40" LCD TV's are out..

Discussion in 'NZ Computing' started by The GHOST of WOGER., Aug 5, 2004.

  1. Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
     
    The GHOST of WOGER., Aug 5, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. The GHOST of WOGER.

    Craig Shore Guest

    On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    <> wrote:

    >
    >
    >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..


    Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
     
    Craig Shore, Aug 5, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. In article <>,
    says...
    > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    > <> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..

    >
    > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    >
    >
    >

    What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)
     
    wogers nemesis, Aug 5, 2004
    #3
  4. The GHOST of WOGER.

    Craig Sutton Guest

    "The GHOST of WOGER." <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    >
    > Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    >

    Samsung also have a 32 inch widescreen out with built in DVR with 40 gig
    hd...
     
    Craig Sutton, Aug 5, 2004
    #4
  5. The GHOST of WOGER.

    John Guest

    "wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > In article <>,
    > says...
    > > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    > > <> wrote:
    > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..

    > >
    > > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    > >
    > >
    > >

    > What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)


    Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a decent
    backlight warranty.
     
    John, Aug 6, 2004
    #5
  6. On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +1200, "John" <> wrote:

    >
    >"wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    >news:...
    >> In article <>,
    >> says...
    >> > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    >> > <> wrote:
    >> >
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    >> >
    >> > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >

    >> What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)

    >
    >Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    >Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a decent
    >backlight warranty.
    >




    The back lights are now up to 30 years from what I have read, leaves a Plasma
    for dead..
     
    The GHOST of WOGER., Aug 6, 2004
    #6
  7. The GHOST of WOGER.

    Craig Shore Guest

    On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:09:52 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    <> wrote:

    >On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +1200, "John" <> wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>"wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    >>news:...
    >>> In article <>,
    >>> says...
    >>> > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    >>> > <> wrote:
    >>> >
    >>> > >
    >>> > >
    >>> > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    >>> >
    >>> > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    >>> >
    >>> >
    >>> >
    >>> What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)

    >>
    >>Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    >>Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a decent
    >>backlight warranty.
    >>

    >
    >
    >
    >The back lights are now up to 30 years from what I have read, leaves a Plasma
    >for dead..


    Plasma is still a lot nicer to look at.
     
    Craig Shore, Aug 6, 2004
    #7
  8. On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 19:57:02 +1200, Craig Shore <>
    wrote:

    >On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:09:52 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    ><> wrote:
    >
    >>On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +1200, "John" <> wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>>"wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    >>>news:...
    >>>> In article <>,
    >>>> says...
    >>>> > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    >>>> > <> wrote:
    >>>> >
    >>>> > >
    >>>> > >
    >>>> > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    >>>> >
    >>>> > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    >>>> >
    >>>> >
    >>>> >
    >>>> What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)
    >>>
    >>>Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    >>>Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a decent
    >>>backlight warranty.
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>The back lights are now up to 30 years from what I have read, leaves a Plasma
    >>for dead..

    >
    >Plasma is still a lot nicer to look at.



    Utter Rubish..

    Go look at a Philips 30" Pixel Plus LCD..
     
    The GHOST of WOGER., Aug 6, 2004
    #8
  9. The GHOST of WOGER.

    JohnO Guest

    "Craig Shore" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:09:52 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    > <> wrote:
    >
    > >On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +1200, "John" <>

    wrote:
    > >
    > >>
    > >>"wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    > >>news:...
    > >>> In article <>,
    > >>> says...
    > >>> > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    > >>> > <> wrote:
    > >>> >
    > >>> > >
    > >>> > >
    > >>> > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    > >>> >
    > >>> > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    > >>> >
    > >>> >
    > >>> >
    > >>> What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)
    > >>
    > >>Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    > >>Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a decent
    > >>backlight warranty.
    > >>

    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >The back lights are now up to 30 years from what I have read, leaves a

    Plasma
    > >for dead..

    >
    > Plasma is still a lot nicer to look at.


    I dunno - most of the plasmas I've looked at seem a bit fuzzy and the LCD's
    seem a lot sharper. The plasmas were 42" and the LCD's 32" though. I seem to
    keep hearing worrying anecdotes about he Plasma longevity though.
     
    JohnO, Aug 6, 2004
    #9
  10. The GHOST of WOGER.

    Craig Sutton Guest

    "JohnO" <> wrote in message
    news:zqIQc.9720$...
    >
    > "Craig Shore" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:09:52 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    > > <> wrote:
    > >
    > > >On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +1200, "John" <>

    > wrote:
    > > >
    > > >>
    > > >>"wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    > > >>news:...
    > > >>> In article <>,
    > > >>> says...
    > > >>> > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    > > >>> > <> wrote:
    > > >>> >
    > > >>> > >
    > > >>> > >
    > > >>> > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    > > >>> >
    > > >>> > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    > > >>> >
    > > >>> >
    > > >>> >
    > > >>> What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)
    > > >>
    > > >>Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    > > >>Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a

    decent
    > > >>backlight warranty.
    > > >>
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >The back lights are now up to 30 years from what I have read, leaves a

    > Plasma
    > > >for dead..

    > >
    > > Plasma is still a lot nicer to look at.

