Acceptable Perfmon values tested on the 70-291??

Discussion in 'MCSE' started by ISApose, Dec 4, 2008.

  1. ISApose

    ISApose Guest

    Hello, I am doing practice questions on the 70-291 and one of them asked to
    figure out why response times were slow with a server.

    they show a table with average, minimum, and maximum performance counter
    values of Logical Disk, memory, NIC, and proc.

    Then asks which component is the problem. I guessed wrong, and the
    explanation states:

    "The HDD is the most likely cause of the problem, as indicated by the high
    Logical Disk - Ave Disk Queue Length values in the exhibit. This counter
    monitors the number of both read and write requests that were queued for the
    selected disk during the sample interval. An acceptable value for this
    counter can be determined by adding 2 to the number of spindles present in
    the system.... so on, and so on"

    QUESTION: Should I really study accepable values for performance counters??
    This information is nowhere in the Microsoft Press book for 70-291.

    Is this runoff from 70-290?
     
    ISApose, Dec 4, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. ISApose

    JohnB Guest

    Where is your practice test question from?

    I'm studying for 291 also, and taking practice tests from Kaplan IT, and
    there isn't a single question in there like that. There were lots of those
    questions on the 290 practice tests.



    "ISApose" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Hello, I am doing practice questions on the 70-291 and one of them asked
    > to
    > figure out why response times were slow with a server.
    >
    > they show a table with average, minimum, and maximum performance counter
    > values of Logical Disk, memory, NIC, and proc.
    >
    > Then asks which component is the problem. I guessed wrong, and the
    > explanation states:
    >
    > "The HDD is the most likely cause of the problem, as indicated by the high
    > Logical Disk - Ave Disk Queue Length values in the exhibit. This counter
    > monitors the number of both read and write requests that were queued for
    > the
    > selected disk during the sample interval. An acceptable value for this
    > counter can be determined by adding 2 to the number of spindles present in
    > the system.... so on, and so on"
    >
    > QUESTION: Should I really study accepable values for performance
    > counters??
    > This information is nowhere in the Microsoft Press book for 70-291.
    >
    > Is this runoff from 70-290?
     
    JohnB, Dec 4, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. ISApose

    timm88 Guest

    I took the 70-291 test a couple months ago...I don't remember if there were
    perfmon questions on it , but the microsoft press book I used covers it in
    chapter 12. I know I had those questions on the 70-290 test.

    "ISApose" wrote:

    > Hello, I am doing practice questions on the 70-291 and one of them asked to
    > figure out why response times were slow with a server.
    >
    > they show a table with average, minimum, and maximum performance counter
    > values of Logical Disk, memory, NIC, and proc.
    >
    > Then asks which component is the problem. I guessed wrong, and the
    > explanation states:
    >
    > "The HDD is the most likely cause of the problem, as indicated by the high
    > Logical Disk - Ave Disk Queue Length values in the exhibit. This counter
    > monitors the number of both read and write requests that were queued for the
    > selected disk during the sample interval. An acceptable value for this
    > counter can be determined by adding 2 to the number of spindles present in
    > the system.... so on, and so on"
    >
    > QUESTION: Should I really study accepable values for performance counters??
    > This information is nowhere in the Microsoft Press book for 70-291.
    >
    > Is this runoff from 70-290?
     
    timm88, Dec 5, 2008
    #3
  4. "timm88" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >I took the 70-291 test a couple months ago...I don't remember if there were
    > perfmon questions on it , but the microsoft press book I used covers it
    > in
    > chapter 12. I know I had those questions on the 70-290 test.


    All MSPress Training Kits have references to the specific objectives covered
    in the chapter.

    In the case of the 70-291 Chapter 12 ("Maintaining a Network
    Infrastructure")

    Exam Objectives in this Chapter:

    Monitor network traffic
    Troubleshoot connectivity to the Internet
    Troubleshoot server services

    >> Hello, I am doing practice questions on the 70-291 and one of them asked
    >> to
    >> figure out why response times were slow with a server.
    >>
    >> they show a table with average, minimum, and maximum performance counter
    >> values of Logical Disk, memory, NIC, and proc.
    >>
    >> Then asks which component is the problem.


    But I don't see any question like this in my 70-291 MSPress TK Chapter 12...

    So I guess we're back to the original question:

    Where is your practice test question coming from???

    --
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)

    MS WSUS Website: http://www.microsoft.com/wsus
    My Websites: http://www.onsitechsolutions.com;
    http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com
    My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Lawrence.Garvin
     
    Lawrence Garvin \(MVP\), Dec 5, 2008
    #4
  5. "ISApose" <> wrote in message
    news:...

    > QUESTION: Should I really study accepable values for performance
    > counters??


