On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:01:42 -0800 (PST), RichA <> wrote:
: On Jan 30, 4:31*pm, "David Hare-Scott" <sec...@nospam.com> wrote:
: > PeterN wrote:
: > > On 1/30/2013 12:40 AM, RichA wrote:
: > >>
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-21234214
: >
: > > Very interesting work.
: > > It is ironic that the photo realists strive to make there non=photo
: > > work look like a photograph. And many photo artists strive to make
: > > their photos look like paintings, or pencil sketches.
: >
: > I would be interested to know if the artist works from photographs. *I have
: > looked about but other than the materials used and some step-by-step images
: > showing drawings in progress I cannot find anything saying just how he
: > works.
: >
: > In some cases the image seems to show the perspective effects that you get
: > from using various focal length lenses. *For example, one portrait shows the
: > "big nose" effect of a face taken with a wide(ish) lens held close to the
: > subject but many show the slightly flat effect of a short telephoto a
: > distance back.
: >
: > If he does work from photos his work is remarkable enough, if he doesn't it
: > is even more so but then the question would be; if he has such command of
: > lighting and perspective why imitate that of the camera?
:
: Because we have enough abstract art from untalented people to last
: forever?
Amen.
Bob