| where a file is *does not matter*.
Interesting follow-up to this issue. The megaupload case:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/1...loud-computing
"The government maintains that Mr. Goodwin lost his
property rights in his data by storing it on a cloud
computing service."
On the bright side, this case could shed some light on
the legal status of cloud files and perhaps result in clearer
definitions. But for now, the US gov't claims the right to
access and/or impound any such data they like with only
the flimsiest of excuses. There seem to be a number of
entities with a vested interest in setting a precedent of
defining online data as part of a host-owned service.
Ironically, a common excuse for such a claim was an older
law that said email left on the server could be considered
abandoned, and that the host could therefore delete it, after
a given period of time. (6 months maybe? I don't remember
exactly.) The idea was to relieve web hosts of outdated
data taking up expensive server space. But now the webmail
services keep email even after a person has "deleted" it on
the server. So in a sense, to use cloud services is to offer a
copy of all documents to the gov't, and possibly to marketers,
while endangering one's own access.
| the reality is that many users are very confused
| with file managers.
Yes, and many are not. I know people who can't live without
Picassa and I know people who organize their photos and docs
into folders and regularly back them up to CD. Just because
you don't know how to use a tool that's not a reason to assume
the tool has no use.