Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Firefox > Tiger-trap-friendly secnews for limbo-ed 'users'?

Reply
Thread Tools

Tiger-trap-friendly secnews for limbo-ed 'users'?

 
 
Splibbilla
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-15-2004
I just landed in netscape.mozilla.general, and read in the (my) second thread:
---
Peter L[snip]

This is a *developer* newsgroup. For end-user discussion and peer support please go to:
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.general
-----

ok. And when moz groups are listed on websites, they recommend
netscape.mozilla.user.general
But ... that name too closely resembles the simpler
netscape.mozilla.general

A different aspect of the situation is also described here:
-----
http://www.moztips.com/index.php?id=18
Performing a search on Google for Mozilla (as explained above) will probably lead you to developer newsgroups.

Since there have been many messages posted to the developer newsgroups since Mozilla 1.0, new user newsgroups have been
set up.

If you are new to Mozilla, it is recommended you visit the user newsgroups. Unfortunately, the user newsgroups are not
accessible via Google, so you will have to use Mozilla Messenger (Mail and Newsgroups) to access them (from the Window
menu). By clicking on the links below, and restarting Mozilla thereafter, you should find these user newsgroups accessible in
Mozilla Messenger.
-----
I could go on... adding more reasons & attempts showing why the newbie is almost certain to land in one of the non .user.
netscape groups

-----
And I see many usenet posts (via Google) that suggest there is a stubborn problem here. The stubborness reminds me of a kid
who keeps hitting his thumb while trying to use a brick as hammer.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sn...49jk1%40ripley.
netscape.com&rnum=1

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ev=/groups%3Fs
ourceid%3Dmozclient%26ie%3Dutf-8%26oe%3Dutf-
8%26q%3Dsnews%2B%257C%2Bsecnews%2B563%2Bport%2B%2B alt.mozilla%2B

But I hypothesize that netscape doesn't want to host newbie threads. (Of course, hosting costs money. MS can afford to host
..public. newgroups, tho true usenet groups for MS products also do well) Somehow netscape has got to clearly deflect civilians
to the shared (? open hierarchy? True usenet?) groups such as alt.Mozilla. (cast out the newbies! The lions are hungry! etc.)





meh, meh, meh

Computer people should "interface" with the public (not the .public.) using plain English if computer people don't want to be
pestered by plain language speakers.

If 'someone' wants civilians to adopt Mozilla, 'someone' will better succeed when using civilian-friendly communication
methods.



--
....like Candlewax Castles made of Poi Jell-O
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Leonidas Jones
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-16-2004
Splibbilla wrote:
> I just landed in netscape.mozilla.general, and read in the (my) second thread:
> ---
> Peter L[snip]
>
> This is a *developer* newsgroup. For end-user discussion and peer support please go to:
> snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.general
> -----
>
> ok. And when moz groups are listed on websites, they recommend
> netscape.mozilla.user.general
> But ... that name too closely resembles the simpler
> netscape.mozilla.general
>
> A different aspect of the situation is also described here:
> -----
> http://www.moztips.com/index.php?id=18
> Performing a search on Google for Mozilla (as explained above) will probably lead you to developer newsgroups.
>
> Since there have been many messages posted to the developer newsgroups since Mozilla 1.0, new user newsgroups have been
> set up.
>
> If you are new to Mozilla, it is recommended you visit the user newsgroups. Unfortunately, the user newsgroups are not
> accessible via Google, so you will have to use Mozilla Messenger (Mail and Newsgroups) to access them (from the Window
> menu). By clicking on the links below, and restarting Mozilla thereafter, you should find these user newsgroups accessible in
> Mozilla Messenger.
> -----
> I could go on... adding more reasons & attempts showing why the newbie is almost certain to land in one of the non .user.
> netscape groups
>
> -----
> And I see many usenet posts (via Google) that suggest there is a stubborn problem here. The stubborness reminds me of a kid
> who keeps hitting his thumb while trying to use a brick as hammer.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sn...49jk1%40ripley.
> netscape.com&rnum=1
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ev=/groups%3Fs
> ourceid%3Dmozclient%26ie%3Dutf-8%26oe%3Dutf-
> 8%26q%3Dsnews%2B%257C%2Bsecnews%2B563%2Bport%2B%2B alt.mozilla%2B
>
> But I hypothesize that netscape doesn't want to host newbie threads. (Of course, hosting costs money. MS can afford to host
> .public. newgroups, tho true usenet groups for MS products also do well) Somehow netscape has got to clearly deflect civilians
> to the shared (? open hierarchy? True usenet?) groups such as alt.Mozilla. (cast out the newbies! The lions are hungry! etc.)
>
>
>
>
>
> meh, meh, meh
>
> Computer people should "interface" with the public (not the .public.) using plain English if computer people don't want to be
> pestered by plain language speakers.
>
> If 'someone' wants civilians to adopt Mozilla, 'someone' will better succeed when using civilian-friendly communication
> methods.
>
>
>


I don't really know where you are going with this. We (Mozilla
Champions) did not set up the groups, nor did we name them. We just
work within the framwork we are given.

If anyone is having difficulty accessing these groups:


snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.win32
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.mac
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.unix
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.general
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.firebird
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.thunderbird
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.netscape7.windows

Just sing out and I'll lend a hand.

For what its worth, there is a bug out on this, and a plan to reorganize
both the developer and user gorups. The wait is for someone to
volunteer as server admin.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239931

Lee
--
Leonidas Jones, Mozilla Champion

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Tiger-trap-friendly secnews for limbo-ed 'users'? Splibbilla Firefox 0 11-15-2004 01:51 AM
Secnews.Netscape IDP Computer Support 1 11-07-2003 04:14 PM



Advertisments