    You *need* to know basic performance requirements for the four subsystems of
    interest.

    e.g.
    Disk Queue Length <= 2 per spindle
    CPU Utilization <= 80%
    NIC Utilization <=50% (given that 65% utilization is about the practical
    ceiling of a NIC)


    Remember, 70-291 is about the Network Infrastructure. Everything in a
    network infrastructure is dependent on the performance of the servers
    supporting that infrastructure.

    Of specific note would be the objectives:

    Implementing, Managing, and Maintaining Name Resolution
    Monitor DNS. Tools might include System Monitor, Event Viewer, Replication
    Monitor, and DNS debug logs.

    Maintaining a Network Infrastructure
    Monitor network traffic. Tools might include Network Monitor and System
    Monitor.


    > This information is nowhere in the Microsoft Press book for 70-291.


    It's also possible that this leaked over from the 70-293.

    --
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)

    MS WSUS Website: http://www.microsoft.com/wsus
    My Websites: http://www.onsitechsolutions.com;
    http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com
    My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Lawrence.Garvin
     
    Lawrence Garvin \(MVP\), Dec 5, 2008
    #5
  6. ISApose

    ISApose Guest

    Transender

    "JohnB" wrote:

    > Where is your practice test question from?
    >
    > I'm studying for 291 also, and taking practice tests from Kaplan IT, and
    > there isn't a single question in there like that. There were lots of those
    > questions on the 290 practice tests.
    >
    >
    >
    > "ISApose" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > Hello, I am doing practice questions on the 70-291 and one of them asked
    > > to
    > > figure out why response times were slow with a server.
    > >
    > > they show a table with average, minimum, and maximum performance counter
    > > values of Logical Disk, memory, NIC, and proc.
    > >
    > > Then asks which component is the problem. I guessed wrong, and the
    > > explanation states:
    > >
    > > "The HDD is the most likely cause of the problem, as indicated by the high
    > > Logical Disk - Ave Disk Queue Length values in the exhibit. This counter
    > > monitors the number of both read and write requests that were queued for
    > > the
    > > selected disk during the sample interval. An acceptable value for this
    > > counter can be determined by adding 2 to the number of spindles present in
    > > the system.... so on, and so on"
    > >
    > > QUESTION: Should I really study accepable values for performance
    > > counters??
    > > This information is nowhere in the Microsoft Press book for 70-291.
    > >
    > > Is this runoff from 70-290?

    >
    >
    >
     
    ISApose, Dec 5, 2008
    #6
  7. ISApose

    ISApose Guest

    Ok, this makes sense then. Thanks for your help everyone!

    "Lawrence Garvin (MVP)" wrote:

    > "ISApose" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    >
    > > QUESTION: Should I really study accepable values for performance
    > > counters??

    >
    > You *need* to know basic performance requirements for the four subsystems of
    > interest.
    >
    > e.g.
    > Disk Queue Length <= 2 per spindle
    > CPU Utilization <= 80%
    > NIC Utilization <=50% (given that 65% utilization is about the practical
    > ceiling of a NIC)
    >
    >
    > Remember, 70-291 is about the Network Infrastructure. Everything in a
    > network infrastructure is dependent on the performance of the servers
    > supporting that infrastructure.
    >
    > Of specific note would be the objectives:
    >
    > Implementing, Managing, and Maintaining Name Resolution
    > Monitor DNS. Tools might include System Monitor, Event Viewer, Replication
    > Monitor, and DNS debug logs.
    >
    > Maintaining a Network Infrastructure
    > Monitor network traffic. Tools might include Network Monitor and System
    > Monitor.
    >
    >
    > > This information is nowhere in the Microsoft Press book for 70-291.

    >
    > It's also possible that this leaked over from the 70-293.
    >
    > --
    > Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP(x2), MCTS(x5), MCP(x7), MCBMSP
    > Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    > Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
    >
    > MS WSUS Website: http://www.microsoft.com/wsus
    > My Websites: http://www.onsitechsolutions.com;
    > http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com
    > My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Lawrence.Garvin
    >
    >
     
    ISApose, Dec 5, 2008
    #7
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. ciscoham

    Acceptable Load on WAN Link

    ciscoham, Oct 17, 2005, in forum: Cisco
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    508
    ciscoham
    Oct 20, 2005
  2. Martin ©¿©¬  @REMOVETHIS.plus.com

    Cut large mp3 into acceptable pieces to fit cd - how?

    Martin ©¿©¬ @REMOVETHIS.plus.com, Feb 27, 2005, in forum: Computer Support
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,898
    Martin ©¿©¬ @REMOVETHIS.plus.com
    Mar 1, 2005
  3. ian

    whats an acceptable number of hot pixels?

    ian, Nov 23, 2003, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    637
    Azzz1588
    Nov 27, 2003
  4. Marc Wossner

    Raw values and exposure values

    Marc Wossner, Jun 19, 2008, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    351
    Marc Wossner
    Jun 19, 2008
  5. Ben UK
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    352
    Power Point
    Sep 18, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page