Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Re: HDR

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: HDR

 
 
PeterN
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-29-2012
On 10/28/2012 9:20 PM, Savageduck wrote:
> On 2012-10-28 17:08:15 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)> said:
>
>> On 10/28/2012 7:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>> On 2012-10-28 16:31:00 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> On 10/28/2012 6:26 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>> On 2012-10-28 15:07:26 -0700, tony cooper <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>>> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:22:32 -0400, PeterN
>>>>>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess I just don't have your vision for the abstract.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can live w/o the sarcasm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you call this an abstract?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/d41dtjxr18...-10-26-861.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I took this photograph of these Cirque du Soleil clowns, applied a
>>>>>> radial blur, and used a mask to reveal only the one clown unblurred.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would, and I like it.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...and it is a great use of the tools you had available to put your
>>>>> interpretation on your very good capture.
>>>>>
>>>>> I some how doubt that if Peter had just applied his "small curves
>>>>> adjustment" that the result would have been as successful or
>>>>> pleasing to
>>>>> the eye..
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I I had shot that image, and I wish I had, I would have done something
>>>> other than make a small curve adjustment. I cannot say what I would
>>>> do, because that varies withe every image, and what I feel like doing
>>>> to it. I don't believe you are implying that I do everything by
>>>> formula.
>>>
>>> OK! OK! I just didn't like what you did with my particular image. I was
>>> kind of disturbed to see what you had done with it. I guess I had
>>> different expectations to that which you presented.
>>>
>>>

>>
>> Which was my original thought when you expressed extensive disdain for
>> my small adjustments.
>> Of course you were right when you pointed out that I destroyed the
>> shadow detail. i think your original image is flat and needs some
>> enhancement. HDR is overkill.
>> I think my crop in the second image makes your image into a truck in a
>> location, rather than a location with a truck.

>
> A "TRUCK"? Did you not discern a tractor somewhere in that image?
>
> This is a truck;
> < https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/Fil.../DNC0806_w.jpg >
>


Durn spel chekker.

--
Peter
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
PeterN
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-31-2012
On 10/28/2012 10:19 PM, Savageduck wrote:
> On 2012-10-28 18:47:29 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)> said:
>
>> On 10/28/2012 9:20 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>> On 2012-10-28 17:08:15 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> On 10/28/2012 7:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>> On 2012-10-28 16:31:00 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>>> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/28/2012 6:26 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2012-10-28 15:07:26 -0700, tony cooper <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:22:32 -0400, PeterN
>>>>>>>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess I just don't have your vision for the abstract.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can live w/o the sarcasm.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would you call this an abstract?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/d41dtjxr18...-10-26-861.jpg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I took this photograph of these Cirque du Soleil clowns, applied a
>>>>>>>> radial blur, and used a mask to reveal only the one clown
>>>>>>>> unblurred.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would, and I like it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...and it is a great use of the tools you had available to put your
>>>>>>> interpretation on your very good capture.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I some how doubt that if Peter had just applied his "small curves
>>>>>>> adjustment" that the result would have been as successful or
>>>>>>> pleasing to
>>>>>>> the eye..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I I had shot that image, and I wish I had, I would have done
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> other than make a small curve adjustment. I cannot say what I would
>>>>>> do, because that varies withe every image, and what I feel like doing
>>>>>> to it. I don't believe you are implying that I do everything by
>>>>>> formula.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK! OK! I just didn't like what you did with my particular image. I
>>>>> was
>>>>> kind of disturbed to see what you had done with it. I guess I had
>>>>> different expectations to that which you presented.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which was my original thought when you expressed extensive disdain for
>>>> my small adjustments.
>>>> Of course you were right when you pointed out that I destroyed the
>>>> shadow detail. i think your original image is flat and needs some
>>>> enhancement. HDR is overkill.
>>>> I think my crop in the second image makes your image into a truck in a
>>>> location, rather than a location with a truck.
>>>
>>> A "TRUCK"? Did you not discern a tractor somewhere in that image?
>>>
>>> This is a truck;
>>> < https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/Fil.../DNC0806_w.jpg >
>>>

>>
>> Durn spel chekker.

