Interesting Blue-Ray developments

Discussion in 'DVD Video' started by poldy, Jun 23, 2004.

  1. poldy

    poldy Guest

    From a posting at ArsTechnica:

    That is a terrific writeup.

    If the reporting is accurate and some of the bold claims prove to be
    true, it's hard to see BR being derailed.

    - BR discs will cost only 10% more than DVD initially and eventually
    cost less? Is that single or dual layer? With or without cartridge?
    With or without the TDK hard coating?

    - Single-layer, 25 GB, gives you 135 minutes of HD video, 3 languages
    and 2 hours of bonus materials in SD.

    - Dual-layer, 50 GB, gives 3 hours of HD video, DTS and 2 hours of HD
    bonus materials.

    - Resoultion would be 1920x1024? What frame rate?

    - MPEG2 is almost a given. Also considering MPEG4 AVC FRExt and VC-9.
    Studios think they can get 2-3 times the compression with MPEG4 over

    - TDK protective coating demo - sharpie pen ink beads up, wiped away
    with cloth.

    - Outputs being considered include component, DVI (presumably HDMI too)
    and 1393 Firewire 5C.

    - Sony has 1500 titles ready to go for HD? Is that only
    Columbia-Tristar titles? What happens if Sony acquires MGM-UA?

    The reporting suggests BR is way more on the ball than HD-DVD.
    Supposedly studios are lining up behind BR "privately if not publicly."
    If the disc production cost estimates are true, there would be no reason
    why they wouldn't.

    The main outstanding issue is hardware cost. Will they only release
    recorder units? How fast can they get the costs down towards consumer
    acceptance? It sounds like they made a lot of progress on disc costs
    (or we've overestimated BR disc costs). So it's not inconceivable they
    could get hardware costs down.

    For codecs, the interesting question is whether it would be cheaper to
    just press dual layer discs (if it's true you can get 3 hours of HD
    video with DTS and 2 hours of HD video of bonus materials with just
    MPEG2) or pay to license the other codecs. Besides licensing costs,
    they'd probably have to pay for more powerful decoder chips, affecting
    hardware costs.

    And for Sony, there's a strategic issue with codecs. If they refuse
    VC-9 put BR on the PS3, MS would almost be forced to use HD-DVD. If
    Sony is confident about BR, they could "lock out" MS from BR. Of
    course, MS would likely not support BR in Windows then, in which case BR
    Consortium members Dell and HP would have to build in BR support
    independently of MS. However, Sony is not the BR Consortium so other
    members and the studios would surely have a large say in resolving the
    codec question.
    poldy, Jun 23, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Replies:
  2. thingy

    Interesting developments in VM land

    thingy, Apr 3, 2006, in forum: NZ Computing
  3. Blig Merk
    Apr 27, 2008
  4. Bucky Breeder

    Recent Developments on HDD

    Bucky Breeder, Jun 6, 2009, in forum: Computer Support
    Jun 8, 2009
  5. Bruce

    Full frame DSLR developments

    Bruce, Oct 14, 2011, in forum: Digital Photography
    Oct 15, 2011