Does no one else think microsoft does a poor job?

Discussion in 'Wireless Networking' started by =?Utf-8?B?SmVyZW15IEx1bmRncmVu?=, Nov 18, 2004.

  1. Honestly, I never have a problem that doesn't have to do with microsoft on my
    computer. It is so damn frustrating. I have to download service packs and
    fixes to solve one problem and ten more crop up.
     
    =?Utf-8?B?SmVyZW15IEx1bmRncmVu?=, Nov 18, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Unfortunately, a lot of problems blamed on Microsoft actually do occur due
    to non-Microsoft bugs. In the wireless world, a lot of problems are actually
    due to bad drivers.

    So let me take this time to say to everyone: If you are having a wireless
    problem, especially if it seemed to start up after installing XP SP2 -
    please make sure you are running the latest drivers/firmware for your
    wireless hardware and make sure the 802.1x option in your network properties
    is not active (unless you are really using 802.1x). Do not use hidden
    SSID's. Stay away from "shared" authentication. And ... using AP's generally
    works better than ad-hoc networking, though ad-hoc networking with Internet
    Connection Sharing (ICS) can be a useful and inexpensive way to go wireless.

    Aside from that... Is there a specific issue you need help with?

    --
    Standard Disclaimers -
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,
    and confers no rights. Please do not send e-mail directly
    to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only.


    "Jeremy Lundgren" <> wrote in
    message news:D...
    > Honestly, I never have a problem that doesn't have to do with microsoft on
    > my
    > computer. It is so damn frustrating. I have to download service packs and
    > fixes to solve one problem and ten more crop up.
     
    Carl DaVault [MSFT], Nov 18, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. =?Utf-8?B?SmVyZW15IEx1bmRncmVu?=

    Jack Guest

    Hi

    Almost all of problem involving Wireless stem from the Entry Level Brands.

    Starting with Marketing claims that do not appear in cohort with reality,
    and end up with buggy firmware and drivers.

    If the manufacturer clearly states that the hardware is compatible with
    WinXP WZC you might as well go with WCZ (AS an Example: Buffalo Tech. States
    so.)

    However some of the Wireless Stuff is sloppy and the manufacturer might not
    bother to make sure that their Hardware/Software is compatible with WCZ.

    So you try WCZ and if it is not working you do not know why, you call the
    manufacturer support and they would tell you that they support their stuff
    and not Windows OS. You call Microsoft and would try to help but you can not
    hold them account to every manufacturer follies.

    Before you know it you would feel like you are in Limbo.

    My policy in lack of clear statement is to start with the manufacturer stuff
    and make sure that the Hardware is in working condition. If it does not work
    the manufacturer have to make it work, or RMA the hardware since you are
    using their Hardware/Software solely. Once it is working you can try to
    switch to WCZ, and as said above choose what seems to work best for you.



    Jack (MVP-Networking).



    "Jeremy Lundgren" <> wrote in
    message news:D...
    > Honestly, I never have a problem that doesn't have to do with microsoft on

    my
    > computer. It is so damn frustrating. I have to download service packs and
    > fixes to solve one problem and ten more crop up.
     
    Jack, Nov 20, 2004
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Thaqalain
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    526
    Thaqalain
    Sep 28, 2005
  2. =?Utf-8?B?dW51c3VhbHBzeWNobw==?=

    Poor reception, poor connection, and dropped signal

    =?Utf-8?B?dW51c3VhbHBzeWNobw==?=, Jun 7, 2006, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    3,853
    Doug Sherman [MVP]
    Jun 7, 2006
  3. Rutger Hauer
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    298
    Rutger Hauer
    Feb 16, 2006
  4. RMZ
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    369
    Tony Sperling
    Feb 2, 2007
  5. Rich

    Poor, poor P&S owner learns too late...

    Rich, May 13, 2009, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    66
    Views:
    1,885
    Bob Larter
    Jun 11, 2009
Loading...

Share This Page