AK raw shooter

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by BillU, May 31, 2006.

  1. BillU

    BillU Guest

    From a current news thread in rec.photo.digital
    I am about to skim the rest of the thread
    ---------
    My wife and I have just returned from a cruise to Alaska, where we both
    took a lot of photos. On this trip we shot all raw, I found to my
    delight that it was almost impossible to over expose an image when
    shooting raw.

    Here are two photos that were saved because I was shooting raw, both
    would have been way over exposed if I was shooting jpeg.
    http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/61045238
    http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/61044980

    In both cases I show what the camera jpeg would have looked like next
    to what I recovered using the raw file.

    Once we got home I decided to do a test to see just how much over
    exposed a photo can be and still be saved with the raw file. For this
    test I shot in the raw+jpeg mode so I could get the jpeg exactly as the
    camera produces it. In the test I shot at the normal meter setting and
    then two stops over exposed. In this image there are three photos, the
    top one is the jpeg from the camera at normal exposure, the middle one
    is the camera jpeg two stops over exposed, the bottom is from the raw
    file that was captured at the same time, converted using Photoshop
    Elements 3. Note I adjusted the color balance as well as the jpeg
    images looked a little on the cool side to me.

    http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/61045031

    In the past when shooting jpegs I would spend a lot of time looking at
    histograms to make sure I was not blowing out the highlights. On this
    trip I pretty much just took photos and had to worry about the
    histograms far less.

    There is a perception by some that shooting raw is more work then
    shooting jpegs. The more I shoot raw the more I realize that it is far
    easier to shoot in raw then jpeg. I simply don't have to take the
    time on every shot to see if I have blown the highlights.

    BTW here is a small sampling of the photo I took on the trip.
    http://www.pbase.com/konascott/alaska

    Scott
     
    BillU, May 31, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. BillU

    D Mac Guest

    BillU wrote:
    >> From a current news thread in rec.photo.digital
    >> I am about to skim the rest of the thread
    >> ---------
    >> My wife and I have just returned from a cruise to Alaska, where we
    >> both took a lot of photos. On this trip we shot all raw, I found to
    >> my delight that it was almost impossible to over expose an image when
    >> shooting raw.
    >>
    >> Here are two photos that were saved because I was shooting raw, both
    >> would have been way over exposed if I was shooting jpeg.
    >> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/61045238
    >> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/61044980
    >>
    >> Scott


    If obtaining correct exposure is the only reason you capture RAW, you really
    do need to learn more about the subject.
     
    D Mac, May 31, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. BillU

    Mark² Guest

    D Mac wrote:
    > BillU wrote:
    >>> From a current news thread in rec.photo.digital
    >>> I am about to skim the rest of the thread
    >>> ---------
    >>> My wife and I have just returned from a cruise to Alaska, where we
    >>> both took a lot of photos. On this trip we shot all raw, I found to
    >>> my delight that it was almost impossible to over expose an image
    >>> when shooting raw.
    >>>
    >>> Here are two photos that were saved because I was shooting raw, both
    >>> would have been way over exposed if I was shooting jpeg.
    >>> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/61045238
    >>> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/61044980
    >>>
    >>> Scott

    >
    > If obtaining correct exposure is the only reason you capture RAW, you
    > really do need to learn more about the subject.


    Exposure correction (shadow detail and highlight capture) is a HUGE aspect
    of why RAW is so powerful.
    The only other MAJOR factors are white balance and non-compression factors.

    What other biggie would you have him obsess over, Doug?

    --
    Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
    www.pbase.com/markuson
     
    Mark², May 31, 2006
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. simon

    Pentax *istDL and Raw Shooter Essentials..?

    simon, Sep 5, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    383
    Pete D
    Sep 6, 2005
  2. David J. Littleboy

    Raw Shooter Premium available!

    David J. Littleboy, Oct 28, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    14
    Views:
    498
    W (winhag)
    Oct 31, 2005
  3. Bill Hilton

    RAW Shooter Premium - did you upgrade or not?

    Bill Hilton, Nov 7, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    301
    Chip Gallo
    Nov 8, 2005
  4. Don

    breeze browser pro and Raw Shooter premium

    Don, Nov 13, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    349
  5. Steven Wandy

    Lightoom worth it for a non-RAW shooter?

    Steven Wandy, Feb 21, 2007, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    322
    Steven Wandy
    Feb 22, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page