"Gary Eickmeier" <> wrote:
>But a miracle has happened in the amateur realm. For a while now,
>professionals have been in competition with Uncle Harry with his big DSLR at
>weddings. He is always there, and shooting all of your poses and making his
>own wedding album and taking people's time and attention away from you.
>
>Well, miracle of miracles, nowadays they are all shooting everything with
>their phones! No more competition on image quality at least. And the people
>will pay a lot less attention to the amateur with the phone than the
>interloper with the Nikon. Hallelulia!
That's wishful thinking. A pro wedding shooter is just as likely to
find that one or more of the wedding guests have 'better' DSLRs than
he/she does.
On one hand, many working photographers don't generate enough income
from photography to buy the latest equipment, instead having to make
do with items that are anything up to 3 years old. On the other hand,
amateurs with disposable incomes higher than a working photographer
could dream of can easily buy the latest DSLR and lenses.
What saves the pro shooter is that very few amateurs have the faintest
idea how to shoot good images, something that is confirmed here on a
regular, monthly basis by the entries to the Shoot-In.
|