On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:18:56 -0400, PeterN <>
wrote:
: On 4/29/2012 7:31 AM, Robert Coe wrote:
: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 22:41:10 -0400, tony cooper<>
: > wrote:
: > : On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:42:11 -0400, PeterN
: > :<> wrote:
: > :
: > :>On 4/28/2012 6:41 PM, RichA wrote:
: > :>> On Apr 28, 12:42 pm, Alan Browne<alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
: > :>> wrote:
: > :>>> Last month the Committee asked for suggestions for a new mandate.
: > :>>
: > :>>> Decay (consider shots of abandoned, or forgotten architecture,
: > :>>> engineering, infrastructure, etc.)
: > :>>
: > :>> No fair! The Americans in the northeast have too much of an advantage
: > :>> here.

: > :>
: > :>Posted with your usual actual knowledge.
: > :>
: > :>Let's see what you contribute
: > :
: > : Actually, I agree with him. Nine out of ten abandoned architecture
: > : subjects down here are foreclosed houses and decaying strip malls.
: >
: > Well, those *are* timely subjects for a decaying architecture mandate. :^|
: >
: > The challenge in Florida might be to find the most opulent foreclosed
: > house in the state. Extra points if it belonged to a gangster, druglord,
: > political boss, or other famous celebrity.
: >
:
: Didn't you mean "infamous celebrity?"
:
:
In today's society, what's the difference? I submit that anyone who imagines
that there actually is a difference didn't watch last night's White House
Correspondents' Dinner! (That is to say, they didn't watch it on CNN. C-SPAN
at least broadcast it a cappella, without the continual intervention by
fawning commentators.)
Bob