On 1/10/2013 4:46 AM, AD wrote:
> On Dec 4 2012, 9:01 am, Rob <mesam...@google.com> wrote:
>> On 4/12/2012 5:29 PM, AD wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Wife wants my mbp13" for photo edits, low res (768 by 13xx)
>>> notwithstanding.
>>
>>> Not willing to part with that hardware I'm thinking a decent IPS
>>> monitor for my win XP PC.
>>
>>> Thoughts and options for the monitor.
>>
>>> Must be height adjustable. Must be glare free. Must have a solid base.
>>> Must not have brave new world design.
>>> Must have at least 1200 vertical resolution
>>
>>> I think the color fidelity requirement rules out all TN panels. No?
>>
>>> bonus points if it still can play video without much distortion but is
>>> not a hard requirement
>>> bonus points if it's tilt adjustable
>>
>>> I _AM_ on the budget :^)
>>
>>> all opinions are welcome
>>
>> Difficult to get 1200V now days usually 1080 for budget screens upto
>> say 24". Monitors that are both height and tilt also difficult to find
>> in the budget price range. Mostly just tilt.
>>
>> I use a Samsung 24" 1920x1200 find it a good screen although a few years
>> old now - but its sort of calibrated to suit my printing.
>>
>> Have you looked at pricing a TV for your monitor.
>
> No. I was assuming they all max out at 1080 vertical.
> should I widen the search to include TV?
>
I know some who use a TV. I looked, but made the decision to go for an NEC
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist.jsp&sku=689882&A=cart&is=REG&q= 1&Q=add>
Read the specs for why.
--
PeterN
|