G.SHDSL Back-to-Back with 3700 and 2600

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Rich, Jul 26, 2004.

  1. Rich

    Rich Guest

    Hi

    I'm want to configure 3700 and 2600, both with G.SHDSL wics installed,
    to run a link over an EPS 9 circuit is this possible and what
    configuration do I need on each of the routers.

    Thanks

    Rich
     
    Rich, Jul 26, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Rich

    Thomas Braun Guest

    Thomas Braun, Jul 27, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Rich

    Rich Guest

    Hi Thomas,

    Have tried that smaple config before but it does not work the line
    does no even come up. The other problem is I no nothing about ATM why
    is there a PVC 0/35 then PVC 8/35 also do you have to have a dialer
    interface can't the ATM interface's just communicate without this

    Thanks

    Rich
     
    Rich, Jul 28, 2004
    #3
  4. Rich

    Rich Guest

    The sample config does not seem to work do I need special cables or
    are straight through RJ11 OK

    Rich
     
    Rich, Aug 20, 2004
    #4
  5. In article <>,
    Rich <> wrote:
    > The sample config does not seem to work do I need special cables or
    > are straight through RJ11 OK


    Straight-through RJ11s should be fine.

    I have a back-to-back 828 G.SHDSL configuration working based on the
    sample config; though I think I removed the aal5snap encapsulated pvc (pvc
    0/35). I did notice that the link can take up to several minutes to
    establish (don't know if this is a 'feature' or not).

    Cheers,

    Matt

    --
    Matthew Melbourne
     
    Matthew Melbourne, Aug 20, 2004
    #5
  6. Rich

    AnyBody43 Guest

    (Rich) wrote in message news:<>...
    > The sample config does not seem to work do I need special cables or
    > are straight through RJ11 OK
    >
    > Rich



    You will need acrossover cable.

    I did find the pinouts for these ports the other day but can't
    find them now.
     
    AnyBody43, Aug 21, 2004
    #6
  7. (AnyBody43) writes:
    > (Rich) wrote in message news:<>...
    >> The sample config does not seem to work do I need special cables or
    >> are straight through RJ11 OK
    >>



    >You will need acrossover cable.


    >I did find the pinouts for these ports the other day but can't
    >find them now.



    Huh? How can you cross over a single pair of wire?
    --
    Doug McIntyre
    Network Engineer/Jack of All Trades
    Vector Internet Services, Inc.
     
    Doug McIntyre, Aug 21, 2004
    #7
  8. Rich

    AnyBody43 Guest

    Doug McIntyre <> wrote in message news:<4127a33b$0$65609$>...
    > (AnyBody43) writes:
    > > (Rich) wrote in message news:<>...
    > >> The sample config does not seem to work do I need special cables or
    > >> are straight through RJ11 OK
    > >>

    >
    >
    > >You will need acrossover cable.

    >
    > >I did find the pinouts for these ports the other day but can't
    > >find them now.

    >
    >
    > Huh? How can you cross over a single pair of wire?


    OK. I don't understand this much at all. (Still maybe I'll
    learn something.)

    How not?
    If I cross the single pair of wires connected to
    my car battery the car will not work and may in fact be
    permanently damaged.

    If I cross the single pair of wires on the connection to my
    co-ax ethernet cable I suspect that my station would not work.
    (I do know a little about this - baseband - signalling)

    On the other hand if I cross the single pair or wires
    connecting my bedside lamp to the mains it will still work.

    If I cross the single pair of wires to my 1950 telephone
    I suspect that it will still work. I guess that a modern
    phone is the same and I suppose that a DSL line should not
    be sensitive either.


    Pinout for Cisco DSL ports:
    http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/
    cis2600/hw_inst/wic_inst/wic_doc/wandsl.htm

    As you can see the pins are differentiated by name (Tip - Ring)
    if the polarity did not ever matter would anyone bother?

    ** Anyway, are you saying that a crossover cable is not needed
    in this case? **

    Thanks.
     
    AnyBody43, Aug 23, 2004
    #8
  9. Rich

    Rich Guest

    Rich, Aug 23, 2004
    #9
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Ghazan Haider

    3700 3600 2600 comparison?

    Ghazan Haider, Aug 10, 2003, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,517
    The Real Slim Shady
    Aug 10, 2003
  2. Matthew Melbourne

    Back-to-back G.SHDSL Routers

    Matthew Melbourne, Feb 25, 2004, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    591
    Matthew Melbourne
    Feb 25, 2004
  3. Schmuck

    G.SHDSL back-to-back cabling

    Schmuck, Feb 26, 2004, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    3,309
    Doug McIntyre
    Mar 1, 2004
  4. Sako
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    361
  5. KR
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,309
Loading...

Share This Page