Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Java > How to not use casting to invoke the methods of a List of objects

Reply
Thread Tools

How to not use casting to invoke the methods of a List of objects

 
 
clusardi2k@aol.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-20-2012
Below uses a List of objects of class Route. Class Route has public member variables (such as locationid) and public methods (such as get_locationid()). The below code is a first attempt at a way to obtain the value of locationid using casting. Question: What is the code to do it a better way.

((Route)objList.get(0)).locationid;
((Route)objList.get(1)).locationid;

The below start of replacement code fails because it skips through the list.. There wasn't a good reason for me to finish the code! The loop can't eveniterate the required number of loops.

Iterator <Route> it = objList.iterator();

int size = objList.size();

for (int i = 0;i < size; i++)
{
it.next();
}

Thank you,
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
markspace
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-20-2012
On 7/20/2012 6:58 AM, wrote:

> The
> loop can't even iterate the required number of loops.



You might want to be more clear about what is really failing here.
Iterator works, so the problem must be somewhere else in the code, which
you are not showing.


>
> Iterator <Route> it = objList.iterator();
>
> int size = objList.size();
>
> for (int i = 0;i < size; i++)
> {


Maybe you could try this:

> Route r = it.next();
> }



But in general the for-each construct works better

for( Route r : objList ) {
r. ...
}

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
clusardi2k@aol.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-20-2012
> On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:21:56 AM UTC-4, markspace wrote:
> > On 7/20/2012 6:58 AM, me wrote:
> > for (int i = 0;i &lt; size; i++)
> > {

>
> Maybe you could try this:
>
> > Route r = it.next();
> > }

>


This works when I don't use the debugger to step through, thanks!


 
Reply With Quote
 
Joerg Meier
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-20-2012
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:58:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

> The below start of replacement code fails because it skips through the list. There wasn't a good reason for me to finish the code! The loop can't even iterate the required number of loops.


> Iterator <Route> it = objList.iterator();


> int size = objList.size();


> for (int i = 0;i < size; i++)
> {
> it.next();
> }


That is not really how you use iterators. Proper way:

Iterator <Route> it = objList.iterator();

while (it.hasNext()) {
it.next();
}

Liebe Gruesse,
Joerg

--
Ich lese meine Emails nicht, replies to Email bleiben also leider
ungelesen.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Klemme
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-20-2012
On 20.07.2012 17:45, Joerg Meier wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:58:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
>
>> The below start of replacement code fails because it skips through the list. There wasn't a good reason for me to finish the code! The loop can't even iterate the required number of loops.

>
>> Iterator <Route> it = objList.iterator();

>
>> int size = objList.size();

>
>> for (int i = 0;i < size; i++)
>> {
>> it.next();
>> }

>
> That is not really how you use iterators. Proper way:
>
> Iterator <Route> it = objList.iterator();
>
> while (it.hasNext()) {
> it.next();
> }


In 2012 I'd rather say the proper way for a simple iteration (i.e.
without removing elements or such) is

for (final Route r : objList) {
// camel case and accessor added:
System.out.println(r.getLocationId());
}

Assuming objList is assignment compatible to Iterable<Route>. We
haven't seen the declaration in the original posting though so we can
only speculate.

I do have to agree that the original question was quite a bit dark.

Cheers

robert

--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
 
Reply With Quote
 
Joerg Meier
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-20-2012
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:03:08 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:

> In 2012 I'd rather say the proper way for a simple iteration (i.e.
> without removing elements or such) is


> for (final Route r : objList) { [...]


I agree that the enhanced for loop is preferrable for cases without
structural changes to the list. Blame tunnel vision

Liebe Gruesse,
Joerg

--
Ich lese meine Emails nicht, replies to Email bleiben also leider
ungelesen.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Roedy Green
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-21-2012
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:58:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote,
quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

>Below uses a List of objects of class Route. Class Route has public member =
>variables (such as locationid) and public methods (such as get_locationid()=
>). The below code is a first attempt at a way to obtain the value of locati=
>onid using casting. Question: What is the code to do it a better way.


see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/generics.html

Generics let you tell the compiler what types you are hiding in your
collections so it can do the casting for you.
--
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.
~ Dr. Albert A. Bartlett (born: 1923-03-21 age: 89)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY


 
Reply With Quote
 
Lew
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-22-2012
On 07/20/2012 06:58 AM, wrote:
> Below uses a List of objects of class Route. Class Route has public member


Public variables are frowned upon in Java. That doesn't mean never use them,
but it does make me wonder why you also defined an accessor method.

> variables (such as locationid) and public methods (such as get_locationid()).


You should follow the Java naming conventions: locationId and getLocationId().
Camel case. No underscores.

Don't describe your code. That's all but useless. Show your code.

http://sscce.org/

> The below code is a first attempt at a way to obtain the value of locationid
> using casting. Question: What is the code to do it a better way.


In addition to what everyone else has said
> ((Route)objList.get(0)).locationid;


'objList' is a bad name. You have a collection of 'Route's, right? So your
variable should be 'routes'.

> ((Route)objList.get(1)).locationid;
>


Why are you casting at all?

Route route = routes.get(0);

You did declare your list as a 'List<Route>', of course, right?

> The below start of replacement code fails because it skips through the list. There wasn't a good reason for me to finish the code! The loop can't even iterate the required number of loops.
>
> Iterator <Route> it = objList.iterator();


Indent enough?

> int size = objList.size();
>
> for (int i = 0;i < size; i++)
> {
> it.next();
> }


You shouldn't use both indexes and iterators in the same loop. Stick with one
or another for any given loop.

You should never use an iterator 'next()' without checking 'hasNext()' first.

You often can, and therefore in those cases should, use the for-each loop, as
others have already said:

for (Route route : routes)
{
doSomethingWith(route);
}

--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi.../c/cf/Friz.jpg
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: How include a large array? Edward A. Falk C Programming 1 04-04-2013 08:07 PM
Up casting and down casting Sosuke C++ 2 12-20-2009 03:24 PM
Problem with depracated casting method (down casting) Wally Barnes C++ 3 11-20-2008 05:33 AM
Is there a way to find the class methods of a class, just like'methods' finds the instance methods? Kenneth McDonald Ruby 5 09-26-2008 03:09 PM
Another question about inheritance (up-casting and down-casting) kevin Java 11 01-08-2005 07:11 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57