«

On 1/5/2013 6:17 PM, Savageduck wrote:
> On 2012-12-31 01:36:19 -0800, Eric Stevens <> said:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:40:50 -0800, Savageduck
>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-12-30 19:58:14 -0800, Robert Coe <> said:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:22:19 -0500, Tony Cooper
>>>> <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> : I've lost track of when the SI "Street" submissions are due. I just
>>>> : sent mine in, but really don't know if I've sent them to the right
>>>> : address. I used the Rulz page link.
>>>> :
>>>> : What's going on?
>>>>
>>>> The Maximum Leader's last pronouncement was that they're due on the
>>>> 6th. Good
>>>> thing too; I'm not ready yet.
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>
>>> No kidding.
>>> I am going go on the hunt soon, or I am going to have to go to the
>>> archives.
>>
>> Archives are frowned on according to the RULZ.
>
> Well I managed to get three shots which should work for this mandate.
> So here is one of the archive shots from October 2012 I had considered.
> < https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/Fil...C_5312-E-2.jpg >
>
>

BTW what is "red.photo.digital"?

--
PeterN

On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:39:16 -0800, Savageduck
<savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

>>
>> BTW what is "red.photo.digital"?
>
>I suspect that is a Tony Cooper typo. I just noticed that myself and
>checked his OP.

What? You don't follow red.photo.digital? You don't know what you're
missing. There are no arguments or flame wars on red.photo.digital.
Floyd and nospam never post there. People treat other people with
respect.

Newbies never post without thoroughly researching their question
first. When they do post, the provide all of the relevant information
needed to answer their question. They always thank you.

Post a link to a photo and you get a good critique complimenting what
you did right and pointing out how the image could be improved. No
one who never links to their own images is allowed to comment on other
people's images.




--
Tony Cooper, Orlando FL

On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:59:46 -0500, Tony Cooper <>
wrote:
: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:39:16 -0800, Savageduck
: <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
:
: >>
: >> BTW what is "red.photo.digital"?
: >
: >I suspect that is a Tony Cooper typo. I just noticed that myself and
: >checked his OP.
:
: What? You don't follow red.photo.digital? You don't know what you're
: missing. There are no arguments or flame wars on red.photo.digital.
: Floyd and nospam never post there. People treat other people with
: respect.
:
: Newbies never post without thoroughly researching their question
: first. When they do post, the provide all of the relevant information
: needed to answer their question. They always thank you.
:
: Post a link to a photo and you get a good critique complimenting what
: you did right and pointing out how the image could be improved. No
: one who never links to their own images is allowed to comment on other
: people's images.

But the discussion is confined exclusively to IR, is it not?

Bob