500 8 Reflex-Nikkor and Canon mirror lenses - 800/1:3.8, 2000/1:11, 5200/1:14

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Just D, Feb 21, 2007.

  1. Just D

    Just D Guest

    Does anybody have any experience with this one?

    500 8 Reflex-Nikkor.C

    http://images.google.com/imgres?img...r+Reflex+C+500&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1

    http://images.google.com/imgres?img...r+Reflex+C+500&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1

    http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=Nikkor Reflex 500

    I'm just wondering because it's pretty old and I didn't hear that this one
    even exists.

    Also found couple more interesting links.

    http://www.canonfd.com/mirrorlenses/index.html

    This brochure tells about Canon mirror lenses - 800/1:3.8, 2000/1:11,
    5200/1:14. Interesting monsters... Made for a special purpose? Never heard
    that we're having something like that now.

    Just D.
     
    Just D, Feb 21, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Just D

    Toby Guest

    "Just D" <> wrote in message
    news:wjOCh.296539$...
    > Does anybody have any experience with this one?
    >
    > 500 8 Reflex-Nikkor.C
    >
    > http://images.google.com/imgres?img...r+Reflex+C+500&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1
    >
    > http://images.google.com/imgres?img...r+Reflex+C+500&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1
    >
    > http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=Nikkor Reflex 500
    >
    > I'm just wondering because it's pretty old and I didn't hear that this one
    > even exists.
    >
    > Also found couple more interesting links.
    >
    > http://www.canonfd.com/mirrorlenses/index.html
    >
    > This brochure tells about Canon mirror lenses - 800/1:3.8, 2000/1:11,
    > 5200/1:14. Interesting monsters... Made for a special purpose? Never heard
    > that we're having something like that now.


    Apparently not. They were used for the '64 Olympics and could mount either
    Canon SLRs or TV cameras. Did you notice that the 5200mm lens weighed 100
    kg?

    Toby
     
    Toby, Feb 21, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Just D

    Just D Guest

    "Toby"
    >> http://www.canonfd.com/mirrorlenses/index.html
    >> This brochure tells about Canon mirror lenses - 800/1:3.8, 2000/1:11,
    >> 5200/1:14. Interesting monsters... Made for a special purpose? Never
    >> heard that we're having something like that now.


    > Apparently not. They were used for the '64 Olympics and could mount either
    > Canon SLRs or TV cameras. Did you notice that the 5200mm lens weighed 100
    > kg?


    But 100 kg... But 5200*1.5 for digital... But 100 kg... That's wow! All
    current lenses can just relax. :) I guess that mechanically they should be
    very primitive, I'm not even taking about "electronically", the number of
    lines per unit is rather significantly smaller, but these terrible
    numbers... I'm very impressed. Maybe it was not very bad for TV with its
    much lower requirements for the picture?

    Just D.
     
    Just D, Feb 21, 2007
    #3
  4. Just D

    Guest

    On Feb 20, 6:41 pm, "Just D" <> wrote:
    > Does anybody have any experience with this one?
    >
    > 500 8 Reflex-Nikkor.C
    >
    > http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photo...
    >
    > http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photo...
    >
    > http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=Nikkor Reflex 500
    >
    > I'm just wondering because it's pretty old and I didn't hear that this one
    > even exists.
    >
    > Also found couple more interesting links.
    >
    > http://www.canonfd.com/mirrorlenses/index.html
    >
    > This brochure tells about Canon mirror lenses - 800/1:3.8, 2000/1:11,
    > 5200/1:14. Interesting monsters... Made for a special purpose? Never heard
    > that we're having something like that now.
    >
    > Just D.



    I used to have one that I used on my F4. It made for a pretty
    reasonable (read: MUCH less expensive) alternative to a conventional
    500mm lens, and was also quite a bit lighter. But there are always
    trade-offs, and in this case the downside was that the lens sacrificed
    quite a bit of contrast. Whether that was by virtue of the cat design
    or just a case of less than optimal glass in mine, I don't know. But
    many of the pictures it produced were rather "blah" looking due to the
    low contrast, particularly those of more distant subjects (probably at
    least partially due to atmospheric haze).

    In any case I don't have it any more. I doubt that it would even
    mount on my D200 anyway.

    Jeff
     
    , Feb 21, 2007
    #4
  5. "Just D" <> wrote in message news:wjOCh.296539$...

    > Does anybody have any experience with this one?
    >
    > 500 8 Reflex-Nikkor.C


    It is listed at my www.donferrario.com/ruether/slemn.html
    (note the address change). There are two versions, the "C"
    is the earlier, larger one. I preferred that one, though the
    later compact one focused closer and was good at medium
    distances. The first version was good enough to perform well
    with the Nikon TC14/14B converters for a surprisingly good
    700mm (1050mm equivalent on digital) that is fairly light and
    compact - though it is a slow f11 (but in practice, even slower).
    --
    David Ruether

    www.donferrario.com/ruether/
    (note the address change)
     
    David Ruether, Feb 21, 2007
    #5
  6. Re: 500 8 Reflex-Nikkor and Canon mirror lenses - 800/1:3.8,

    "Toby" <> writes:

    > "Just D" <> wrote in message
    > news:wjOCh.296539$...


    >> This brochure tells about Canon mirror lenses - 800/1:3.8,
    >> 2000/1:11, 5200/1:14. Interesting monsters... Made for a special
    >> purpose? Never heard that we're having something like that now.


    > Apparently not. They were used for the '64 Olympics and could mount
    > either Canon SLRs or TV cameras. Did you notice that the 5200mm lens
    > weighed 100 kg?


    I think they are still current, but now only listed for TV use.
    ------------ And now a word from our sponsor ------------------
    Want to have instant messaging, and chat rooms, and discussion
    groups for your local users or business, you need dbabble!
    -- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_dbabble.htm ----
     
    Paul Repacholi, Feb 22, 2007
    #6
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. gavJ

    Nikon Coolpix 5200 Vs Canon Ixus 500 ???

    gavJ, Jan 8, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    331
  2. Jimmy G

    D7- and reflex Nikkor?

    Jimmy G, Jan 25, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    288
    Jimmy G
    Jan 26, 2005
  3. freightcar

    olympus sp-500 vs fujifilm s 5200

    freightcar, Oct 15, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    385
    ASAAR
    Oct 16, 2005
  4. Uncle Ron

    D100 and old 500mm Reflex Nikkor

    Uncle Ron, Oct 29, 2005, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    429
    Philip Homburg
    Oct 31, 2005
  5. Malcolm H
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    665
    Malcolm H
    Jan 31, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page