64-bit boot order

Discussion in 'Windows 64bit' started by =?Utf-8?B?SmFzb24=?=, Jul 14, 2005.

  1. I can't seem to find a list of the boot order or boot proces for 64-bit
    machines. Has this changed? Is it still NTLDR-Boot.ini-Ntdetect.com----
    ETC?

    Thanks!
    Jason
     
    =?Utf-8?B?SmFzb24=?=, Jul 14, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Hello Jason,
    For X64 the boot order is the same as x86 so yes your response is correct.
    Thanks,
    Darrell Gorter[MSFT]

    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
    --------------------
    <Thread-Topic: 64-bit boot order
    <thread-index: AcWIrV6sbxjNA2khTVSM6HDFDAkFbQ==
    <X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 67.51.86.148
    <From: "=?Utf-8?B?SmFzb24=?=" <>
    <Subject: 64-bit boot order
    <Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:51:04 -0700
    <Lines: 6
    <Message-ID: <>
    <MIME-Version: 1.0
    <Content-Type: text/plain;
    < charset="Utf-8"
    <Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    <X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
    <Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
    <Importance: normal
    <Priority: normal
    <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
    <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
    <NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
    <Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
    <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:11104
    <X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
    <
    <I can't seem to find a list of the boot order or boot proces for 64-bit
    <machines. Has this changed? Is it still NTLDR-Boot.ini-Ntdetect.com----
    <ETC?
    <
    <Thanks!
    <Jason
    <
     
    Darrell Gorter[MSFT], Jul 14, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. ""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <> a écrit dans le
    message de news: ...
    > Hello Jason,
    > For X64 the boot order is the same as x86 so yes your response is correct.
    > Thanks,
    > Darrell Gorter[MSFT]


    And the NTLDR / NTDETECT.COM are the same version for Windows 2003 server
    32 bits and Windows X64.
    These NTLDR/NTDETECT.COM can start both 32 and 64 bits Windows
     
    Gilles Vollant \(MVP\), Jul 15, 2005
    #3
  4. Htllo Giles,
    The SP1 versions of those files should be the same and be able to load both
    platforms
    Earlier versions of Windows 2003 files would not be able to load 64-bit
    Thanks,
    Darrell Gorter[MSFT]

    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
    --------------------
    <From: "Gilles Vollant \(MVP\)" <>
    <References: <>
    <>
    <Subject: Re: 64-bit boot order
    <Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:04:24 +0200
    <Lines: 13
    <X-Priority: 3
    <X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    <X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830
    <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
    <X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
    <Message-ID: <>
    <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
    <NNTP-Posting-Host: vchatillon-1-82-227-40-131.fbx.proxad.net 82.227.40.131
    <Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
    <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:11208
    <X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
    <
    <
    <""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <> a écrit dans le
    <message de news: ...
    <> Hello Jason,
    <> For X64 the boot order is the same as x86 so yes your response is
    correct.
    <> Thanks,
    <> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
    <
    <And the NTLDR / NTDETECT.COM are the same version for Windows 2003 server
    <32 bits and Windows X64.
    <These NTLDR/NTDETECT.COM can start both 32 and 64 bits Windows
    <
    <
    <
     
    Darrell Gorter[MSFT], Jul 15, 2005
    #4
  5. THANKS GUYS!

    ""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" wrote:

    > Htllo Giles,
    > The SP1 versions of those files should be the same and be able to load both
    > platforms
    > Earlier versions of Windows 2003 files would not be able to load 64-bit
    > Thanks,
    > Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
    >
    > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
    > --------------------
    > <From: "Gilles Vollant \(MVP\)" <>
    > <References: <>
    > <>
    > <Subject: Re: 64-bit boot order
    > <Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:04:24 +0200
    > <Lines: 13
    > <X-Priority: 3
    > <X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    > <X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830
    > <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
    > <X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
    > <Message-ID: <>
    > <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
    > <NNTP-Posting-Host: vchatillon-1-82-227-40-131.fbx.proxad.net 82.227.40.131
    > <Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
    > <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:11208
    > <X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
    > <
    > <
    > <""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <> a écrit dans le
    > <message de news: ...
    > <> Hello Jason,
    > <> For X64 the boot order is the same as x86 so yes your response is
    > correct.
    > <> Thanks,
    > <> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
    > <
    > <And the NTLDR / NTDETECT.COM are the same version for Windows 2003 server
    > <32 bits and Windows X64.
    > <These NTLDR/NTDETECT.COM can start both 32 and 64 bits Windows
    > <
    > <
    > <
    >
    >
     
    =?Utf-8?B?SmFzb24=?=, Jul 15, 2005
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. =?Utf-8?B?U3RldmUxMDc3?=

    If you get an order # does it mean the order is accepted?

    =?Utf-8?B?U3RldmUxMDc3?=, May 12, 2005, in forum: Windows 64bit
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,082
    Spore
    May 13, 2005
  2. lbbss
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    4,795
  3. BP
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,160
    PhilSweet
    Dec 19, 2008
  4. Homer J. Simpson
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    787
    Jim Barry
    Jan 19, 2009
  5. David B.
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    518
    David B.
    Jan 20, 2009
Loading...

Share This Page