In article <> ,
Robert Baer <> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
> > In article<75adnROphNwE->,
> > Robert Baer<> wrote:
> >
> >> My site works reasonably well (sort-of anyway) for most browsers now,
> >> but Chrome make a royal mess during rendering.
> >> Is there a place that gives clues and hopefully examples of
> >> Chrome-acceptable HTML5 code?
> >
> > The first question, before looking at special Chrome deficiencies, is
> > to make sure your website has none.
> >
> > What do you mean sort-of OK in other browsers, that is intriguing? Can
> > you make a test case if you do not wish to give a url to the real
> > thing, something that shows all browsers rendering something in your
> > page one way (sort of) and Chrome rendering it quite another or not at
> > all?
> >
> OK; look at my site,home page only: http://www.oil4lessllc.com/
> Use IE6, IE7, IE8, IE9, FireFox, Opera, and Chrome.
> Chrome cannot get the menu right, and dumps the text that is
> associated with the sliding images, and it...enough of its deficiencies;
> it is the only one that craps up; even IE5 does better.
>
Just a few comments, probably not quite what you want...
I am looking at your home page in my Mac browsers first. In Opera,
nothing slides, even the "Popular Links" bottom left is entirely
missing. The arrows in the latter slide in Chrome, as in other Mac
browsers. In Opera, the page is not easily usable, never finishes
loading and does not show your slideshow at all and causing somehow
the shadow underline of the show to appear way below in the middle of
text.
On Windows the situation is similar, Chrome does not seem that
different to the others. But Win Opera seems to work as well as the
others
I mention all this because I think the design is way too complicated
and too high-wire to be a stable and good page, consider carefully
before expending time fixing this or that particular thing. Also look
at what happens when a user uses text size you are not expecting.
(I still have not finished
<http://dorayme.netweaver.com.au/differentEyesights/textSpill.html>
but, there may be some tips for you in this old fashioned spiel of
mine <g>)
btw, if you go to
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
you can check your CSS under CSS3 (which is less supported by browsers
but at least it's bottom line for the author css to conform)
You have a stray word, "dot" in your HTML, below your footer.
> My ideal is to have all of them show the same in a 800x600
> environment without a bottom bar (ie rendering is wider than 800px).
>
Very few people will happen to view your page at this size. Best to
design for nearly everyone. Your central "slide show" takes up a lot
of space. And there are lots and lots of problems with different less
than aesthetic things happening in different browsers.
> I have a detailed query, with some code and a screen shot; where can
> i post that?
You can put the screenshot up on a page on a public server, even
include a PRE of the code, Or you can include the code (markup and
css) in the usenet post. If it is a css query best to go to ciwas. If
it is an authoring issue not really related to css, ciwa, if unsure,
good old alt.html should be OK.
--
dorayme