On Jun 8, 11:27 am, Kenneth Tilton <kentil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> RobG wrote:
> > On Jun 8, 6:26 am, Kenneth Tilton <kentil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The qooxlisp apropos example can now actually be run here (ignore the
> >> site name):
>
> >> http://www.teamalgebra.com/
>
> > With javascript disabled, it shows a blank page.
>
> Possibly related to this being a javascript library? The next version
> has a noscript chunk to help you out.
Good, but even better would be to have a plain HTML page that at least
has some information about what the site is about, what it is supposed
to demonstrate and some examples of its use.
> > Enabling javascript, the page took nearly 4 minutes to load.
>
> I get that, too, sometimes. Not sure what's going on. Possibly the
> server is being silly, because other times it loads in 4-5s.
As Thomas said, if you think 3MB will take 5 seconds to load, you want
approximately 25Mb to download at about 5mb/s. That's not including
the 355 HTTP requests, intermediate browser processing, dropped
packets, headers, etc. You are depending on caching quite a bit. Your
(missing) introduction page could explain some of that so at least
users are aware of the possible lengthy delay before making a decision
about proceeding.
> What browser/OS?
The browsers are below, the OS is Windows XP.
> > Downloading 335 files totalling 3MB is going to take a very long time
> > on any system.
>
> No, I normally get 4-5s. Any time it hangs I reset the browser (not that
> that should be necessary) and then I get 4-5s.
What do you mean by "reset"? Restart? Close a tab and re-open? Clear
the cache?
> Anyway, I just did a "release build" and it's one file, 989kb. Not
> nothing, but should be even better.
That should help, but will still require quite a bit of time and users
should be warned so they can make their own decision about whether or
not to proceed.
> > Once viewed, the page is dysfunctional in both Firefox 3.6 and IE 6. I
> > can't get it to do anything, are there instructions?
>
> I am starting to think it's my bug. The next release will have a
> "Search" button I suspect will work so you can at least have some fun.
> I'll try adding some instructions to the page itself.
Or to an introduction page that can be left open in another tab or
window at the user's discretion.
[...]
> >> --http://www.stuckonalgebra.com
[...]
> >> "The best Algebra tutorial program I have seen... in a class by itself."
> >> Macworld
>
> > Quotes without meaningful attribution make me suspicious.
>
> You never heard of Macworld?
Yes, but the attribution is incomplete (and the reader is left
wondering why).
> > According to the "stuckonalgebra" site, there is no Mac version,
>
> The Mac does not have Web browsers? You have a scoop.
Whether or not there are browsers for Mac OS is irrelevant. I can't
find a link to a web version on that site, all links eventually lead
to a download page that states:
| Pick your operating system:
| 1. Windows XP
| 2. Windows Vista or Windows 7
| 3. Mac OS X (coming soon!)
The site does not offer a browser version and *states* that there is
no Mac version. Whether there are browsers for Mac OS is irrelevant at
this point.
> > which
> > left me wondering what was reviwed and when, given that Macworld is a
> > Mac-specific magazine. A search revealed that the quote is from a
> > superficial review[1] of "Algebra I Homework Tutor from Missing Link
> > Software" in April 1991.
>
> If "in a class by itself" is superficial, I'll take it.
The *review* is superficial and nearly 20 years old, before the WWW
was invented. Even if there is a web-based version available now, the
review is of an entirely different product from an eon ago and
therefore irrelevant.
It's like IBM claiming technical competence based on a 1930s review of
their electric accounting machine[1].
1. <URL:
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/ex...506VV9012.html
>
--
Rob