1000 BASE TX ??

Discussion in 'Cisco' started by inge network, Nov 15, 2003.

  1. inge network

    inge network Guest

    Hello,

    Is cate 6 is now normalized ?
    Is 1000 Base TX is ok now ?

    Why do we us still 1000 base T over cate 5e ?

    Thanks.
     
    inge network, Nov 15, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. inge network

    Steinar Haug Guest

    ["inge network"]

    | Why do we us still 1000 base T over cate 5e ?

    Because it works?

    Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting,
     
    Steinar Haug, Nov 15, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. inge network

    inge network Guest

    "Steinar Haug" <> a écrit dans le message de
    news:...
    > ["inge network"]
    >
    > | Why do we us still 1000 base T over cate 5e ?
    >
    > Because it works?


    Yes but, if we have to pass from cate 3 to another type ? What must we use
    ?
    cate 5e or 6 ?

    What is the future ?

    It is difficult to choose...because a cable is for 15 years.... $$

    >
    > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting,
     
    inge network, Nov 15, 2003
    #3
  4. On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:43:09 +0100, inge network wrote:
    >
    > "Steinar Haug" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > news:...
    >
    > Yes but, if we have to pass from cate 3 to another type ? What must we use ?
    > cate 5e or 6 ?
    >
    > What is the future ?
    >
    > It is difficult to choose...because a cable is for 15 years.... $$


    Use cat6, 1000baseT works fine over cat6 too.

    --
    Jesper Skriver, CCIE #5456, FreeBSD committer
     
    Jesper Skriver, Nov 15, 2003
    #4
  5. inge network

    inge network Guest

    "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    news:...
    > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:43:09 +0100, inge network wrote:
    > >
    > > "Steinar Haug" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > > news:...
    > >
    > > Yes but, if we have to pass from cate 3 to another type ? What must we

    use ?
    > > cate 5e or 6 ?
    > >
    > > What is the future ?
    > >
    > > It is difficult to choose...because a cable is for 15 years.... $$

    >
    > Use cat6, 1000baseT works fine over cat6 too.


    Ok,cool, thanks.
    And when Cisco will really implement 1000 base TX ?

    >
    > --
    > Jesper Skriver, CCIE #5456, FreeBSD committer
     
    inge network, Nov 15, 2003
    #5
  6. On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:31:02 +0100, inge network wrote:

    > "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > news:...
    >
    >> Use cat6, 1000baseT works fine over cat6 too.

    >
    > Ok,cool, thanks.
    >
    > And when Cisco will really implement 1000 base TX ?


    Everyone uses 1000basT, I don't see anything changing that, so I
    see 1000baseTX as a dead standard.

    /Jesper

    --
    Jesper Skriver, CCIE #5456, FreeBSD committer
     
    Jesper Skriver, Nov 15, 2003
    #6
  7. inge network

    inge network Guest

    "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    news:...
    > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:31:02 +0100, inge network wrote:
    >
    > > "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > > news:...
    > >
    > >> Use cat6, 1000baseT works fine over cat6 too.

    > >
    > > Ok,cool, thanks.
    > >
    > > And when Cisco will really implement 1000 base TX ?

    >
    > Everyone uses 1000basT, I don't see anything changing that, so I
    > see 1000baseTX as a dead standard.


    Ok, what about new server cards hp,dell etc... ?
    It's hard to obtain information on the road map. T vs TX

    > /Jesper
    >
    > --
    > Jesper Skriver, CCIE #5456, FreeBSD committer
     
    inge network, Nov 15, 2003
    #7
  8. On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:03:46 +0100, inge network wrote:
    >
    > "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > news:...
    >> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:31:02 +0100, inge network wrote:
    >>
    >> > "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    >> > news:...
    >> >
    >> >> Use cat6, 1000baseT works fine over cat6 too.
    >> >
    >> > Ok,cool, thanks.
    >> >
    >> > And when Cisco will really implement 1000 base TX ?

    >>
    >> Everyone uses 1000baseT, I don't see anything changing that, so I
    >> see 1000baseTX as a dead standard.

    >
    > Ok, what about new server cards hp,dell etc... ?
    > It's hard to obtain information on the road map. T vs TX


    All gigabit over copper NIC's I've seen are 1000baseT.

