FWSM/PIX and Dynamic PAT using global IP range vs. global interface vs. global IP

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Hoffa, Oct 25, 2006.

  1. Hoffa

    Hoffa Guest

    Greetings all

    I was just woundering one thing while configuring a new PAT setup in
    our FWSM. You have the option of using an IP range, a single IP or the
    IP of the "external" interface as GLOBAL address for the PAT.
    I've searched some of the guides regarding this subject but haven't
    really seen any recommendation when to use the different methods other
    than the possible shortage of ports when using single IP and large
    number of computers.

    Does anyone have any experience in using the different methods and have
    any recommendations? Is there a disadvantage when using GLOBAL
    interface instead of GLOBAL IP for example?

    Regards
    Fredrik Hofreb
     
    Hoffa, Oct 25, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. BinSur
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    5,907
    BinSur
    Jan 13, 2006
  2. swapnendu
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    988
    swapnendu
    Nov 4, 2006
  3. Hoffa
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,732
    Walter Roberson
    Oct 25, 2006
  4. Robert Feinman

    Scene range vs dynamic range

    Robert Feinman, Jun 30, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    712
    Marvin
    Jul 4, 2005
  5. Replies:
    7
    Views:
    2,136
    Marc Luethi
    Nov 26, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page