71-553, 71-554 Exams

Discussion in 'Microsoft Certification' started by =?Utf-8?B?Ui4gSWFuIExlZQ==?=, Jan 25, 2006.

  1. I recently received an email that briefly mentioning these beta tests. These
    tests are defined as UPGRADE tests to upgrade you from MCSD to MCPD. As I
    understand it MCSD is still the top certification so how can this be
    considered an upgrade? Since I am already an MCSD why would I want to take
    these exams?

    Thanks,
     
    =?Utf-8?B?Ui4gSWFuIExlZQ==?=, Jan 25, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Thos exams will upgrade your skills to the New Certification based on .Net
    2005

    --
    ..rev.mct.mcngp.44

    It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
    accepting it.
    ~Aristotle
    ..
    "R. Ian Lee" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >I recently received an email that briefly mentioning these beta tests.
    >These
    > tests are defined as UPGRADE tests to upgrade you from MCSD to MCPD. As I
    > understand it MCSD is still the top certification so how can this be
    > considered an upgrade? Since I am already an MCSD why would I want to
    > take
    > these exams?
    >
    > Thanks,
     
    The Rev [MCT], Jan 25, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. So, then you still have to take another test or two to get MCSD (.Net 2.0)?
    Wouldn't an "upgrade" make more sense if it took you from MCSD (.Net 1.1) to
    MCSD (.Net 2.0)?

    Do these exams only count if you are currently a MCSD (.NET 1.1)? What if
    you're a MCSD (6.0)?

    I agree that .Net 2.0 is a wonderful improvement, but I don't see that it's
    so different from 1.1 that it warrants having to take so many additional
    tests to "upgrade" your certification.

    I was just comparing MCPD Ent. Dev to MCSD (.Net 2.0) and it is really
    confusing to tell what you would still have to take to get MCSD (.Net 2.0) if
    you did take the upgrade tests or why anyone would ever go this route. As I
    understand it, without the upgrade tests a person would have to take NINE
    tests just to get to MCPD and then ??? more tests to get to MCSD. Or, if you
    just take the MCSD route you only have to take 5 tests. I've always been one
    to defend MS's certification strategies but this is just a blatant money
    making scheme.

    I'd love to hear someone make sense of all this.

    Ian


    "The Rev [MCT]" wrote:

    > Thos exams will upgrade your skills to the New Certification based on .Net
    > 2005
    >
    > --
    > ..rev.mct.mcngp.44
    >
    > It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
    > accepting it.
    > ~Aristotle
    > ..
    > "R. Ian Lee" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > >I recently received an email that briefly mentioning these beta tests.
    > >These
    > > tests are defined as UPGRADE tests to upgrade you from MCSD to MCPD. As I
    > > understand it MCSD is still the top certification so how can this be
    > > considered an upgrade? Since I am already an MCSD why would I want to
    > > take
    > > these exams?
    > >
    > > Thanks,

    >
    >
    >
     
    =?Utf-8?B?Ui4gSWFuIExlZQ==?=, Jan 25, 2006
    #3
  4. It's because they've split several certifications apart. Like the MCDBA for
    example it's now MCITP: DBA or MCITP:DBP one for programming and the other
    for admin.

    The MCSD will not be offered for the new line of Certs. Instead .Net 2 falls
    under one of the MCTS line with is the Technology Specialist line. Also the
    Development is broken into three lines as well now. So Lets say you are an
    MCSD in .NET and you are going for the MCPDEAD (Professional Developer:
    Enterprise Applications Developer) It has a prerequisite , the MCTS exams. I
    know it's a bit confusing and to be honest I'm not entirely certain I'm
    correct, but the way I read it is plainly that you need to take 2 exams only
    (The upgrade exams).

    If you are an MCSD in VB 6.0 you do not have a direct upgrade path to the
    MCPD: EAD

    Hope this helps, good luck...

    --
    ..rev.mct.mcngp.44

    It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
    accepting it.
    ~Aristotle
    ..
    "R. Ian Lee" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > So, then you still have to take another test or two to get MCSD (.Net
    > 2.0)?
    > Wouldn't an "upgrade" make more sense if it took you from MCSD (.Net 1.1)
    > to
    > MCSD (.Net 2.0)?
    >
    > Do these exams only count if you are currently a MCSD (.NET 1.1)? What if
    > you're a MCSD (6.0)?
    >
    > I agree that .Net 2.0 is a wonderful improvement, but I don't see that
    > it's
    > so different from 1.1 that it warrants having to take so many additional
    > tests to "upgrade" your certification.
    >
    > I was just comparing MCPD Ent. Dev to MCSD (.Net 2.0) and it is really
    > confusing to tell what you would still have to take to get MCSD (.Net 2.0)
    > if
    > you did take the upgrade tests or why anyone would ever go this route. As
    > I
    > understand it, without the upgrade tests a person would have to take NINE
    > tests just to get to MCPD and then ??? more tests to get to MCSD. Or, if
    > you
    > just take the MCSD route you only have to take 5 tests. I've always been
    > one
    > to defend MS's certification strategies but this is just a blatant money
    > making scheme.
    >
    > I'd love to hear someone make sense of all this.
    >
    > Ian
    >
    >
    > "The Rev [MCT]" wrote:
    >
    >> Thos exams will upgrade your skills to the New Certification based on
    >> .Net
    >> 2005
    >>
    >> --
    >> ..rev.mct.mcngp.44
    >>
    >> It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought
    >> without
    >> accepting it.
    >> ~Aristotle
    >> ..
    >> "R. Ian Lee" <> wrote in message
    >> news:...
    >> >I recently received an email that briefly mentioning these beta tests.
    >> >These
    >> > tests are defined as UPGRADE tests to upgrade you from MCSD to MCPD.
    >> > As I
    >> > understand it MCSD is still the top certification so how can this be
    >> > considered an upgrade? Since I am already an MCSD why would I want to
    >> > take
    >> > these exams?
    >> >
    >> > Thanks,

    >>
    >>
    >>
     
    The Rev [MCT], Jan 25, 2006
    #4
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Toty Santana

    71-553 and 71-554 experience

    Toty Santana, Jan 22, 2006, in forum: MCSD
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    1,597
    =?Utf-8?B?S2FzaVA=?=
    Mar 12, 2006
  2. Stan
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    4,392
    DavidSan
    Mar 12, 2006
  3. Death from Above

    Passed 70-551, 70-552, 70-553 and 70-554...

    Death from Above, Apr 6, 2006, in forum: MCSD
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,186
    Simon Hart
    Apr 15, 2006
  4. JP
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    843
  5. =?Utf-8?B?QmxldGNoMTk3MQ==?=

    MCSD Upgrade Exams (070-553 & 070-554)

    =?Utf-8?B?QmxldGNoMTk3MQ==?=, May 15, 2006, in forum: MCSD
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,686
Loading...

Share This Page