    As I said above "Everyone uses 1000baseT"

    --
    Jesper Skriver, CCIE #5456, FreeBSD committer
     
    Jesper Skriver, Nov 15, 2003
    #8
  9. inge network

    inge network Guest

    "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    news:...
    > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:03:46 +0100, inge network wrote:
    > >
    > > "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > > news:...
    > >> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:31:02 +0100, inge network wrote:
    > >>
    > >> > "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > >> > news:...
    > >> >
    > >> >> Use cat6, 1000baseT works fine over cat6 too.
    > >> >
    > >> > Ok,cool, thanks.
    > >> >
    > >> > And when Cisco will really implement 1000 base TX ?
    > >>
    > >> Everyone uses 1000baseT, I don't see anything changing that, so I
    > >> see 1000baseTX as a dead standard.

    > >
    > > Ok, what about new server cards hp,dell etc... ?
    > > It's hard to obtain information on the road map. T vs TX

    >
    > All gigabit over copper NIC's I've seen are 1000baseT.


    The nec 120Rf-2 140Rb-4 140Rc-4 ...on nec site, France.
    it is written 1000 base TX.
    I will phone the commercial to have precisions...

    > As I said above "Everyone uses 1000baseT"


    Us too, but I ask me some questions when I read above nec specs servers ?
    >
    > --
    > Jesper Skriver, CCIE #5456, FreeBSD committer
     
    inge network, Nov 15, 2003
    #9
  10. inge network

    Andre Beck Guest

    "inge network" <> writes:
    > "Jesper Skriver" <> a écrit dans le message de
    > >
    > > All gigabit over copper NIC's I've seen are 1000baseT.

    >
    > The nec 120Rf-2 140Rb-4 140Rc-4 ...on nec site, France.
    > it is written 1000 base TX.
    > I will phone the commercial to have precisions...


    This is much likely a typo. There is absolutely no need for another
    standard for 1000Base over twisted pair copper, especially now that
    1000BaseT is settled for some years and the chips are cheap like hell.
    The only potential argument would be those poor guys who let themselfes
    get half a twisted pair installation instead of a complete one. But
    actually, if they just get 2 pairs to each outlet, does anybody expect
    those to be better than Cat5?

    > > As I said above "Everyone uses 1000baseT"

    >
    > Us too, but I ask me some questions when I read above nec specs servers ?


    Do you always get the X right when talking about 10BaseT vs. 100BaseTX
    vs. 1000BaseT? And those are sallies, after all. 1000BaseTX is a bad
    meme distributed by some vendor who didn't get 1000BaseT right, often
    intensified by odd rumours about 1000BaseT "not achieving full 1000Base
    performance". Classifies as vaporware, if you ask me.

    --
    The _S_anta _C_laus _O_peration
    or "how to turn a complete illusion into a neverending money source"

    -> Andre "ABPSoft" Beck +++ ABP-RIPE +++ Dresden, Germany, Spacetime <-
     
    Andre Beck, Nov 16, 2003
    #10
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. =?Utf-8?B?QnJpYW4=?=

    Cannot update the mocrosoft Base Station mn-700

    =?Utf-8?B?QnJpYW4=?=, Jul 30, 2004, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    2,286
    Dave Puhrmann [MSFT]
    Aug 3, 2004
  2. =?Utf-8?B?c2FyYWg=?=

    Base Station Password

    =?Utf-8?B?c2FyYWg=?=, Jul 31, 2004, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    2,389
    SBrown
    Aug 2, 2004
  3. Barb Bowman [MVP-Windows]

    Re: MN-500 Wireless Base Station and MN-510 Wireless Adapter

    Barb Bowman [MVP-Windows], Aug 4, 2004, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    2,020
    Barb Bowman [MVP-Windows]
    Aug 4, 2004
  4. =?Utf-8?B?c25hcHNob3Q=?=

    base station management tool

    =?Utf-8?B?c25hcHNob3Q=?=, Sep 6, 2004, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    5,112
    Bryan Martin
    Sep 6, 2004
  5. =?Utf-8?B?c3dyaWxleQ==?=

    MN-500 to MN-700 base station problems

    =?Utf-8?B?c3dyaWxleQ==?=, Sep 24, 2004, in forum: Wireless Networking
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    2,502
    =?Utf-8?B?c3dyaWxleQ==?=
    Sep 26, 2004
Loading...

Share This Page