>
> I would have blamed Sandy.
>


I blame Sandy for no power. We still don't know when it will come back on.

Right now the library is open, but crowded. It took half an hour to
connect to the WiFi here.
Tomorrow its Starbucks.

--
Peter
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
PeterN
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-01-2012
On 10/31/2012 5:33 PM, Savageduck wrote:
> On 2012-10-31 12:47:25 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)> said:
>
>> On 10/28/2012 10:19 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>> On 2012-10-28 18:47:29 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> On 10/28/2012 9:20 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>> On 2012-10-28 17:08:15 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>>> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/28/2012 7:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2012-10-28 16:31:00 -0700, PeterN <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/28/2012 6:26 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2012-10-28 15:07:26 -0700, tony cooper
>>>>>>>>> <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:22:32 -0400, PeterN
>>>>>>>>>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I just don't have your vision for the abstract.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can live w/o the sarcasm.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you call this an abstract?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/d41dtjxr18...-10-26-861.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I took this photograph of these Cirque du Soleil clowns,
>>>>>>>>>> applied a
>>>>>>>>>> radial blur, and used a mask to reveal only the one clown
>>>>>>>>>> unblurred.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would, and I like it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...and it is a great use of the tools you had available to put
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> interpretation on your very good capture.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I some how doubt that if Peter had just applied his "small curves
>>>>>>>>> adjustment" that the result would have been as successful or
>>>>>>>>> pleasing to
>>>>>>>>> the eye..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I I had shot that image, and I wish I had, I would have done
>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>> other than make a small curve adjustment. I cannot say what I would
>>>>>>>> do, because that varies withe every image, and what I feel like
>>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>> to it. I don't believe you are implying that I do everything by
>>>>>>>> formula.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK! OK! I just didn't like what you did with my particular image. I
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> kind of disturbed to see what you had done with it. I guess I had
>>>>>>> different expectations to that which you presented.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which was my original thought when you expressed extensive disdain
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> my small adjustments.
>>>>>> Of course you were right when you pointed out that I destroyed the
>>>>>> shadow detail. i think your original image is flat and needs some
>>>>>> enhancement. HDR is overkill.
>>>>>> I think my crop in the second image makes your image into a truck
>>>>>> in a
>>>>>> location, rather than a location with a truck.
>>>>>
>>>>> A "TRUCK"? Did you not discern a tractor somewhere in that image?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a truck;
>>>>> < https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/Fil.../DNC0806_w.jpg >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Durn spel chekker.
>>>
>>> I would have blamed Sandy.
>>>

>>
>> I blame Sandy for no power. We still don't know when it will come back
>> on.
>>
>> Right now the library is open, but crowded. It took half an hour to
>> connect to the WiFi here.
>> Tomorrow its Starbucks.

>
> So i was right!
> At least you guys are safe. I understand the power issues are one of the
> major factors in getting things back to normal.
> Yesterday evening 100 PG&E first responders left from the Central Coast
> area for the East Coast. I understand most will be in the NJ & NYC-Long
> Island area.
>
> Stay safe.
>

Thanks,
Spending a few days with our daughter, in Stamford, CT.

--
Peter
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photoshop's "Merge to HDR" Function Annika1980 Digital Photography 11 12-18-2005 10:49 AM
Problems with PS CS2 Merge to HDR function? babalooixnay@hotmail.com Digital Photography 3 12-15-2005 02:43 AM
HDR/composite pictures with JPEG? none Digital Photography 8 11-22-2005 11:31 AM
HDR in Jet conn string =?Utf-8?B?U29sZWwgU29mdHdhcmU=?= ASP .Net 1 07-24-2004 06:20 AM
Creo's MOS and HDR file formats none Digital Photography 1 01-17-2004 03:05 AM



Advertisments