensor count has complimentary matches. Out of
    >curiousity, what source are you using that says Bayers are 33/33/33% RGB?
    >

    I'm not claiming 33%, can you read? Bayer does not have 25% orphaned
    greens...which is your still unproven statement...
     
    Bill M, Nov 21, 2003
    #18
  19. Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "Bill M" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:50:02 +0900, "George Preddy"
    > <> wrote:


    > >> I've read em...no mention of 25% orhaned green sensors, so therefore
    > >> you are:

    > >
    > >Then your source is wrong. Bayers use 25% red, 50% green, 25% blue

    sensors.
    > >Only 75% of the total sensor count has complimentary matches. Out of
    > >curiousity, what source are you using that says Bayers are 33/33/33% RGB?
    > >

    > I'm not claiming 33%, can you read? Bayer does not have 25% orphaned
    > greens...which is your still unproven statement...


    How many complete RGB sets are there on a 6M sensor Bayer, in only your
    world?
     
    George Preddy, Nov 22, 2003
    #19
  20. Re: Interpolation rundown (Re: Is Fuji S3000 3.2m/pixel output, or 6 m/pixel interpolated output?)

    "George Preddy" <> wrote in message
    news:bpmhsa$455$...
    >
    > "Bill M" <> wrote in message
    > news:...

    SNIP
    > > I'm not claiming 33%, can you read? Bayer does not have 25% orphaned
    > > greens...which is your still unproven statement...

    >
    > How many complete RGB sets are there on a 6M sensor Bayer, in only your
    > world?


    Stil zero, but apparently you're not paying attention as it has been
    explained to you before.

    Bart
     
    Bart van der Wolf, Nov 22, 2003
    #20
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Ed
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    425
    SimonG Ltd.
    Jul 27, 2003
  2. Aleksandar

    Fuji finepix S3000

    Aleksandar, Nov 8, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    464
  3. Antonio L. Balsamo Sr.

    Fuji 3800 vs. s3000 What's the diff?

    Antonio L. Balsamo Sr., Nov 16, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    363
    Ralph
    Nov 17, 2003
  4. Peter H

    Fuji S3000 - 3.2 m/pixel or 6 m/pixel?

    Peter H, Nov 18, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    697
  5. Phöènix
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    1,798
    Michael J Davis
    Dec 19, 2003
Loading...

Share This Page