EVF camera with SLR Lenses?

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Dick Campbell, Oct 5, 2003.

  1. While I am waiting for the right (mainly price) Digital SLR to come along it
    occurs to me that main requirement is that the camera has a "standard" lens
    mount. That could be one of the existing SLR standards or the new Four
    Thirds standard for all I care. I would also like 6 MP just so that I can
    put "MP envy" aside for at least a few years. To be honest my current 3 MP
    camera seems to have as much resolution as I need but I would go for 6 MP
    when buying a new camera just because technology has reached that level.

    I have seen a lot of discussion about view finder alignment in digital SLRs,
    especially relating to the model I am seriously considering.

    Are there any cameras that meet the above requirements and have an
    Electronic View Finder (EVF)? This would obviously overcome any concerns
    about view finder alignment, at least I think so. I am not really fussed
    whether the view finder uses mirrors, pentaprism or EVF as long as what I
    see is what I get. It seems to me the EVF cannot possibly have aligment
    problems.

    Any opinions on the idea of a and "SLR"/EVF combination?

    What are the shortcomings of EVF?

    One factor is I guess the use of a mechanical shutter is a bit tricky, if
    not impossible.

    On the other hand it might be easier to protect the sensor from dust by
    having a sealed chamber for the sensor, something that is difficult achieve
    with the current digital SLRs.

    I had a look at the Kodak DX6940 the other day and it has EVF with 10X
    optical zoom, but obviously a fixed lens system. With a "zoom" range of 38
    to 380, it probably covers all the lenses I am likely to buy anyway. I would
    be more interested if it was 5 MP.

    Dick Campbell
     
    Dick Campbell, Oct 5, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Dick Campbell

    james Guest

    You must be new to the group. This horse has been beaten to death from
    every direction possible for the last month. There are no digital SLR's at
    present that have Electronic View Finders. Two good reasons are that the
    Sensor's in DSLR's are different than the sensors used in Point & Shoot
    Consumer digi-cams. And they cannot be used to provide live video feedback
    for a EVF. And the resolution of current LCD displays are not good enough
    to provide good visual feedback to the photographer.
    Before I got my Cannon 10D, I used a Sony FD-91 with a EVF (thru the lense)
    and in most conditions it worked pretty good. Except, at night or low
    light. Then it was usless. I did take some photos at nite with it but,
    they were terrible. I also, used an old Konica FT-1 Motor 35mm SLR, with
    several lenses.
    That camera took great photos, when the operator (me) was working right !
    Having used both the EVF and the SLR's Standard Thru the Lense View Finder,
    I much prefer the regular TTL view finder. And the Canon's viewfinder is
    great.
    As for the zoom range of the Kodak you mentioned, that is a very wide range
    and you will find that it will not be good all thru it's range. And don't
    forget, the sensor's in the Kodak and camera's like it, do double duty (and
    some do it very very good too) and because of that there is a very noticable
    shutter lag and the sensor is also smaller than any of the current DSLR's on
    the market.
    If I had not already fallen in love with the 10D, and wanted a non-DSLR, I
    think I would wait and see the reviews of the new Sony F828 (8mp) coming out
    soon. Otherwise, just about any of the current crop of DSLR's are worth the
    money if you are really "into" photography. Of course, the investment will
    end up being much more than a camera with a built-in lense, but, it will be
    much more versitile and your investment in lenses will allow you to move on
    someday to a newer camera body (same brand) and not have to buy all new
    lenses.
    james

    "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    news:UUIfb.136659$...
    > While I am waiting for the right (mainly price) Digital SLR to come along

    it
    > occurs to me that main requirement is that the camera has a "standard"

    lens
    > mount. That could be one of the existing SLR standards or the new Four
    > Thirds standard for all I care. I would also like 6 MP just so that I can
    > put "MP envy" aside for at least a few years. To be honest my current 3 MP
    > camera seems to have as much resolution as I need but I would go for 6 MP
    > when buying a new camera just because technology has reached that level.
    >
    > I have seen a lot of discussion about view finder alignment in digital

