Dialer debug

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Ned Trilby, Jul 9, 2003.

  1. Ned Trilby

    Ned Trilby Guest

    I'm having a problem with ISDN dialer - the remote site appears to
    initiate a connection but the called site never gets the call. Can
    anyone help decipher the debug output.
    TIA,Ned

    SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0E31
    3w1d: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
    3w1d: Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
    3w1d: Calling Party Number i = 0x81, '21212121', Plan:ISDN,
    Type:Unknow
    n
    3w1d: Called Party Number i = 0x81, '0314558800', Plan:ISDN,
    Type:Unknow
    n
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=76
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- INFOc sapi=0 tei=0 ns=0 nr=76
    i=0x08028E315A080381818
    0
    3w1d: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8E31
    3w1d: Cause i = 0x818180 - Unallocated/unassigned number
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: TX -> RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=1
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: CCPRI_ReleaseCall(): bchan 31, call id 0x8E32,
    call type DA
    TA
    3w1d: CCPRI_ReleaseChan released b_dsl 0 B_Chan 31
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x8E32 CALL_CLEARED
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: received CALL_CLEARED call_id 0x8E32
    3w1d: no resend setup, no redial
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Got a disconnect on a non-existent call id =
    0x8E32.
    3w1d: Serial1/0:15: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8E32
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x0 CALL_REJECTION
    3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: rotor dialout [priority]
    3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=10.8.16.201, d=10.16.8.202)
    3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Attempting to dial 0314558800
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Outgoing call id = 0x8E33, dsl 0
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Event: Call to 0314558800 at 64 Kb/s
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: process_pri_call(): call id 0x8E33, number
    0314558800, spee
    d 64, call type DATA, redialed? f, csm call? f, pdata? f
    3w1d: callER type/plan overridden by call_decode
    3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: no call_decode
    3w1d: callED type/plan overridden by call_decode
    3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: not CALLER_NUMBER_IE
    3w1d: building outgoing channel id for call nfas_int is 0 len is 0
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: TX -> INFOc sapi=0 tei=0 ns=76 nr=1
    i=0x08020E3205040288901
    803A9839F6C0A81323134393131323334700B8130323134353538383030
    3w1d: SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0E32
    3w1d: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
    3w1d: Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
    3w1d: Calling Party Number i = 0x81, '21212121', Plan:ISDN,
    Type:Unknow
    n
    3w1d: Called Party Number i = 0x81, '0314558800', Plan:ISDN,
    Type:Unknow
    n
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=77
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- INFOc sapi=0 tei=0 ns=1 nr=77
    i=0x08028E325A080381818
    0
    3w1d: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8E32
    3w1d: Cause i = 0x818180 - Unallocated/unassigned number
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: TX -> RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=2
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: CCPRI_ReleaseCall(): bchan 31, call id 0x8E33,
    call type DA
    TA
    3w1d: CCPRI_ReleaseChan released b_dsl 0 B_Chan 31
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x8E33 CALL_CLEARED
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: received CALL_CLEARED call_id 0x8E33
    3w1d: no resend setup, no redial
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Got a disconnect on a non-existent call id =
    0x8E33.
    3w1d: Serial1/0:15: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8E33
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x0 CALL_REJECTION
    3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: rotor dialout [priority]
    3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=10.8.16.201, d=10.16.8.202)
    3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Attempting to dial 0314558800
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Outgoing call id = 0x8E34, dsl 0
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Event: Call to 0314558800 at 64 Kb/s
    3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: process_pri_call(): call id 0x8E34, number
    0314558800, spee
    d 64, call type DATA, redialed? f, csm call? f, pdata? f
    3w1d: callER type/plan overridden by call_decode
    3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: no call_decode
    3w1d: callED type/plan overridden by call_decode
    3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: not CALLER_NUMBER_IE
    ************************
    Ned Trilby, Jul 9, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Ned Trilby <> wrote:
    > I'm having a problem with ISDN dialer - the remote site appears to
    > initiate a connection but the called site never gets the call. Can
    > anyone help decipher the debug output.
    > TIA,Ned


    > 3w1d: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8E31
    > 3w1d: Cause i = 0x818180 - Unallocated/unassigned number


    The above is the cause

    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Event: Call to 0314558800 at 64 Kb/s


    And if you are in the USA you might wish to look into the 64 kb/s
    since it might well be 56 ....

