«

Can anyone recommend a good host for a small site (<10 mb - low traffic)
and a pop account? There are so many options out there it's hard to
choose. In the past I've used llamacom.com which is very affordable
($7.95/Month) and reliable, but they do not have any asp.net support. If
they did they would be ideal. Alas.
TIA!

Matt

Shawn asked this in the newsgroup about 3 hours ago...
Answers have been:

1 -
My not-yet-wife has been with www.myhosting.com for about five years and has
done nothing but praise them.

Ray at home


2 -
My not-yet-wife has been with www.myhosting.com for about five years and has
done nothing but praise them.

Ray at home


3 -
My not-yet-wife has been with www.myhosting.com for about five years and has
done nothing but praise them.

Ray at home


4 -
Hi,

I use webhost4life.com, currently I have 8 active sites with them. They
charge $9.95 a month but it includes 150MB of SQL Server 2000 database space
which puts them over the top in terms of value. Ken.


Karl



--
MY ASP.Net tutorials
http://www.openmymind.net/


"MattB" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Can anyone recommend a good host for a small site (<10 mb - low traffic)
> and a pop account? There are so many options out there it's hard to
> choose. In the past I've used llamacom.com which is very affordable
> ($7.95/Month) and reliable, but they do not have any asp.net support. If
> they did they would be ideal. Alas.
> TIA!
>
> Matt

www.discountasp.net

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://Steve.Orr.net


"MattB" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Can anyone recommend a good host for a small site (<10 mb - low traffic)
> and a pop account? There are so many options out there it's hard to
> choose. In the past I've used llamacom.com which is very affordable
> ($7.95/Month) and reliable, but they do not have any asp.net support. If
> they did they would be ideal. Alas.
> TIA!
>
> Matt

Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD] < > wrote:
> www.discountasp.net

I second this reccomendation. We went with them for a small site (class
project) and the setup was a breeze and they seem to answer questions at all
times of the day.

Urchin is a really cool statistics tool to track hits, page views, etc. You
might also see who offers this program or one like it.


"MattB" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Can anyone recommend a good host for a small site (<10 mb - low traffic)
> and a pop account? There are so many options out there it's hard to
> choose. In the past I've used llamacom.com which is very affordable
> ($7.95/Month) and reliable, but they do not have any asp.net support. If
> they did they would be ideal. Alas.
> TIA!
>
> Matt

www.hostset.com


>-----Original Message-----
>Can anyone recommend a good host for a small site (<10
mb - low traffic)
>and a pop account? There are so many options out there
it's hard to
>choose. In the past I've used llamacom.com which is very
affordable
>($7.95/Month) and reliable, but they do not have any
asp.net support. If
>they did they would be ideal. Alas.
>TIA!
>
>Matt
>.
>

I'll make it thirds. I've been with them for almost a year now. If I
were to fill out one of those annual review forms from the HR
department, I'd check off the "exceeded expectations" box.

--
Scott
http://www.OdeToCode.com/blogs/scott/

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:06:26 -0600, "Jeff Evans"
<jwevans1@you_eye_you_see.edu> wrote:

>Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD] < > wrote:
>> www.discountasp.net
>
>I second this reccomendation. We went with them for a small site (class
>project) and the setup was a breeze and they seem to answer questions at all
>times of the day.
>

I'd recommend Data-Trak.Net - feel free to email them. Very friendly and
helpful staff. Very customizable plans too - just talk to them (or email).
www.data-trak.net

"MattB" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Can anyone recommend a good host for a small site (<10 mb - low traffic)
> and a pop account? There are so many options out there it's hard to
> choose. In the past I've used llamacom.com which is very affordable
> ($7.95/Month) and reliable, but they do not have any asp.net support. If
> they did they would be ideal. Alas.
> TIA!
>
> Matt