    SLRs,
    > especially relating to the model I am seriously considering.
    >
    > Are there any cameras that meet the above requirements and have an
    > Electronic View Finder (EVF)? This would obviously overcome any concerns
    > about view finder alignment, at least I think so. I am not really fussed
    > whether the view finder uses mirrors, pentaprism or EVF as long as what I
    > see is what I get. It seems to me the EVF cannot possibly have aligment
    > problems.
    >
    > Any opinions on the idea of a and "SLR"/EVF combination?
    >
    > What are the shortcomings of EVF?
    >
    > One factor is I guess the use of a mechanical shutter is a bit tricky, if
    > not impossible.
    >
    > On the other hand it might be easier to protect the sensor from dust by
    > having a sealed chamber for the sensor, something that is difficult

    achieve
    > with the current digital SLRs.
    >
    > I had a look at the Kodak DX6940 the other day and it has EVF with 10X
    > optical zoom, but obviously a fixed lens system. With a "zoom" range of 38
    > to 380, it probably covers all the lenses I am likely to buy anyway. I

    would
    > be more interested if it was 5 MP.
    >
    > Dick Campbell
    >
    >
     
    james, Oct 5, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Thanks James,

    I don't how I missed other postings on this subject, I would have taken part
    if I had seen them.

    As much as anything, I was wondering whether Digital SLR was really what I
    wanted. I suspect that the answer is yes from what you have said.

    It had occurred to me that EVF would introduce more shutter lag as the
    shutter must be open in view finder mode, then has to close and time the
    shot. This sounds like an issue especially with a focal plane shutter.

    I had also heard that EVF was a problem in low light and I realise that a
    single lens that provides a 10X zoom range is stretching optics to the
    limit.

    Besides, I do miss the total experience using of my Pentax SLR film camera.
    The one I am looking seriously at is the Canon 300D. The price of the Pentax
    digital is such that it doesn't compensate for the cost of not having to buy
    lenses.


    "james" <> wrote in message
    news:NWKfb.25720$...
    > You must be new to the group. This horse has been beaten to death from
    > every direction possible for the last month. There are no digital SLR's

    at
    > present that have Electronic View Finders. Two good reasons are that the
    > Sensor's in DSLR's are different than the sensors used in Point & Shoot
    > Consumer digi-cams. And they cannot be used to provide live video

    feedback
    > for a EVF. And the resolution of current LCD displays are not good enough
    > to provide good visual feedback to the photographer.
    > Before I got my Cannon 10D, I used a Sony FD-91 with a EVF (thru the

    lense)
    > and in most conditions it worked pretty good. Except, at night or low
    > light. Then it was usless. I did take some photos at nite with it but,
    > they were terrible. I also, used an old Konica FT-1 Motor 35mm SLR, with
    > several lenses.
    > That camera took great photos, when the operator (me) was working right !
    > Having used both the EVF and the SLR's Standard Thru the Lense View

    Finder,
    > I much prefer the regular TTL view finder. And the Canon's viewfinder is
    > great.
    > As for the zoom range of the Kodak you mentioned, that is a very wide

    range
    > and you will find that it will not be good all thru it's range. And don't
    > forget, the sensor's in the Kodak and camera's like it, do double duty

    (and
    > some do it very very good too) and because of that there is a very

    noticable
    > shutter lag and the sensor is also smaller than any of the current DSLR's

    on
    > the market.
    > If I had not already fallen in love with the 10D, and wanted a non-DSLR, I
    > think I would wait and see the reviews of the new Sony F828 (8mp) coming

    out
    > soon. Otherwise, just about any of the current crop of DSLR's are worth

    the
    > money if you are really "into" photography. Of course, the investment

    will
    > end up being much more than a camera with a built-in lense, but, it will

    be
    > much more versitile and your investment in lenses will allow you to move

    on
    > someday to a newer camera body (same brand) and not have to buy all new
    > lenses.
    > james
    >
    > "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    > news:UUIfb.136659$...
    > > While I am waiting for the right (mainly price) Digital SLR to come

    along
    > it
    > > occurs to me that main requirement is that the camera has a "standard"

    > lens
    > > mount. That could be one of the existing SLR standards or the new Four
    > > Thirds standard for all I care. I would also like 6 MP just so that I

    can
    > > put "MP envy" aside for at least a few years. To be honest my current 3

    MP
    > > camera seems to have as much resolution as I need but I would go for 6

    MP
    > > when buying a new camera just because technology has reached that level.
    > >
    > > I have seen a lot of discussion about view finder alignment in digital

