3Com NBX v5000 Vs. NEC Elite IPK

Discussion in 'VOIP' started by Peter Parker, Mar 23, 2005.

  1. Peter Parker

    Peter Parker Guest

    Hello all,

    I've been researching a replacement for the company PBX phone system (an
    old Norstar system). I've come down to two choices. The 3Com NBX v5000
    (SuperStacker) and the NEC Elite IPK. I'm leaning towards the 3com, but
    I have a vendor that is particularly stubborn and keeps insisting the
    NEC is the better system for our needs. We currently have 80 phones and
    will be deploying that many with the new system. We have one location,
    but often have remote jobsite trailers that could take advantage of VoIP
    benefits. Future growth should be covered by both systems.

    Is there anyone out there that is familiar with either of these systems?
    I'd like to know what some of their shortcomings might be. The NEC guy
    tells me that the 3Com doesn't use true IP (SIP) technology, but
    proprietary Ethernet. From my understanding, for LAN operation, the 3Com
    works on a layer3 level (mac address) and is actually beneficial as it
    conserves IP addresses.

    Any information and opinions will be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,

    --
    Peter Parker
    Peter Parker, Mar 23, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Peter Parker

    Peter Parker Guest

    On 03/23/2005 1:42 PM, Peter Parker pondered briefly and then wrote:

    > Hello all,
    >
    > I've been researching a replacement for the company PBX phone system (an
    > old Norstar system). I've come down to two choices. The 3Com NBX v5000
    > (SuperStacker) and the NEC Elite IPK. I'm leaning towards the 3com, but
    > I have a vendor that is particularly stubborn and keeps insisting the
    > NEC is the better system for our needs. We currently have 80 phones and
    > will be deploying that many with the new system. We have one location,
    > but often have remote jobsite trailers that could take advantage of VoIP
    > benefits. Future growth should be covered by both systems.
    >
    > Is there anyone out there that is familiar with either of these systems?
    > I'd like to know what some of their shortcomings might be. The NEC guy
    > tells me that the 3Com doesn't use true IP (SIP) technology, but
    > proprietary Ethernet. From my understanding, for LAN operation, the 3Com
    > works on a layer3 level (mac address) and is actually beneficial as it
    > conserves IP addresses.
    >
    > Any information and opinions will be greatly appreciated.
    >
    > Thanks,


    No one has any thoughts or experience with either of these systems?

    --
    Peter Parker
    Peter Parker, Mar 25, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Peter Parker

    cpaetz Guest

    Look at the V3000

    Look at the NBX V3000 instead, has all the features of the V500
    except the fault tolerant hard drives and network ports. and it
    considerably cheaper

    NEC systems are not that great, I dont know a lot about them but I ru
    in to a lot of them that havnt lived up to their promises

    If your looking to deploy remote extensions you should also look at
    soft phone product called crystal voice, its an add on product fo
    the NBX which compresses the voice stream considerably. I've eve
    used it over dialup
    cpaetz, Apr 14, 2005
    #3
  4. Re: Look at the V3000

    On 04/13/2005 9:16 PM, cpaetz pondered briefly and then wrote:

    > Look at the NBX V3000 instead, has all the features of the V5000
    > except the fault tolerant hard drives and network ports. and its
    > considerably cheaper.
    >
    > NEC systems are not that great, I dont know a lot about them but I run
    > in to a lot of them that havnt lived up to their promises.
    >
    > If your looking to deploy remote extensions you should also look at a
    > soft phone product called crystal voice, its an add on product for
    > the NBX which compresses the voice stream considerably. I've even
    > used it over dialup.


    Thanks for the input. We went with the V5000 (without the fault
    tolerance) and will be deploying towards the end of the month. I'm
    excited to get the project going.

    I'll keep the 'Crystal Voice' in mind. We will eventually use remote
    extensions at job site locations and the like.

    Thanks again,
    --
    Steve (aka Peter Parker)
    http://www.soundclick.com/rockermann
    Steve M. Mann, Apr 14, 2005
    #4
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Phil J
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    540
    Phil J
    Nov 1, 2004
  2. Edmond

    3Com NBX + NAT DMZ

    Edmond, Jul 3, 2003, in forum: VOIP
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    2,989
    Edmond
    Jul 8, 2003
  3. bostonGuy

    3COM NBX pcXset over VPN

    bostonGuy, Jul 9, 2003, in forum: VOIP
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    3,921
    bostonGuy
    Jul 16, 2003
  4. bostonGuy

    H.323 gateways for 3COM NBX

    bostonGuy, Jul 16, 2003, in forum: VOIP
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,739
    Peter - QTelNet Inc.
    Jul 30, 2003
  5. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    749
Loading...

Share This Page