Are signatures with URLs considered spam?

Discussion in 'Computer Security' started by Nick, Oct 30, 2005.

  1. Nick

    Nick Guest

    I understand the point of using URLs as a reference to a certain subject
    being discussed, but using a signature with (many)URLs in_every_post, isn't
    it some kind of advertising (spam)?

    Thanks

    Nick
     
    Nick, Oct 30, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Nick

    Management Guest

    Nick wrote:
    > I understand the point of using URLs as a reference to a certain subject
    > being discussed, but using a signature with (many)URLs in_every_post, isn't
    > it some kind of advertising (spam)?
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Nick
    >
    >


    Not spam by definition. Advertising, yes in the widest sense.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

    Charlie.

    --
    Broadcasting to the environs
    www.radiowymsey.org
     
    Management, Oct 30, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. "Nick" <> wrote in message
    news:mo89f.354059$oW2.150955@pd7tw1no...
    >I understand the point of using URLs as a reference to a certain subject
    > being discussed, but using a signature with (many)URLs in_every_post,
    > isn't
    > it some kind of advertising (spam)?


    This is off-topic for this newsgroup. Beter whould be a group about
    ethics/moral in this respect.

    Next having URLs in your signature does not imply advertising. Advertising
    does not imply spam. Theirfor URLs in your signature does not imply
    spamming. Therefor you statement is not always true. Thus the answer you are
    looking for is very debatable, especially since 'spam' is a very vague word.
    More importantly it is specific for each person asked.

    Perhaps you are seeking for an answer to the off-topic discussion in the
    "Banned URL" thread?

    - Joris
     
    Joris Dobbelsteen, Oct 30, 2005
    #3
  4. On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:36:02 GMT, in alt.computer.security , "Nick"
    <> in <mo89f.354059$oW2.150955@pd7tw1no> wrote:

    >I understand the point of using URLs as a reference to a certain subject
    >being discussed, but using a signature with (many)URLs in_every_post, isn't
    >it some kind of advertising (spam)?


    Many is a term of art.* And advertising seems to imply, at least when
    it is offensive, a goal of selling something. I put some information
    in my sig regarding a political issue. I don't see why that offends so
    many people.

    *Unless we are trolls, in which case "many" is four: one, two, three,
    many, many one, many two, ... lots.



    --
    Matt Silberstein

    Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

    http://www.beawitness.org
    http://www.darfurgenocide.org
    http://www.savedarfur.org

    "Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
     
    Matt Silberstein, Oct 30, 2005
    #4
  5. Nick

    Jim Watt Guest

    On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:36:02 GMT, "Nick" <> wrote:

    >I understand the point of using URLs as a reference to a certain subject
    >being discussed, but using a signature with (many)URLs in_every_post, isn't
    >it some kind of advertising (spam)?
    >
    >Thanks
    >
    >Nick


    Long signatures, even witty ones quicky become tedious and may
    be interepreted as spam. Some newsgroups complain if its longer than
    a certain number of lines - post a long sig to demon.local and see the
    fun. Keep it short ... (quickly checking mine)
    --
    Jim Watt
    http://www.gibnet.com
     
    Jim Watt, Oct 30, 2005
    #5
  6. Nick

    Steve Welsh Guest

    Nick wrote:
    > I understand the point of using URLs as a reference to a certain subject
    > being discussed, but using a signature with (many)URLs in_every_post, isn't
    > it some kind of advertising (spam)?
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Nick


    How can a single "href" type URL in an e-mail sig possibly be regarded
    as SPAM?

    I can understand that ISPs have to take a view, because they may (or may
    not) intercept many SPAM mails in connection with that URL.

    But, FFS, hot under the collar, or what! A URL in a sig file is going to
    consume, what - about 100 BYTES for the link, plus maybe another 50
    BYTES for the description = total 150 BYTES.

    Now, I don't personally call that SPAM! If people are stoopid enough to
    follow the link and get a shed-load of trouble, that is their problem.

    As far as I am concerned, SPAM is a full heads-up e-mail about teen-sex,
    viagra, politics, whatever that lands in my REAL e-mail In Box that I
    don't want, and never requested!

    I have followed a number of `sig file' URLs off this and other
    discussion groups, and found much interesting and useful information
    (thanks, Jim), but *that was my choice*.

    I guess it comes down to `Big Brother Is Watching You' - and I don't
    particularly like any form of `Big Brother' watching me....

    Steve
     
    Steve Welsh, Oct 30, 2005
    #6
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. William W. Plummer

    HTML Considered evil, but why?

    William W. Plummer, Feb 8, 2005, in forum: Firefox
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    527
    Moz Champion
    Feb 10, 2005
  2. Nocturnal
    Replies:
    104
    Views:
    2,691
  3. C A Preston

    Spam-Spam and more Spam

    C A Preston, Apr 12, 2004, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    700
    Hywel
    Apr 12, 2004
  4. Ryan Jacobs
    Replies:
    18
    Views:
    453
    Patrick Bold
    Jun 19, 2004
  5. Clwddncr
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    771
    Dave - Dave.net.nz
    Feb 7, 2005
Loading...

Share This Page