    > SLRs,
    > > especially relating to the model I am seriously considering.
    > >
    > > Are there any cameras that meet the above requirements and have an
    > > Electronic View Finder (EVF)? This would obviously overcome any concerns
    > > about view finder alignment, at least I think so. I am not really fussed
    > > whether the view finder uses mirrors, pentaprism or EVF as long as what

    I
    > > see is what I get. It seems to me the EVF cannot possibly have aligment
    > > problems.
    > >
    > > Any opinions on the idea of a and "SLR"/EVF combination?
    > >
    > > What are the shortcomings of EVF?
    > >
    > > One factor is I guess the use of a mechanical shutter is a bit tricky,

    if
    > > not impossible.
    > >
    > > On the other hand it might be easier to protect the sensor from dust by
    > > having a sealed chamber for the sensor, something that is difficult

    > achieve
    > > with the current digital SLRs.
    > >
    > > I had a look at the Kodak DX6940 the other day and it has EVF with 10X
    > > optical zoom, but obviously a fixed lens system. With a "zoom" range of

    38
    > > to 380, it probably covers all the lenses I am likely to buy anyway. I

    > would
    > > be more interested if it was 5 MP.
    > >
    > > Dick Campbell
    > >
    > >

    >
    >
     
    Dick Campbell, Oct 5, 2003
    #3
  4. Dick Campbell

    james Guest

    Dick, I think you should head over to : http://www.dpreview.com and check
    out the forums there and especially the one for the 300D. Lot's of new 300D
    owners there that are very excited about their camera purchase. It is
    probably the best bang for the buck, in it's class right now. It is more or
    less a 10D in a plastic body with a few of the advanced features of the 10D
    missing. Had it been available when I bought my 10D it would have made it a
    bit tougher to decide which I wanted. But, having used a 10D for a while
    now, and having gotten to play with a 300D last week, I feel like the
    purchase of the 10D was still the right choice for me. It just feels like a
    more solid camera than the 300D.
    Good luck on whatever camera you end up with. And remember, have fun and
    take lots of pictures !!!
    james

    "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    news:ChLfb.136832$...
    > Thanks James,
    >
    > I don't how I missed other postings on this subject, I would have taken

    part
    > if I had seen them.
    >
    > As much as anything, I was wondering whether Digital SLR was really what I
    > wanted. I suspect that the answer is yes from what you have said.
    >
    > It had occurred to me that EVF would introduce more shutter lag as the
    > shutter must be open in view finder mode, then has to close and time the
    > shot. This sounds like an issue especially with a focal plane shutter.
    >
    > I had also heard that EVF was a problem in low light and I realise that a
    > single lens that provides a 10X zoom range is stretching optics to the
    > limit.
    >
    > Besides, I do miss the total experience using of my Pentax SLR film

    camera.
    > The one I am looking seriously at is the Canon 300D. The price of the

    Pentax
    > digital is such that it doesn't compensate for the cost of not having to

    buy
    > lenses.
    >
    >
    > "james" <> wrote in message
    > news:NWKfb.25720$...
    > > You must be new to the group. This horse has been beaten to death from
    > > every direction possible for the last month. There are no digital SLR's

    > at
    > > present that have Electronic View Finders. Two good reasons are that

    the
    > > Sensor's in DSLR's are different than the sensors used in Point & Shoot
    > > Consumer digi-cams. And they cannot be used to provide live video

    > feedback
    > > for a EVF. And the resolution of current LCD displays are not good

    enough
    > > to provide good visual feedback to the photographer.
    > > Before I got my Cannon 10D, I used a Sony FD-91 with a EVF (thru the

    > lense)
    > > and in most conditions it worked pretty good. Except, at night or low
    > > light. Then it was usless. I did take some photos at nite with it but,
    > > they were terrible. I also, used an old Konica FT-1 Motor 35mm SLR,

    with
    > > several lenses.
    > > That camera took great photos, when the operator (me) was working right

    !
    > > Having used both the EVF and the SLR's Standard Thru the Lense View

    > Finder,
    > > I much prefer the regular TTL view finder. And the Canon's viewfinder

    is
    > > great.
    > > As for the zoom range of the Kodak you mentioned, that is a very wide