    --
    __|__ Fabio Sardone|
    ____(0)_____ | http://www.geocities.com/f_sardone/pictures.html
    O o O | Change dot in . and remove .invalid
    Fabio Sardone, Jul 9, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Ned Trilby

    Ned Trilby Guest

    Fabio Sardone <> wrote in message news:<behrgn$8ps$>...
    > Ned Trilby <> wrote:
    > > I'm having a problem with ISDN dialer - the remote site appears to
    > > initiate a connection but the called site never gets the call. Can
    > > anyone help decipher the debug output.
    > > TIA,Ned

    >
    > > 3w1d: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8E31
    > > 3w1d: Cause i = 0x818180 - Unallocated/unassigned number

    >
    > The above is the cause
    >
    > > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Event: Call to 0314558800 at 64 Kb/s

    >
    > And if you are in the USA you might wish to look into the 64 kb/s
    > since it might well be 56 ....


    Thanks Fabio,
    I have checked out the Cisco site. It says:
    "The ISDN number is sent to the switch in the correct format. However,
    the number is not assigned to destination equipment."
    What I am now asking is:
    which number is not assigned - the originator (source) or destination
    ???

    Ned
    Ned Trilby, Jul 10, 2003
    #3
  4. Ned Trilby <> wrote:
    > Fabio Sardone <> wrote in message news:<behrgn$8ps$>...
    >> Ned Trilby <> wrote:
    >> > I'm having a problem with ISDN dialer - the remote site appears to
    >> > initiate a connection but the called site never gets the call. Can
    >> > anyone help decipher the debug output.
    >> > TIA,Ned

    >>
    >> > 3w1d: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8E31
    >> > 3w1d: Cause i = 0x818180 - Unallocated/unassigned number

    >>
    >> The above is the cause
    >>
    >> > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Event: Call to 0314558800 at 64 Kb/s

    >>
    >> And if you are in the USA you might wish to look into the 64 kb/s
    >> since it might well be 56 ....


    > Thanks Fabio,
    > I have checked out the Cisco site. It says:
    > "The ISDN number is sent to the switch in the correct format. However,
    > the number is not assigned to destination equipment."
    > What I am now asking is:
    > which number is not assigned - the originator (source) or destination
    > ???


    I believe it is the destination.
    Do a debug q921 and ensure you get a TEI and if you are in north america the
    SPIDs are accepted ... (little experience with SPIDs I am in Europe)

    HTH
    --
    __|__ Fabio Sardone|
    ____(0)_____ | http://www.geocities.com/f_sardone/pictures.html
    O o O | Change dot in . and remove .invalid
    Fabio Sardone, Jul 11, 2003
    #4
  5. Please post show isdn status

    also turn on debug and post the output
    debug ppp auth
    debug ppp neg
    debug dialer

