Intel Celeron 2,6 Ghz

Discussion in 'Computer Support' started by Maurice, Jun 12, 2005.

  1. Maurice

    Maurice Guest

    Is it worth to buy a Intel Celeron 2,6 Ghz? Are there people with
    experience? Or is it not worth it? this one has 256 kb cache instead of 128
    Kb.

    Kind regrads,

    Maurice
     
    Maurice, Jun 12, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Maurice

    Toolman Tim Guest

    "Maurice" <nietvantoepassing.com> wrote in message
    news:ebd30$42ac7523$50396d52$...
    > Is it worth to buy a Intel Celeron 2,6 Ghz? Are there people with
    > experience? Or is it not worth it? this one has 256 kb cache instead of
    > 128 Kb.
    >


    That would depend on what you want to *do* with it. If you are doing basic
    office work (Word, Excel, etc.) it should be fine. If you do 3D CAD, video
    editing, FPS games, etc., you'd better look for something with more
    horsepower.

    Most of the workstations at work are 2.4G Celerons. A few of us who
    seriously multitask have P4s with much more zing to them (oh - more memory,
    all that <g>)
     
    Toolman Tim, Jun 12, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Maurice wrote:

    > Is it worth to buy a Intel Celeron 2,6 Ghz? Are there people with
    > experience? Or is it not worth it? this one has 256 kb cache instead of 128
    > Kb.


    For $10, yes. For $100,000, no. Can you narrow it down a little?

    --
    Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
    Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
    Info: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
    *ALSO contains links for access to the NON-BETA GG archive interface*
     
    Blinky the Shark, Jun 13, 2005
    #3
  4. Maurice

    Maurice Guest

    It is a Celeron D processor, which are better then the regular celeron. It
    cost 100 Euro.

    "Blinky the Shark" <> schreef in bericht
    news:...
    > Maurice wrote:
    >
    >> Is it worth to buy a Intel Celeron 2,6 Ghz? Are there people with
    >> experience? Or is it not worth it? this one has 256 kb cache instead of
    >> 128
    >> Kb.

    >
    > For $10, yes. For $100,000, no. Can you narrow it down a little?
    >
    > --
    > Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
    > Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
    > Info: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
    > *ALSO contains links for access to the NON-BETA GG archive interface*
     
    Maurice, Jun 13, 2005
    #4
  5. Maurice wrote:

    > "Blinky the Shark" <> schreef in bericht
    > news:...
    >> Maurice wrote:


    >>> Is it worth to buy a Intel Celeron 2,6 Ghz? Are there people with
    >>> experience? Or is it not worth it? this one has 256 kb cache instead of
    >>> 128
    >>> Kb.


    >> For $10, yes. For $100,000, no. Can you narrow it down a little?


    > It is a Celeron D processor, which are better then the regular celeron. It
    > cost 100 Euro.


    There ya go. Now someone that uses Intel can probably be of more help.

    --
    Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
    Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
    Info: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
    *ALSO contains links for access to the NON-BETA GG archive interface*
     
    Blinky the Shark, Jun 13, 2005
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Brian H¹©

    Re: 2.4 GHz and 2.6 GHz, does 2.6 go that much faster??

    Brian H¹©, Jul 6, 2003, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    601
    Brian H¹©
    Jul 6, 2003
  2. DaveG
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    837
    DaveG
    Jul 6, 2003
  3. ztroll
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    590
    ztroll
    Jul 6, 2003
  4. gz
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    924
    Oldus Fartus
    Nov 5, 2005
  5. Paul
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,458
Loading...

Share This Page