    > range
    > > and you will find that it will not be good all thru it's range. And

    don't
    > > forget, the sensor's in the Kodak and camera's like it, do double duty

    > (and
    > > some do it very very good too) and because of that there is a very

    > noticable
    > > shutter lag and the sensor is also smaller than any of the current

    DSLR's
    > on
    > > the market.
    > > If I had not already fallen in love with the 10D, and wanted a non-DSLR,

    I
    > > think I would wait and see the reviews of the new Sony F828 (8mp) coming

    > out
    > > soon. Otherwise, just about any of the current crop of DSLR's are worth

    > the
    > > money if you are really "into" photography. Of course, the investment

    > will
    > > end up being much more than a camera with a built-in lense, but, it will

    > be
    > > much more versitile and your investment in lenses will allow you to move

    > on
    > > someday to a newer camera body (same brand) and not have to buy all new
    > > lenses.
    > > james
    > >
    > > "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    > > news:UUIfb.136659$...
    > > > While I am waiting for the right (mainly price) Digital SLR to come

    > along
    > > it
    > > > occurs to me that main requirement is that the camera has a "standard"

    > > lens
    > > > mount. That could be one of the existing SLR standards or the new Four
    > > > Thirds standard for all I care. I would also like 6 MP just so that I

    > can
    > > > put "MP envy" aside for at least a few years. To be honest my current

    3
    > MP
    > > > camera seems to have as much resolution as I need but I would go for 6

    > MP
    > > > when buying a new camera just because technology has reached that

    level.
    > > >
    > > > I have seen a lot of discussion about view finder alignment in digital

    > > SLRs,
    > > > especially relating to the model I am seriously considering.
    > > >
    > > > Are there any cameras that meet the above requirements and have an
    > > > Electronic View Finder (EVF)? This would obviously overcome any

    concerns
    > > > about view finder alignment, at least I think so. I am not really

    fussed
    > > > whether the view finder uses mirrors, pentaprism or EVF as long as

    what
    > I
    > > > see is what I get. It seems to me the EVF cannot possibly have

    aligment
    > > > problems.
    > > >
    > > > Any opinions on the idea of a and "SLR"/EVF combination?
    > > >
    > > > What are the shortcomings of EVF?
    > > >
    > > > One factor is I guess the use of a mechanical shutter is a bit

    tricky,
    > if
    > > > not impossible.
    > > >
    > > > On the other hand it might be easier to protect the sensor from dust

    by
    > > > having a sealed chamber for the sensor, something that is difficult

    > > achieve
    > > > with the current digital SLRs.
    > > >
    > > > I had a look at the Kodak DX6940 the other day and it has EVF with 10X
    > > > optical zoom, but obviously a fixed lens system. With a "zoom" range

    of
    > 38
    > > > to 380, it probably covers all the lenses I am likely to buy anyway. I

    > > would
    > > > be more interested if it was 5 MP.
    > > >
    > > > Dick Campbell
    > > >
    > > >

    > >
    > >

    >
    >
     
    james, Oct 5, 2003
    #4
  5. Dick Campbell

    Tony Spadaro Guest

    The electronic view finder would have to be very low res and would obviously
    add a lot more draw on the batteries. Until RAM is smaller and batteries are
    stronger, it's impractical.

    --
    http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
    home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
    The Improved Links Pages are at
    http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
    New email - Contact on the Menyou page.
    "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    news:UUIfb.136659$...
    > While I am waiting for the right (mainly price) Digital SLR to come along

    it
    > occurs to me that main requirement is that the camera has a "standard"

    lens
    > mount. That could be one of the existing SLR standards or the new Four
    > Thirds standard for all I care. I would also like 6 MP just so that I can
    > put "MP envy" aside for at least a few years. To be honest my current 3 MP
    > camera seems to have as much resolution as I need but I would go for 6 MP
    > when buying a new camera just because technology has reached that level.
    >
    > I have seen a lot of discussion about view finder alignment in digital