    Ronnie
    "Ned Trilby" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > I'm having a problem with ISDN dialer - the remote site appears to
    > initiate a connection but the called site never gets the call. Can
    > anyone help decipher the debug output.
    > TIA,Ned
    >
    > SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0E31
    > 3w1d: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
    > 3w1d: Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
    > 3w1d: Calling Party Number i = 0x81, '21212121', Plan:ISDN,
    > Type:Unknow
    > n
    > 3w1d: Called Party Number i = 0x81, '0314558800', Plan:ISDN,
    > Type:Unknow
    > n
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=76
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- INFOc sapi=0 tei=0 ns=0 nr=76
    > i=0x08028E315A080381818
    > 0
    > 3w1d: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8E31
    > 3w1d: Cause i = 0x818180 - Unallocated/unassigned number
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: TX -> RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=1
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: CCPRI_ReleaseCall(): bchan 31, call id 0x8E32,
    > call type DA
    > TA
    > 3w1d: CCPRI_ReleaseChan released b_dsl 0 B_Chan 31
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x8E32 CALL_CLEARED
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: received CALL_CLEARED call_id 0x8E32
    > 3w1d: no resend setup, no redial
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Got a disconnect on a non-existent call id =
    > 0x8E32.
    > 3w1d: Serial1/0:15: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8E32
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x0 CALL_REJECTION
    > 3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: rotor dialout [priority]
    > 3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=10.8.16.201, d=10.16.8.202)
    > 3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Attempting to dial 0314558800
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Outgoing call id = 0x8E33, dsl 0
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Event: Call to 0314558800 at 64 Kb/s
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: process_pri_call(): call id 0x8E33, number
    > 0314558800, spee
    > d 64, call type DATA, redialed? f, csm call? f, pdata? f
    > 3w1d: callER type/plan overridden by call_decode
    > 3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: no call_decode
    > 3w1d: callED type/plan overridden by call_decode
    > 3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: not CALLER_NUMBER_IE
    > 3w1d: building outgoing channel id for call nfas_int is 0 len is 0
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: TX -> INFOc sapi=0 tei=0 ns=76 nr=1
    > i=0x08020E3205040288901
    > 803A9839F6C0A81323134393131323334700B8130323134353538383030
    > 3w1d: SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0E32
    > 3w1d: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890
    > 3w1d: Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
    > 3w1d: Calling Party Number i = 0x81, '21212121', Plan:ISDN,
    > Type:Unknow
    > n
    > 3w1d: Called Party Number i = 0x81, '0314558800', Plan:ISDN,
    > Type:Unknow
    > n
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=77
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: RX <- INFOc sapi=0 tei=0 ns=1 nr=77
    > i=0x08028E325A080381818
    > 0
    > 3w1d: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8E32
    > 3w1d: Cause i = 0x818180 - Unallocated/unassigned number
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: TX -> RRr sapi=0 tei=0 nr=2
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: CCPRI_ReleaseCall(): bchan 31, call id 0x8E33,
    > call type DA
    > TA
    > 3w1d: CCPRI_ReleaseChan released b_dsl 0 B_Chan 31
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x8E33 CALL_CLEARED
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: received CALL_CLEARED call_id 0x8E33
    > 3w1d: no resend setup, no redial
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Got a disconnect on a non-existent call id =
    > 0x8E33.
    > 3w1d: Serial1/0:15: wait for isdn carrier timeout, call id=0x8E33
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x0 CALL_REJECTION
    > 3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: rotor dialout [priority]
    > 3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=10.8.16.201, d=10.16.8.202)
    > 3w1d: Se1/0:15 DDR: Attempting to dial 0314558800
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Outgoing call id = 0x8E34, dsl 0
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: Event: Call to 0314558800 at 64 Kb/s
    > 3w1d: ISDN Se1/0:15: process_pri_call(): call id 0x8E34, number
    > 0314558800, spee
    > d 64, call type DATA, redialed? f, csm call? f, pdata? f
    > 3w1d: callER type/plan overridden by call_decode
    > 3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: no call_decode
    > 3w1d: callED type/plan overridden by call_decode
    > 3w1d: did't copy oct3a reason: not CALLER_NUMBER_IE
    > ************************
    Ronnie Higginbotham, Jul 12, 2003
    #5
  6. > > Thanks Fabio,
    > > I have checked out the Cisco site. It says:
    > > "The ISDN number is sent to the switch in the correct format. However,
    > > the number is not assigned to destination equipment."
    > > What I am now asking is:
    > > which number is not assigned - the originator (source) or destination
    > > ???

    >
    > I believe it is the destination.
    > Do a debug q921 and ensure you get a TEI and if you are in north america the
    > SPIDs are accepted ... (little experience with SPIDs I am in Europe)
    >
    > HTH


    Two questions Fabio -

    1. Isn't this ISDN PRI, so shouldn't the TEI be 0 ? ie. You are not
    assigned one by the ISDN switch when you boot up TEI = 0 for PRI. (Not
    sure about this -- thought it was only the ISDN BRI which are assigned
    TEIs when they boot up).
    2. I thought SPIDs were only for ISDN BRI.

    Thanks
    jonathan fernandes, Jul 12, 2003
    #6
  7. jonathan fernandes <> wrote:
    >> > Thanks Fabio,
    >> > I have checked out the Cisco site. It says:
    >> > "The ISDN number is sent to the switch in the correct format. However,
    >> > the number is not assigned to destination equipment."
    >> > What I am now asking is:
    >> > which number is not assigned - the originator (source) or destination
    >> > ???

    >>
    >> I believe it is the destination.
    >> Do a debug q921 and ensure you get a TEI and if you are in north america the
    >> SPIDs are accepted ... (little experience with SPIDs I am in Europe)
    >>
    >> HTH


    > Two questions Fabio -


    > 1. Isn't this ISDN PRI, so shouldn't the TEI be 0 ? ie. You are not
    > assigned one by the ISDN switch when you boot up TEI = 0 for PRI. (Not
    > sure about this -- thought it was only the ISDN BRI which are assigned
    > TEIs when they boot up).
    > 2. I thought SPIDs were only for ISDN BRI.


    Sorry,
    my mistake assuming it was a BRI (assume= make an ASS of U and ME) :)
    And I have to surrender here, I have no experience with PRI .... only
    theoretical background info.

    Bye
    --
    __|__ Fabio Sardone|
    ____(0)_____ | http://www.geocities.com/f_sardone/pictures.html
    O o O | Change dot in . and remove .invalid
    Fabio Sardone, Jul 12, 2003
    #7
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. mikester
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    628
    Walter Roberson
    Oct 23, 2003
  2. Arjan
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    657
    Arjan
    Apr 2, 2004
  3. John
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    606
  4. John
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    673
  5. Dan Lanciani
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,041
    Dan Lanciani
    Jul 28, 2008
Loading...

Share This Page