Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > Question on QoS on a 6509e

Reply
Thread Tools

Question on QoS on a 6509e

 
 
Steve Pfister
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-27-2012
We've recently installed a 6509e to replace a 4507R as a core switch. I'm having a bit of trouble getting the QoS settings right. I've got most of it right, I think, but the old config has:

map dscp 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 to tx-queue 2

and also:

tx-queue 3

priority high

on several interfaces. This config was in place before I got here. Can someone give me a hint on how to get this working on the new config?

Thanks!

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Stephen
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-28-2012
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:58:52 -0700 (PDT), Steve Pfister
<> wrote:

>We've recently installed a 6509e to replace a 4507R as a core switch. I'm having a bit of trouble getting the QoS settings right. I've got most of it right, I think, but the old config has:
>

a google for "cisco.com 6500 best practice" will get you several links
to cisco docs - these are open access

1 issue with the 6509 is there have been several flavours of QoS
implementation for different blades over the years, so QoS tends to be
hardware specific
- for example your I/O blades could have between 2 and 8 output
queues, and some behave differently if that blade has a DFC
daughtercard.....

>map dscp 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 to tx-queue 2


read the QoS manual docs, or the best practice guide.

1 way to get reasonable results is to use the autoqos commands - pick
a port flavour for trunks, end user connections etc, use autoqos and
you get sensible settings for some scenarios.

from memory
basically the inbound packet DSCP or another marking logically maps a
packet to a queue, and that mapping flows through to the output with
the packet

the map command overrides the default mapping.
>
>and also:
>
>tx-queue 3
>
> priority high
>

Some blades have a fixed priority queue - others can choose 1 queue as
priority or a different scheme.

>on several interfaces. This config was in place before I got here. Can someone give me a hint on how to get this working on the new config?
>
>Thanks!

--
Regards

- replace xyz with ntl
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Steve Pfister
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-30-2012
> 1 way to get reasonable results is to use the autoqos commands

I'm starting to look at autoqos at your suggestion. Does the 6509 not support 'auto discovery qos'? Is there something else I need to turn on to get that?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Stephen
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-31-2012
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:17:21 -0700 (PDT), Steve Pfister
<> wrote:

>> 1 way to get reasonable results is to use the autoqos commands

>
>I'm starting to look at autoqos at your suggestion. Does the 6509 not support 'auto discovery qos'? Is there something else I need to turn on to get that?


a lot depends on software versions supervisor card types etc.

all the manuals are online, so grab the outputs from "sh inventory",
"sh hardware", "sh version" and go grab the docs.

The cisco docs are good and there is plenty of info online, but once
you get thru the support docs / software verison intro you should be
able to find the stuff you need fairly easily since it is cross
linked.
www.cisco.com/go/6500

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/...iterature.html

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/...ries_home.html


--
Regards

- replace xyz with ntl
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[QOS] minimal hardware and IOS requirement for QOS dominix Cisco 2 02-06-2007 10:19 AM
QOS for VOIP using 768k of FR / Auto QOS Andrew Albert Cisco 7 02-09-2005 07:42 PM
Re: QoS Policy Question & Recommendations Ben Cisco 1 11-18-2004 04:46 AM
Question About Configuring QoS c Cisco 1 07-07-2004 05:48 PM
Nachi is for the devil! Flow QoS question Smash Cisco 2 11-26-2003 02:45 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57