    SLRs,
    > especially relating to the model I am seriously considering.
    >
    > Are there any cameras that meet the above requirements and have an
    > Electronic View Finder (EVF)? This would obviously overcome any concerns
    > about view finder alignment, at least I think so. I am not really fussed
    > whether the view finder uses mirrors, pentaprism or EVF as long as what I
    > see is what I get. It seems to me the EVF cannot possibly have aligment
    > problems.
    >
    > Any opinions on the idea of a and "SLR"/EVF combination?
    >
    > What are the shortcomings of EVF?
    >
    > One factor is I guess the use of a mechanical shutter is a bit tricky, if
    > not impossible.
    >
    > On the other hand it might be easier to protect the sensor from dust by
    > having a sealed chamber for the sensor, something that is difficult

    achieve
    > with the current digital SLRs.
    >
    > I had a look at the Kodak DX6940 the other day and it has EVF with 10X
    > optical zoom, but obviously a fixed lens system. With a "zoom" range of 38
    > to 380, it probably covers all the lenses I am likely to buy anyway. I

    would
    > be more interested if it was 5 MP.
    >
    > Dick Campbell
    >
    >
     
    Tony Spadaro, Oct 5, 2003
    #5
  6. Thanks James,

    I definitely indulge in photography for the enjoyment and I am pretty
    excited about the 300D. So far I have been using a Casio QV3000 which I have
    now been using for 3 years (see http://users.bigpond.net.au/racampbell).
    Such cameras are less than half the price now but I have have gained 3 years
    worth of experience and enjoyment by getting in early so I don't regret it.

    As I mentioned, I do miss the total experince of using and SLR so the 300D
    seems like the one for me at this moment in time.


    "james" <> wrote in message
    news:AZLfb.25749$...
    > Dick, I think you should head over to : http://www.dpreview.com and check
    > out the forums there and especially the one for the 300D. Lot's of new

    300D
    > owners there that are very excited about their camera purchase. It is
    > probably the best bang for the buck, in it's class right now. It is more

    or
    > less a 10D in a plastic body with a few of the advanced features of the

    10D
    > missing. Had it been available when I bought my 10D it would have made it

    a
    > bit tougher to decide which I wanted. But, having used a 10D for a while
    > now, and having gotten to play with a 300D last week, I feel like the
    > purchase of the 10D was still the right choice for me. It just feels like

    a
    > more solid camera than the 300D.
    > Good luck on whatever camera you end up with. And remember, have fun and
    > take lots of pictures !!!
    > james
    >
    > "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    > news:ChLfb.136832$...
    > > Thanks James,
    > >
    > > I don't how I missed other postings on this subject, I would have taken

    > part
    > > if I had seen them.
    > >
    > > As much as anything, I was wondering whether Digital SLR was really what

    I
    > > wanted. I suspect that the answer is yes from what you have said.
    > >
    > > It had occurred to me that EVF would introduce more shutter lag as the
    > > shutter must be open in view finder mode, then has to close and time the
    > > shot. This sounds like an issue especially with a focal plane shutter.
    > >
    > > I had also heard that EVF was a problem in low light and I realise that

    a
    > > single lens that provides a 10X zoom range is stretching optics to the
    > > limit.
    > >
    > > Besides, I do miss the total experience using of my Pentax SLR film

    > camera.
    > > The one I am looking seriously at is the Canon 300D. The price of the

    > Pentax
    > > digital is such that it doesn't compensate for the cost of not having to

    > buy
    > > lenses.
    > >
    > >
    > > "james" <> wrote in message
    > > news:NWKfb.25720$...
    > > > You must be new to the group. This horse has been beaten to death

    from
    > > > every direction possible for the last month. There are no digital

    SLR's
    > > at
    > > > present that have Electronic View Finders. Two good reasons are that

    > the
    > > > Sensor's in DSLR's are different than the sensors used in Point &

    Shoot
    > > > Consumer digi-cams. And they cannot be used to provide live video

    > > feedback
    > > > for a EVF. And the resolution of current LCD displays are not good

    > enough
    > > > to provide good visual feedback to the photographer.
    > > > Before I got my Cannon 10D, I used a Sony FD-91 with a EVF (thru the

    > > lense)
    > > > and in most conditions it worked pretty good. Except, at night or low
    > > > light. Then it was usless. I did take some photos at nite with it

    but,
    > > > they were terrible. I also, used an old Konica FT-1 Motor 35mm SLR,

    > with
    > > > several lenses.
    > > > That camera took great photos, when the operator (me) was working

    right
    > !
    > > > Having used both the EVF and the SLR's Standard Thru the Lense View

