C-5060 exposure surprise

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by J Li, Jun 2, 2004.

  1. J Li

    J Li Guest

    Hi,

    I have compared my Olympus C-5060 digicam exposure reading with
    (1) Sekonic handheld meter
    (2) another 35 mm camera
    (3) a colleague's Canon digital camera

    To my surprise, my C-5060's exposure reading is consistantly +1 stop
    overexposure. On the other hand, if I go with the in-camera reading, the
    image actually looks very close to the reality. Maybe my digicam's ISO
    rating is off or something.

    Does any other C-5060 owner have the same experience?

    thanks
     
    J Li, Jun 2, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. J Li

    WebKatz Guest

    "J Li" <> wrote in message
    news:c9kto8$72b$...
    > Hi,
    >
    > I have compared my Olympus C-5060 digicam exposure reading with
    > (1) Sekonic handheld meter
    > (2) another 35 mm camera
    > (3) a colleague's Canon digital camera
    >
    > To my surprise, my C-5060's exposure reading is consistantly +1 stop
    > overexposure. On the other hand, if I go with the in-camera reading, the
    > image actually looks very close to the reality. Maybe my digicam's ISO
    > rating is off or something.
    >


    Your mileage may vary... e.g. F8 ain't always f8.


    Dave
     
    WebKatz, Jun 3, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. JTT

    MCSA Surprise

    JTT, Aug 13, 2003, in forum: MCSE
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    545
    RoGuE
    Aug 15, 2003
  2. Mah  -  Dee

    70-227 - surprise...

    Mah - Dee, Sep 2, 2003, in forum: MCSE
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    826
    Maestro
    Sep 3, 2003
  3. Webster

    What a surprise - MCSE 2000

    Webster, Sep 27, 2003, in forum: MCSE
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    487
    Webster
    Sep 28, 2003
  4. S. S.
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    574
    Dave Martindale
    Jun 24, 2004
  5. Replies:
    2
    Views:
    859
Loading...

Share This Page