Flow Inside-outside change only destination port

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Lalo, Apr 20, 2005.

  1. Lalo

    Lalo Guest

    Hello everybody out there using Pixes

    I have a question regarding the change of destination port on PIX

    My intention is to chage from:

    SRC 10.50.50.13:7689 DEST 192.90.90.90:10000

    TO

    SRC 10.50.50.13:7689 DEST 192.90.90.90:443


    The flow is from inside->outside, I tried using and static that look
    like this

    static (outside, inside) tcp 192.90.90.90 10000 192.90.90.90 443
    netmask 255.255.255.255

    But I realize that the static conversion in this flow try to change the
    source of the packet not the destination and what Im really doing with
    the sentence above is saying something like "everything that has source
    99.90.90.90 10000 now must be known as 199.90.90.90:443" obviously this
    does not work

    How can I add the sentence that im looking for??

    Thanks in advanced

    Lalo
     
    Lalo, Apr 20, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. In article <>,
    Lalo <> wrote:
    [PIX]

    :My intention is to chage from:
    :SRC 10.50.50.13:7689 DEST 192.90.90.90:10000
    :TO
    :SRC 10.50.50.13:7689 DEST 192.90.90.90:443

    :static (outside, inside) tcp 192.90.90.90 10000 192.90.90.90 443 netmask 255.255.255.255

    That should work.


    :But I realize that the static conversion in this flow try to change the
    :source of the packet not the destination

    No, you reversed the interfaces, so it will affect the destination.

    :How can I add the sentence that im looking for??

    Did you 'clear xlate' after making the change?
    --
    Feep if you love VT-52's.
     
    Walter Roberson, Apr 20, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Dave
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,605
  2. Dan Rice
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    938
    Dan Rice
    Feb 4, 2005
  3. Replies:
    1
    Views:
    5,699
    mcaissie
    Aug 31, 2006
  4. Yogz
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    3,036
  5. Jack
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    681
Loading...

Share This Page