> > What is your level of programming experience? In the particular how
> > would you define "all anonymous functions"? All named references to a
> > function or the initial reference only? If you don't understand the
> > question I can try to rephrase it with a sample.
> My programming experience is longer than I care to remember, but not
> JS, not even slightly, which is probably not helping my cause much. I
> guess any function/method which is usable, I'd like to list that.
You may start with a simple for-in loop to get your feet wet in
Javascript.
Also
if (typeof someProperty == 'object')
will tell you if someProperty is an object by itself with its own
possible set of properties to go on recursion. Ask if you need more
help.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
<html lang="en-US">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-type"
content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>Demo</title>
<script type="text/javascript">
function init() {
var out = document.forms[0].elements['out'];
var arr = new Array;
var probe = window;
for (var p in probe) {
arr.push(''+p);
}
arr.sort();
for (var i=0; i<arr.length; i++) {
out.value+= arr[i] + '=' + probe[arr[i]] + '\n\n';
}
}
function releaseContextAndInit() {
window.setTimeout('init()',10);
}
window.onload = releaseContextAndInit;
</script>
</head>
<body>
<form action="" onsubmit="return false;">
<fieldset>
<legend>Demo</legend>
<textarea name="out" rows="16" cols="64"></textarea>
</fieldset>
</form>
</body>
</html>
> > You didn't understand me. My question was: do you want to study a
> > running code for method references - or you want to parse some text
> > say library.js to find all occurrences of "function" string in it and
> > regexp with it?
>
> I understand your question, it's just that I'm not bothered which way
> I end up doing this, I can use JavaScript in a running browser, and
> capture the output, or indeed run some kind of regex thing and get the
> results that way, I'm relatively indifferent about how I get this
> done, just so long as it works. My first thought was to use something
> like ctags, or maybe a Python parser, but I could not find anything
> which was much good. My thoughts then turned to using the DOM tree or
> something like that, which I'd expect to be a bit more robust, after
> all, what understand JS better than a browser?
>
> Thanks
>
> Garry
Similar Threads
