A Comparison of the Gimp and Photoshop Mindsets

Discussion in 'NZ Computing' started by Lawrence D'Oliveiro, May 31, 2009.

  1. Several years ago, I was involved in developing an image-processing app that
    was also to be made available as a Photoshop plug-in.

    This was in the days of Photoshop 6.0. Back then, all the information you
    needed to develop plug-ins was available for free from Adobe's website--
    software developer kit (SDK), docs, sample code, everything.

    In the latter part of the project, Photoshop 7.0 came out. Suddenly, you had
    to sign an non-disclosure agreement before Adobe would give you permission
    to obtain the SDK. To make it worse, all the SDKs for previous versions
    disappeared from their website. To claim that "trade secrets" in the newer
    version made the restrictions necessary might make some sense, but how could
    you possibly justify applying that retroactively to downloads that had
    previously been freely available?

    Anyway, yesterday I was reading a few articles about Gimp. One was a tip
    about how to create a "Michael Orton"-type effect. The others were
    tutorials on how to write your own Gimp plug-ins.

    Now, when you hear the term "plug-in", you're probably thinking about
    something that has to be written in a language like C or C++, and needs to
    be built in a special way, using special interfaces and libraries provided
    in the SDK, so that it can be recognized by the host app. You can do this
    with Gimp, but you don't have to: it turns out you can also write plug-ins
    in a scripting language like Python. And you can do it in very little code--
    I was able to implement the Michael Orton effect in just about three dozen
    lines of code, complete with help text, a settings dialog, and the
    appearance of the filter effect as a single step in your Undo/Redo history.

    Photoshop has this feature called "automation", which is supposed to make it
    easier for users to perform repetitive tasks. Sounds like it should be
    something resembling a scripting language, only it's not, really: as far as
    I can tell, it lacks looping and conditionals, so it can really only perform
    a linear sequence of steps, and it cannot adapt to different situations.

    Gimp doesn't have this feature, because it doesn't need it: just write your
    repetitive sequence as a plug-in, because it's so easy to do. If you use
    Python, it's not some cut-down Python built into Gimp; it's the full,
    standard Python installed into your system, so your plug-in can do anything
    any other Python script can do.

    Just to make things easier, Gimp provides an interactive environment where
    you can directly try out things: a Python "console" window where you can
    type code snippets to see what their effect might be, and a "procedure
    browser" to help you find all the calls that your plug-in can make to Gimp,
    with descriptions of what they do. These features are not part of some
    separate SDK; they're ones that come standard with Gimp.

    To sum up, Photoshop has "plug-ins" and "automation", and nothing in-
    between: "plug-ins" can do anything, but are restricted by nondisclosure,
    because Adobe wants to use them as additional leverage to lock users into
    its products. "Automation" is available to all its users, but is restricted
    in what it can do.

    In Gimp, on the other hand, the "plug-in" concept covers a whole range of
    levels of adding enhancements, and there are no artificial boundaries
    between the levels--you are free to use what suits.

    That's the difference between a mindset that sees customers as revenue
    sources to be managed and exploited, and one that views them as people to be
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, May 31, 2009
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Michael

    Alternative to PhotoShop. The GIMP

    Michael, Nov 14, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Jim Townsend
    Nov 15, 2004
  2. Robert11
    Gautam Majumdar
    Mar 7, 2005
  3. Karen Hill

    Apple releases Photoshop killer: Aperture. Where's GIMP?

    Karen Hill, Oct 19, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Nov 3, 2005
  4. PGPS

    What does Gamma value mean in Photoshop/GIMP?

    PGPS, Jun 6, 2007, in forum: Digital Photography
    Jun 13, 2007
  5. measekite

    Gimp vs Photoshop

    measekite, Aug 26, 2007, in forum: Digital Photography