    > > Finder,
    > > > I much prefer the regular TTL view finder. And the Canon's viewfinder

    > is
    > > > great.
    > > > As for the zoom range of the Kodak you mentioned, that is a very wide

    > > range
    > > > and you will find that it will not be good all thru it's range. And

    > don't
    > > > forget, the sensor's in the Kodak and camera's like it, do double duty

    > > (and
    > > > some do it very very good too) and because of that there is a very

    > > noticable
    > > > shutter lag and the sensor is also smaller than any of the current

    > DSLR's
    > > on
    > > > the market.
    > > > If I had not already fallen in love with the 10D, and wanted a

    non-DSLR,
    > I
    > > > think I would wait and see the reviews of the new Sony F828 (8mp)

    coming
    > > out
    > > > soon. Otherwise, just about any of the current crop of DSLR's are

    worth
    > > the
    > > > money if you are really "into" photography. Of course, the investment

    > > will
    > > > end up being much more than a camera with a built-in lense, but, it

    will
    > > be
    > > > much more versitile and your investment in lenses will allow you to

    move
    > > on
    > > > someday to a newer camera body (same brand) and not have to buy all

    new
    > > > lenses.
    > > > james
    > > >
    > > > "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    > > > news:UUIfb.136659$...
    > > > > While I am waiting for the right (mainly price) Digital SLR to come

    > > along
    > > > it
    > > > > occurs to me that main requirement is that the camera has a

    "standard"
    > > > lens
    > > > > mount. That could be one of the existing SLR standards or the new

    Four
    > > > > Thirds standard for all I care. I would also like 6 MP just so that

    I
    > > can
    > > > > put "MP envy" aside for at least a few years. To be honest my

    current
    > 3
    > > MP
    > > > > camera seems to have as much resolution as I need but I would go for

    6
    > > MP
    > > > > when buying a new camera just because technology has reached that

    > level.
    > > > >
    > > > > I have seen a lot of discussion about view finder alignment in

    digital
    > > > SLRs,
    > > > > especially relating to the model I am seriously considering.
    > > > >
    > > > > Are there any cameras that meet the above requirements and have an
    > > > > Electronic View Finder (EVF)? This would obviously overcome any

    > concerns
    > > > > about view finder alignment, at least I think so. I am not really

    > fussed
    > > > > whether the view finder uses mirrors, pentaprism or EVF as long as

    > what
    > > I
    > > > > see is what I get. It seems to me the EVF cannot possibly have

    > aligment
    > > > > problems.
    > > > >
    > > > > Any opinions on the idea of a and "SLR"/EVF combination?
    > > > >
    > > > > What are the shortcomings of EVF?
    > > > >
    > > > > One factor is I guess the use of a mechanical shutter is a bit

    > tricky,
    > > if
    > > > > not impossible.
    > > > >
    > > > > On the other hand it might be easier to protect the sensor from dust

    > by
    > > > > having a sealed chamber for the sensor, something that is difficult
    > > > achieve
    > > > > with the current digital SLRs.
    > > > >
    > > > > I had a look at the Kodak DX6940 the other day and it has EVF with

    10X
    > > > > optical zoom, but obviously a fixed lens system. With a "zoom" range

    > of
    > > 38
    > > > > to 380, it probably covers all the lenses I am likely to buy anyway.

    I
    > > > would
    > > > > be more interested if it was 5 MP.
    > > > >
    > > > > Dick Campbell
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >

    > >
    > >

    >
    >
     
    Dick Campbell, Oct 5, 2003
    #6
  7. Dick Campbell

    james Guest

    Very nice photos! Just think of all the fun you'll have with a higher rez
    camera and more lense options !
    james

    "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    news:tsMfb.136931$...
    > Thanks James,
    >
    > I definitely indulge in photography for the enjoyment and I am pretty
    > excited about the 300D. So far I have been using a Casio QV3000 which I

    have
    > now been using for 3 years (see http://users.bigpond.net.au/racampbell).
    > Such cameras are less than half the price now but I have have gained 3

    years
    > worth of experience and enjoyment by getting in early so I don't regret

    it.
    >
    > As I mentioned, I do miss the total experince of using and SLR so the 300D
    > seems like the one for me at this moment in time.
     
    james, Oct 5, 2003
    #7
  8. Exactly.

