Somewhere on teh intarwebs Peter Huebner wrote:
> In article <kdpqj1$oid$>,
> says...
[snip]
> We replaced it with a Miele "Cat & Dog" vacuum cleaner, and that one
> is simply superb. (not bagless) I can run it aroud the house for an
> hour and no sneezing nor swollen eyes.
That's great Peter! Would you come and do the same for me?
LOL, I can (mulch) mow the lawn (I have a very good, commercial-grade mower)
without *too* much trouble if I save a morphine pill for the two days
previously. It's sore while I do it but then, when I've had a cool shower
and run water on my back I'm not so bad.
However vacuuming the carpets is another matter entirely. For a start I've
never seen a vacuum cleaner with a long enough 'wand'. (I'm not that tall
but can't bend forward at the waist too much.) Unlike mowing lawns I find
that I have to really lean into the cleaning and apply quite a lot of
pressure at the vacuum head to open the 'pile' of the carpet enough to get
it properly clean. (I say 'pile' as the carpets in this rental aren't
exactly shag-pile. <g>) The end result of this is usually two+ days of
having to grab the opposite side of the mattress to turn over in bed in the
mornings (that's just the start of the hellacious day!).
The last time I vacuumed it was four days and the extreme pain had graduated
to the 'agony' category. I couldn't do much of anything for over
half-a-week. Consequently I haven't vacuumed since (which means this year)
and I hate it!
To answer your enquiry about makes and models of vacuum I originally (back
in ~2002 or so) bought a cheap-ish Nilfisk (~$350) as I liked the idea - It
had a small vortex filter[*] towards the top of the wand that you could
easilly see and empty before it got too full and the detritus went into the
bag. (Of course the lighter dust still goes into the bag but, with this
system you can get 10 x the use out of a bag.)
However the design was flawed. Two units burned out within the first couple
of weeks of use (I wasn't so sore then). After taking the second one back
the store got a rep to come out and he said that they were getting roughly
25% of them back. The outlet of the vortex had a mesh with about 10 threads
to the millimeter and it was too restrictive - the motors overheated.
In the end I upgraded to a Nilfisk King priced at ~$700 (this was a reduced
price, taking into account the hassle I'd been through!) which, because I
bought it on HP over three years and at the time didn't have contents
insurance anded up costing me over $1.2K! Lesson learned, no more HP (unless
it has a 'no-interest' period and I can pay it off in that time) and I now
have contents insurance.
However, when the second of the cheaper ones blew it's top I only took the
motor part into the shop - I was sick of lugging all the pipes etc. I told
the Nilfisk rep I'd drop them off next time I was in town and he said not to
worry about it.
After using the King for a couple months and paying through the nose for the
bags I modified the vortex-on-wand system to fit - removing the fine mesh
and just relying on centrepital force to keep most of the 'dust' out of the
bag. It works reasonably well, the bags last more than 5 x longer than they
used to.
[*] I like vortex filters - having designed and built them into quite a few
large-scale 'aquarium' systems in the early 90s. It's great to just open a
valve and there goes 90% of the rubbish into a bucket - instead of having to
endlessly squeeze sponges to clean them out.
I have a meeting with W&I coming up in a week or so to re-assess my
eligibility for the 'special benefit' (read: reduce it even further) so I'll
raise the issue of getting a house-cleaner in for an hour a week minimum to
vacuum my carpets as I simply can't do it any more.

We won't even talk
about the black mould on the walls and ceilings of the 'wet areas' of the
house that I can no longer clean off! :-/
--
/Shaun.
"Humans will have advanced a long, long, way when religious belief has a
cozy little classification in the DSM."
David Melville (in r.a.s.f1)