Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > HTML > Re: HTML5 code for Chrome

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: HTML5 code for Chrome

 
 
dorayme
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-19-2012
In article <75adnROphNwE->,
Robert Baer <> wrote:

> My site works reasonably well (sort-of anyway) for most browsers now,
> but Chrome make a royal mess during rendering.
> Is there a place that gives clues and hopefully examples of
> Chrome-acceptable HTML5 code?


The first question, before looking at special Chrome deficiencies, is
to make sure your website has none.

What do you mean sort-of OK in other browsers, that is intriguing? Can
you make a test case if you do not wish to give a url to the real
thing, something that shows all browsers rendering something in your
page one way (sort of) and Chrome rendering it quite another or not at
all?

--
dorayme
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Norman Peelman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2012
On 08/20/2012 03:55 PM, Robert Baer wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
>> In article<75adnROphNwE->,
>> Robert Baer<> wrote:
>>
>>> My site works reasonably well (sort-of anyway) for most browsers now,
>>> but Chrome make a royal mess during rendering.
>>> Is there a place that gives clues and hopefully examples of
>>> Chrome-acceptable HTML5 code?

>>
>> The first question, before looking at special Chrome deficiencies, is
>> to make sure your website has none.
>>
>> What do you mean sort-of OK in other browsers, that is intriguing? Can
>> you make a test case if you do not wish to give a url to the real
>> thing, something that shows all browsers rendering something in your
>> page one way (sort of) and Chrome rendering it quite another or not at
>> all?
>>

> OK; look at my site,home page only: http://www.oil4lessllc.com/
> Use IE6, IE7, IE8, IE9, FireFox, Opera, and Chrome.
> Chrome cannot get the menu right, and dumps the text that is
> associated with the sliding images, and it...enough of its deficiencies;
> it is the only one that craps up; even IE5 does better.
>
> My ideal is to have all of them show the same in a 800x600
> environment without a bottom bar (ie rendering is wider than 800px).
>
> I have a detailed query, with some code and a screen shot; where can
> i post that?
> Thanks.
>


Took a look at your site in

Chrome Version 22.0.1221.1 dev,
Firefox 14.0.1,
Thunderbrowse 3.81 (Gecko)

Anything that has to do with the 'sliding; images is borked in all
three browsers when viewed at your target resolution. At 1280x1024 it
looks better but still doesn't look right... there is a thin gap
underneath the text where the three small circle links are. Below all
that is fine.

--
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062
AMD64X2 6400+ Ubuntu 10.04 64bit
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
dorayme
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-21-2012
In article <> ,
Robert Baer <> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
> > In article<75adnROphNwE->,
> > Robert Baer<> wrote:
> >
> >> My site works reasonably well (sort-of anyway) for most browsers now,
> >> but Chrome make a royal mess during rendering.
> >> Is there a place that gives clues and hopefully examples of
> >> Chrome-acceptable HTML5 code?

> >
> > The first question, before looking at special Chrome deficiencies, is
> > to make sure your website has none.
> >
> > What do you mean sort-of OK in other browsers, that is intriguing? Can
> > you make a test case if you do not wish to give a url to the real
> > thing, something that shows all browsers rendering something in your
> > page one way (sort of) and Chrome rendering it quite another or not at
> > all?
> >

> OK; look at my site,home page only: http://www.oil4lessllc.com/
> Use IE6, IE7, IE8, IE9, FireFox, Opera, and Chrome.
> Chrome cannot get the menu right, and dumps the text that is
> associated with the sliding images, and it...enough of its deficiencies;
> it is the only one that craps up; even IE5 does better.
>


Just a few comments, probably not quite what you want...

I am looking at your home page in my Mac browsers first. In Opera,
nothing slides, even the "Popular Links" bottom left is entirely
missing. The arrows in the latter slide in Chrome, as in other Mac
browsers. In Opera, the page is not easily usable, never finishes
loading and does not show your slideshow at all and causing somehow
the shadow underline of the show to appear way below in the middle of
text.

On Windows the situation is similar, Chrome does not seem that
different to the others. But Win Opera seems to work as well as the
others

I mention all this because I think the design is way too complicated
and too high-wire to be a stable and good page, consider carefully
before expending time fixing this or that particular thing. Also look
at what happens when a user uses text size you are not expecting.

(I still have not finished

<http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/differentEyesights/textSpill.html>

but, there may be some tips for you in this old fashioned spiel of
mine <g>)

btw, if you go to

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/

you can check your CSS under CSS3 (which is less supported by browsers
but at least it's bottom line for the author css to conform)

You have a stray word, "dot" in your HTML, below your footer.