    >
    > I dunno - most of the plasmas I've looked at seem a bit fuzzy and the

    LCD's
    > seem a lot sharper. The plasmas were 42" and the LCD's 32" though. I seem

    to
    > keep hearing worrying anecdotes about he Plasma longevity though.
    >

    Common specs for a Plasma are 852x480 resolution..
     
    Craig Sutton, Aug 6, 2004
    #10
  11. The GHOST of WOGER.

    Pon Guest

    On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:23:01 +1200, "Craig Sutton"
    <> wrote:

    >
    >"JohnO" <> wrote in message
    >news:zqIQc.9720$...
    >>
    >> "Craig Shore" <> wrote in message
    >> news:...
    >> > On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:09:52 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    >> > <> wrote:
    >> >
    >> > >On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +1200, "John" <>

    >> wrote:
    >> > >
    >> > >>
    >> > >>"wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    >> > >>news:...
    >> > >>> In article <>,
    >> > >>> says...
    >> > >>> > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    >> > >>> > <> wrote:
    >> > >>> >
    >> > >>> > >
    >> > >>> > >
    >> > >>> > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    >> > >>> >
    >> > >>> > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    >> > >>> >
    >> > >>> >
    >> > >>> >
    >> > >>> What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)
    >> > >>
    >> > >>Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    >> > >>Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a

    >decent
    >> > >>backlight warranty.
    >> > >>
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > >The back lights are now up to 30 years from what I have read, leaves a

    >> Plasma
    >> > >for dead..
    >> >
    >> > Plasma is still a lot nicer to look at.

    >>
    >> I dunno - most of the plasmas I've looked at seem a bit fuzzy and the

    >LCD's
    >> seem a lot sharper. The plasmas were 42" and the LCD's 32" though. I seem

    >to
    >> keep hearing worrying anecdotes about he Plasma longevity though.
    >>

    >Common specs for a Plasma are 852x480 resolution..


    Whenever I see these things on show in, e.g., Harvey Normans, they
    always seem to be playing really bright colourful cartoons.
    Funny that ................
     
    Pon, Aug 6, 2004
    #11
  12. On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 23:03:14 +1200, Pon <> wrote:

    >On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:23:01 +1200, "Craig Sutton"
    ><> wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>"JohnO" <> wrote in message
    >>news:zqIQc.9720$...
    >>>
    >>> "Craig Shore" <> wrote in message
    >>> news:...
    >>> > On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:09:52 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    >>> > <> wrote:
    >>> >
    >>> > >On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +1200, "John" <>
    >>> wrote:
    >>> > >
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >>"wogers nemesis" <> wrote in message
    >>> > >>news:...
    >>> > >>> In article <>,
    >>> > >>> says...
    >>> > >>> > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:58:28 +1200, The GHOST of WOGER.
    >>> > >>> > <> wrote:
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> > >
    >>> > >>> > >
    >>> > >>> > >Samsung, saw one today all $17,000 worth..
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> > Does it have a dead pixel guarantee? :)
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> >
    >>> > >>> What? You are guaranteed to find a dead pixel? ;)
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >>Dead or Hot pixels on TVs aren't as noticable, but for me to buy a
    >>> > >>Samsung(Sony) LCD TV, it would need a Dead Pixel warranty, and a

    >>decent
    >>> > >>backlight warranty.
    >>> > >>
    >>> > >
    >>> > >
    >>> > >
    >>> > >The back lights are now up to 30 years from what I have read, leaves a
    >>> Plasma
    >>> > >for dead..
    >>> >
    >>> > Plasma is still a lot nicer to look at.
    >>>
    >>> I dunno - most of the plasmas I've looked at seem a bit fuzzy and the

    >>LCD's
    >>> seem a lot sharper. The plasmas were 42" and the LCD's 32" though. I seem

    >>to
    >>> keep hearing worrying anecdotes about he Plasma longevity though.
    >>>

    >>Common specs for a Plasma are 852x480 resolution..

    >
    >Whenever I see these things on show in, e.g., Harvey Normans, they
    >always seem to be playing really bright colourful cartoons.
    >Funny that ................




    These Plasma & LCD TV's are not to hot on pore signals as the show up the
    noise far better than a CRT TV, so you do need good reception to get the
    benefits from them..

    Seems that way also as the shops all seem to be playing a DVD with them, try
    them on a real Antenna source and see what they look like..
     
    The GHOST of WOGER., Aug 6, 2004
    #12
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. zxcvar
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    833
    zxcvar
    Dec 28, 2003
  2. Guy Scharf

    DSLR with flip-out LCD ?

    Guy Scharf, Feb 25, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    23
    Views:
    1,688
    Ray Fischer
    Mar 1, 2004
  3. Jason

    Canon powershot S1 LCD Vs Kodak DX6490 LCD??

    Jason, May 31, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    474
    Ron Baird
    Jun 7, 2004
  4. Andrew Christopher

    LCD Bulb Burned Out?

    Andrew Christopher, Jun 7, 2004, in forum: Digital Photography
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    2,436
    Tim Anderson
    Jun 8, 2004
  5. John
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    698
Loading...

Share This Page