Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Re: [SI] Steeples - What hasn't made the cut

Thread Tools

Re: [SI] Steeples - What hasn't made the cut

Posts: n/a
On 1/31/2013 7:22 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
> I've already explained that there are few worthwhile steeples within
> gunshot of where I live and that I am in any case presently restricted
> in my movements. Instead I've gone to recent archives to extract
> photographs of steeples and the like.
> All the photographs were taken under tourist conditions: no control of
> the site, the distance, the nature or direction of the light, or the
> weather in general. A good photograph is one without a stray head in
> it.
> One of my problems is I tend to value content as much the technical
> aspects. A technically lousy photograph of an interesting steeple
> still ranks highly in my general opinion. I know that not everyone
> holds that view (sigh). Anyway, I had to make a decision and the best
> way seemed to be put up the ones which didn't make the cut, thereby
> committing myself by implication to those that did make the cut.
> Here are two from Copenhagen:
> is the
> extraordinary spire of "Vor Frelsers Kirke" in Copenhagen. There is a
> stairway to the top of the spire but it runs up the outside! I met
> someone who has climbed it and he said once you get up a bit it feels
> much safer if you go up backwards on the seat of your trousers.
> is the spire of St
> Nikolaj Kirke. Just look at all that copper. The mounted gentleman is
> the bishop. The speckled texture is due to overdoing it with DxO. I
> can now do better.
> St Petersberg now:
> are the 'spires' of
> the family chapel on Queen Catherine's Palace. They told us "If it
> looks like gold, it probably is gold".
> helps put things
> into perspective. You can see about half the servant's quarters to the
> left of the chapel and less than half of the palace-proper to the
> right of the chapel. You can only photograph the whole of this from
> the air.
> is the "Peter and
> Paul" Cathedral. The tower is 404' high and very difficult to
> photograph from any accessible site on the ground. The murk was due to
> the hot muggy atmosphere - 36C + high humidity I think it was that
> day.
> These photographs are interesting but I don't think any of them are of
> real merit.

OK They are decent "I've been there," shots. Now get your imagination
juices flowing, and create.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Steeples - where Steeples? Tony Cooper Digital Photography 0 02-09-2013 05:12 AM
Re: [SI] Steeples - What hasn't made the cut PeterN Digital Photography 6 02-09-2013 03:10 AM
Steeples? Tony Cooper Digital Photography 26 02-08-2013 05:00 PM
Re: [SI] Steeples - What hasn't made the cut Tony Cooper Digital Photography 0 02-01-2013 04:07 AM
Re: [SI] Steeples - What hasn't made the cut Peter Jason Digital Photography 0 02-01-2013 12:28 AM