> My ideal is to have all of them show the same in a 800x600
> environment without a bottom bar (ie rendering is wider than 800px).
>


Very few people will happen to view your page at this size. Best to
design for nearly everyone. Your central "slide show" takes up a lot
of space. And there are lots and lots of problems with different less
than aesthetic things happening in different browsers.

> I have a detailed query, with some code and a screen shot; where can
> i post that?


You can put the screenshot up on a page on a public server, even
include a PRE of the code, Or you can include the code (markup and
css) in the usenet post. If it is a css query best to go to ciwas. If
it is an authoring issue not really related to css, ciwa, if unsure,
good old alt.html should be OK.

--
dorayme
 
Reply With Quote
 
dorayme
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-25-2012
In article <> ,
Robert Baer <> wrote:

....
> >>> dorayme wrote:

....
> >>
> >> On Windows the situation is similar, Chrome does not seem that
> >> different to the others. ...

> >

> Chrome was rendering junk; heard there was some kind of debug mode
> and tried that.
> Stepped thru the HTML code one-by-one and all of a sudden the menu
> which rendered like a list, *changed* to a single line like it should be.
> All of the rest also changed to what it should be.
> *
> So, here i had a browser that consistently crapped the code and got
> fixed by using the debug mode (once)!


Whatever it was, it was peculiar to something in your browser. if you
cannot repeat it, don't worry about it.

--
dorayme
 
Reply With Quote
 
dorayme
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-26-2012
In article <u->,
Robert Baer <> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:

....
> > I am looking at your home page in my Mac browsers first. In Opera,
> > nothing slides, even the "Popular Links" bottom left is entirely
> > missing. The arrows in the latter slide in Chrome, as in other Mac
> > browsers. In Opera, the page is not easily usable, never finishes
> > loading and does not show your slideshow at all and causing somehow
> > the shadow underline of the show to appear way below in the middle of
> > text.
> >
> > On Windows the situation is similar, Chrome does not seem that
> > different to the others. But Win Opera seems to work as well as the
> > others
> >
> > I mention all this because I think the design is way too complicated
> > and too high-wire to be a stable and good page, consider carefully
> > before expending time fixing this or that particular thing. Also look
> > at what happens when a user uses text size you are not expecting.
> >

....
> Is there a way to detect,early in the HTML that Opera is the browser,
> _then_ "switch" to a different HTML page?


<http://www.sitepoint.com/why-browser-sniffing-stinks/>

--
dorayme
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jonathan N. Little
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-28-2012
Robert Baer wrote:
> Have found two different ways to uniquely detect Opera..so that is
> solved.
> Now, how do i "switch" to a different HTML page?


With JavaScript as it has been posted numerous times.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
 
Reply With Quote
 
Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-28-2012
Jonathan N. Little wrote:

> Robert Baer wrote:
>> Have found two different ways to uniquely detect Opera..so that is
>> solved.
>> Now, how do i "switch" to a different HTML page?

>
> With JavaScript as it has been posted numerous times.


...and still likely not necessary. Seems to me it would be more prudent to
just fix whatever it is that doesn't work in his Opera browser. (I wonder
if it would work in *my* Opera browser?)

A lot of effort for a 0.2 to 0.8% of browsers... (the amount of Opera
browsers connecting to my web sites).

--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jonathan N. Little
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-28-2012
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>
>> Robert Baer wrote:
>>> Have found two different ways to uniquely detect Opera..so that is
>>> solved.
>>> Now, how do i "switch" to a different HTML page?

>>
>> With JavaScript as it has been posted numerous times.

>
> ..and still likely not necessary. Seems to me it would be more prudent to
> just fix whatever it is that doesn't work in his Opera browser. (I wonder
> if it would work in *my* Opera browser?)
>
> A lot of effort for a 0.2 to 0.8% of browsers... (the amount of Opera
> browsers connecting to my web sites).
>


Unfortunately what is prudent, facts, and whatever is not important to
the OP, he has set his mind to "what must be done". To suggest otherwise
is moot.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: HTML5 code for Chrome richard HTML 0 08-22-2012 07:40 PM
RDoc and HTML5: 'tt' -> 'code' Intransition Ruby 0 05-27-2010 04:34 PM
Google Chrome OS, Odds are stacked against Chrome OS's success Max Burke NZ Computing 1 07-11-2009 04:38 AM
HTML5 vs. XHTML n0ctis HTML 4 08-18-2008 03:11 PM
html5 vs xhtml2 Robert Jones HTML 16 12-14-2007 11:34 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57