    I intend to visit New Zealand next year, a very photogenic location, and
    intend to have a 6 MP DLSR with me when I go.

    Thanks for your advice.

    "james" <> wrote in message
    news:JRMfb.29238$...
    > Very nice photos! Just think of all the fun you'll have with a higher rez
    > camera and more lense options !
    > james
    >
    > "Dick Campbell" <> wrote in message
    > news:tsMfb.136931$...
    > > Thanks James,
    > >
    > > I definitely indulge in photography for the enjoyment and I am pretty
    > > excited about the 300D. So far I have been using a Casio QV3000 which I

    > have
    > > now been using for 3 years (see http://users.bigpond.net.au/racampbell).
    > > Such cameras are less than half the price now but I have have gained 3

    > years
    > > worth of experience and enjoyment by getting in early so I don't regret

    > it.
    > >
    > > As I mentioned, I do miss the total experince of using and SLR so the

    300D
    > > seems like the one for me at this moment in time.

    >
    >
     
    Dick Campbell, Oct 5, 2003
    #8
  9. Dick Campbell

    Crownfield Guest

    Dick Campbell wrote:
    >
    > While I am waiting for the right (mainly price) Digital SLR to come along it
    > occurs to me that main requirement is that the camera has a "standard" lens
    > mount. That could be one of the existing SLR standards or the new Four
    > Thirds standard for all I care. I would also like 6 MP just so that I can
    > put "MP envy" aside for at least a few years. To be honest my current 3 MP
    > camera seems to have as much resolution as I need but I would go for 6 MP
    > when buying a new camera just because technology has reached that level.
    >
    > I have seen a lot of discussion about view finder alignment in digital SLRs,
    > especially relating to the model I am seriously considering.
    >
    > Are there any cameras that meet the above requirements and have an
    > Electronic View Finder (EVF)? This would obviously overcome any concerns
    > about view finder alignment, at least I think so. I am not really fussed
    > whether the view finder uses mirrors, pentaprism or EVF as long as what I
    > see is what I get. It seems to me the EVF cannot possibly have aligment
    > problems.
    >
    > Any opinions on the idea of a and "SLR"/EVF combination?
    >
    > What are the shortcomings of EVF?


    lack of critical sharpness when focussing,
    slight lag in the image.

    on the other side, they adjust exposure and sharpness
    for whatever filter you are using, like infra red.
    you still can see, even with an IR filter.

    >
    > One factor is I guess the use of a mechanical shutter is a bit tricky, if
    > not impossible.
    >
    > On the other hand it might be easier to protect the sensor from dust by
    > having a sealed chamber for the sensor, something that is difficult achieve
    > with the current digital SLRs.
    >
    > I had a look at the Kodak DX6940 the other day and it has EVF with 10X
    > optical zoom, but obviously a fixed lens system. With a "zoom" range of 38
    > to 380, it probably covers all the lenses I am likely to buy anyway. I would
    > be more interested if it was 5 MP.
    >
    > Dick Campbell
     
    Crownfield, Oct 5, 2003
    #9
  10. Dick Campbell

    Kenny Guest

    Dead horse on the block waiting for another flogging.

    Not again.... wake me when its over.
     
    Kenny, Oct 5, 2003
    #10
  11. Re: Dead horse on the block waiting for another flogging.

    It hardly seems wot=rth making the comment really.

    "Kenny" <> wrote in message
    news:3f804d8b$0$245$...
    > Not again.... wake me when its over.
    >
    >
     
    Dick Campbell, Oct 5, 2003
    #11
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Nikon 5700: LCD or EVF current drain.

    , Aug 23, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    347
    John O.
    Aug 23, 2003
  2. Mario
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,395
    Mark Hanson
    Apr 19, 2004
  3. RichA
    Replies:
    15
    Views:
    806
  4. Robert Coe

    Re: Sony A55 pellicle mirror camera EVF display is dim

    Robert Coe, Nov 4, 2010, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    356
    John Turco
    Nov 28, 2010
  5. Bruce

    Olympus m43 camera body with EVF - Olympus OM-D

    Bruce, Jan 17, 2012, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    628
    Bruce
    Jan 18, 2012
Loading...

Share This Page