On Mar 29, 1:12 am, Dr J R Stockton <j...@merlyn.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >comp.lang.javascript is a Usenet group, not a web-forum or blog.
> >Respectively the question "Which newsgroups deal with javascript?"
> >refers to official Usenet groups passed the standard voting process
> >and having a charter clearly refering to appropriate thematics.
>
<snip>
> There's no reason why
> non-Usenet resources should not be used to discover the existence of
> Usenet groups not carried by one's own news server. Indeed, Google's
> archives are often referred to in news:clj.
Let's us do not mix the Holly Grail and a hot grill. Usenet archives
maintained by DejaNews and now by Google is one thing, Usenet groups
themselves is all another one. For popular and useful Web resources
there is FAQ 3.2
What online resources are available?
http://www.jibbering.com/faq/index.html#FAQ3_2
But the usability and reliability of non-official resource is too much
of personal bias: someone is crazy of site X, some other gets nuts
over it. So I would keep 3.2 as close to it current state as possible:
with the primary focus on official specifications and producers'
documentation. Anyone is still free to suggest extra resources to add
including free personal forums provided by Google, Yahoo, MSN and al
FAQ 2.1 is what it is: official Usenet newsgroups having charter
corresponding to the thematics in question - though maybe from
different aspects and on different languages. This point is not
discutable.
> >1) Official national newsgroups (Germany, France, Italy etc.)
> >2) Vendor-specific ECMAScript implementations (Microsoft, Gecko, Adobe-
> >PDF, Adobe-ActionScript etc.)
>
> >If one could make a verified list of such groups with one-line
> >description for each then that would be something to support IMO.
>
> I believe that it would be easy enough for someone with direct
> administrative access to a classical UNIX news server to extract such a
> list, for groups whose names or descriptions included javascript or
> ecmascript or jscript; but it would only include those carried by that
> server. Google's indiscriminancy provides fuller information, but with
> a need to prune out undesirables such as comp.lang.java.javascript.
All ever officially created Usenet group was once announced at
news.announce.newgroups
with all voting results and charter. This is the standard Usenet
procedure. Google mirror is at
http://groups.google.com/group/news....wgroups/topics
So it is easy to check different search results against the records.
Again, your post is full of wishful thinking but none of practical
actions. Are you going to do it or just stay on "searching the best
approaches to approach the problem"? We are not on monthly fixed
salary here to make the latter anynow interesting
This way I'm not commenting on the rest of your thoughts. If they are
firm and well established then please realize them into FAQ 2.1 in the
exact form you want to see it so the community could discuss it.