> Are you looking in Firefox's Error Console?
Yes, and it shows no javascript errors AT ALL
... it does, however, show some CSS errors, and I am trying to fix
those. It'd would be great if tweaking the CSS fixed the display problem
... I could see that happening. I'm trying to make my CSS comply with
standards, but I haven't figured out yet what's wrong with my CSS as it
stands.
I'm trying to install Firebug now. Thanks for that tip.
> You might start with:
> Error: parent is not defined
> Source File: parent.SJCGAgallery.ShowPic(32,1,17,0)
But "parent" IS defined: that's where the javascripts reside, in a
sibling frame, accessed through the standard "parent" object in the
frame heirarchy ... and I *know* the frames exist, I *know* parent is
defined, because the scripts there are executing! If
parent.SJCGAgallery.ShowPic() didn't exist, how could the browser run
the script? The scripts ARE running, just fine! FUNCTIONALITY of the
scripts is at 100% ... FireFox's DISPLAY of the generated content is the
problem.
(Good lord, maybe javascript isn't the problem. Maybe I'm totally in the
wrong newsgroup.)
Where did you get that error anyway? I don't see it in the FireFox error
console.
> Use HTML. It nonsensical to use script to create entire pages that
> can be done vastly more efficiently with plain (valid, non-deprecated)
> HTML. And don't use frames.
I have to disagree there. I currently have three hundred photos to
manage, each with its own display page, and all grouped into several
thumbnailed gallery pages, many cross-referenced. There's no way in heck
I would consider building a plain HTML page for each photo. Every time
somebody gave me a new photo, I'd have to make a new page, and edit
every thumbnail gallery it belongs to. It'd be a nightmare. A database,
and on-the-fly page generation from the database, is the only way. (And
what's wrong with frames?)
*** Sent via Developersdex
http://www.developersdex.com ***