Computer Support
Computer Information
Computer Security
Windows 64bit
Wireless Networking
UK VOIP
VOIP
Digital Photography
DVD Video
Firefox
Cisco
Microsoft Certification
MCSE
MCSD
MCAD
MCDST
MCSA
MCITP
MCTS
A+ Certification
NZ Computing
C Programming
Python
C++
Java
HTML
XML
DotNet
VHDL
PERL

Sitemap


Spire VertiCool II and DiamondCool II Spire VertiCool II and DiamondCool II
Silverstrand
06-26-2006




Testing






As we can see, both coolers performed better than the stock cooler. However, the VertiCool II pulled ahead of the DiamondCool II. I found this interesting, as I had initially thought that the DiamondCool II would be the better of the two. Why is this not the case? I think that the reason is surface area. Heatsink performance depends on, among other things, surface area. While the VertiCool II had a fair amount of surface area, the DiamondCool II had... well, less. Going along with this idea, having heatpipes that attach to the base and bottom of the fins, and then curve slightly and go back into the fins doesn't provide much extra surface area either.

Regardless, both units run cooler than the stock equipment while producing less noise, which is something that we can all respect. But in the end, the VertiCool II is the better performer, and thus, the better cooler.




<<  <    Next Page: Conclusion (Page 4 of 5 )    >  >>






© http://www.velocityreviews.com 2003-2005 All Rights Reserved



SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46